Ah, how the times change. When I <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/headphones/805">reviewed</A&gt; Etymotic Research's ER-4S in-ear headphones in the July 1995 <I>Stereophile</I>, they seemed expensive to me at $330, but well worth that seemingly high price: at the time, they were the best headphones I'd heard. Nowadays, with reference headphones costing well north of a kilobuck, the price of the ER-4S seems relatively reasonable.

Ah, how the times change. When I <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/headphones/805">reviewed</A&gt; Etymotic Research's ER-4S in-ear headphones in the July 1995 <I>Stereophile</I>, they seemed expensive to me at $330, but well worth that seemingly high price: at the time, they were the best headphones I'd heard. Nowadays, with reference headphones costing well north of a kilobuck, the price of the ER-4S seems relatively reasonable.

Ah, how the times change. When I <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/headphones/805">reviewed</A&gt; Etymotic Research's ER-4S in-ear headphones in the July 1995 <I>Stereophile</I>, they seemed expensive to me at $330, but well worth that seemingly high price: at the time, they were the best headphones I'd heard. Nowadays, with reference headphones costing well north of a kilobuck, the price of the ER-4S seems relatively reasonable.

Ah, how the times change. When I <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/headphones/805">reviewed</A&gt; Etymotic Research's ER-4S in-ear headphones in the July 1995 <I>Stereophile</I>, they seemed expensive to me at $330, but well worth that seemingly high price: at the time, they were the best headphones I'd heard. Nowadays, with reference headphones costing well north of a kilobuck, the price of the ER-4S seems relatively reasonable.

Ah, how the times change. When I <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/headphones/805">reviewed</A&gt; Etymotic Research's ER-4S in-ear headphones in the July 1995 <I>Stereophile</I>, they seemed expensive to me at $330, but well worth that seemingly high price: at the time, they were the best headphones I'd heard. Nowadays, with reference headphones costing well north of a kilobuck, the price of the ER-4S seems relatively reasonable.

Ah, how the times change. When I reviewed Etymotic Research's ER-4S in-ear headphones in the July 1995 Stereophile, they seemed expensive to me at $330, but well worth that seemingly high price: at the time, they were the best headphones I'd heard. Nowadays, with reference headphones costing well north of a kilobuck, the price of the ER-4S seems relatively reasonable.

Over the years, <I>Stereophile</I> and its writers have been taken to task for doing, thinking, and saying any number of things. We've been raked over the coals for enjoying acoustic music, electric music, old music, new music, light music, serious music, and music God put here as a test, just to see if we're smart enough to hate it. We've been taken to the woodshed for comparing new products to known references; for failing to compare new products with known references; for borrowing known references for the purpose of such comparisons; for taking advantage of professional discounts so that we can buy and keep known references for the purpose of such comparisons; for being out-of-touch na&Ocirc;fs who haven't owned enough gear in our lives to know anything about anything; and for being spoiled, materialistic pigs who have owned so many things that we've lost touch with The Common Man. We've been assaulted for loving analog, dissed for loving digital, tasered for loving tubes, sucker-slapped for loving solid-state, and mauled for loving mono. We've even been impeached, indicted, secretly reassigned to a new diocese, and flown back to Russia without an adult guardian for being overly concerned with current events.