In his recent review of the <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/663/">Thiel CS1.6 loudspeaker</A>, John Atkinson pointed out that while expensive speakers "do indeed provide great sound for the tens of thousands of dollars they demand from their owners, they are out of reach of the majority of audiophiles." Ever the populist, JA tackles this reasonably priced Thiel to see how it measures up to the big boys.

Chip manufacturer <A HREF="http://www.cirrus.com">Cirrus Logic</A> announced last week that it has introduced two audio, high-performance, digital-to-analog converters (DACs) that it claims will enable manufacturers to bring more DVD-Audio players to the mainstream consumer market.

On Wednesday, September 11, the <A HREF="http://www.nab.org">National Association of Broadcasters</A> (NAB) filed a brief with the U.S. Copyright Office seeking relief from the implementation of a webcasting royalty schedule announced this summer by the Librarian of Congress, James Billington. In June, Billington determined that commercial stations streaming their musical programming on the Internet should pay a rate of .07 cents per song per 1000 listeners, a rate less than half that suggested by the music industry&ndash;backed Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel.

As the saying goes, there are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics. Statistics can be used to help understand what goes on in the world, but, as any marketing exec or PR company knows, they can also be manipulated to tell a particular story.

What if they gave a format war and nobody came?

In the past year, <I>Stereophile</I> has reviewed a number of cost-no-object flagship loudspeakers. <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/600/">B&W's Signature 800</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/390/">MartinLogan's Prodigy</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/601/">Burmester's B-99</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/556/">Snell's XA Reference Tower</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/382/">Krell's LAT-1</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/555/">Linn's Komri</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/501/">Dynaudio's Evidence Temptation</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/391/">Sony's ES SS-M9ED</A>, and <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/644/">Rockport's Antares</A> have all passed through the review mill. Manufacturers like to submit their flagships for review for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the pride they take in showing what their engineers can do when given a blank check. However, while all these models do indeed provide great (if different) sound for the tens of thousands of dollars they demand from their owners, they are out of reach of the majority of audiophiles. It is important, therefore, for reviewers to spend time with real-world designs; when I heard the $1990/pair CS1.6 from Kentucky's Thiel at the 2002 CES last January, I requested a pair for review.

In the past year, <I>Stereophile</I> has reviewed a number of cost-no-object flagship loudspeakers. <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/600/">B&W's Signature 800</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/390/">MartinLogan's Prodigy</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/601/">Burmester's B-99</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/556/">Snell's XA Reference Tower</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/382/">Krell's LAT-1</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/555/">Linn's Komri</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/501/">Dynaudio's Evidence Temptation</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/391/">Sony's ES SS-M9ED</A>, and <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/644/">Rockport's Antares</A> have all passed through the review mill. Manufacturers like to submit their flagships for review for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the pride they take in showing what their engineers can do when given a blank check. However, while all these models do indeed provide great (if different) sound for the tens of thousands of dollars they demand from their owners, they are out of reach of the majority of audiophiles. It is important, therefore, for reviewers to spend time with real-world designs; when I heard the $1990/pair CS1.6 from Kentucky's Thiel at the 2002 CES last January, I requested a pair for review.

In the past year, <I>Stereophile</I> has reviewed a number of cost-no-object flagship loudspeakers. <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/600/">B&W's Signature 800</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/390/">MartinLogan's Prodigy</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/601/">Burmester's B-99</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/556/">Snell's XA Reference Tower</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/382/">Krell's LAT-1</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/555/">Linn's Komri</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/501/">Dynaudio's Evidence Temptation</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/391/">Sony's ES SS-M9ED</A>, and <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/644/">Rockport's Antares</A> have all passed through the review mill. Manufacturers like to submit their flagships for review for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the pride they take in showing what their engineers can do when given a blank check. However, while all these models do indeed provide great (if different) sound for the tens of thousands of dollars they demand from their owners, they are out of reach of the majority of audiophiles. It is important, therefore, for reviewers to spend time with real-world designs; when I heard the $1990/pair CS1.6 from Kentucky's Thiel at the 2002 CES last January, I requested a pair for review.

In the past year, <I>Stereophile</I> has reviewed a number of cost-no-object flagship loudspeakers. <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/600/">B&W's Signature 800</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/390/">MartinLogan's Prodigy</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/601/">Burmester's B-99</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/556/">Snell's XA Reference Tower</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/382/">Krell's LAT-1</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/555/">Linn's Komri</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/501/">Dynaudio's Evidence Temptation</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/391/">Sony's ES SS-M9ED</A>, and <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/644/">Rockport's Antares</A> have all passed through the review mill. Manufacturers like to submit their flagships for review for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the pride they take in showing what their engineers can do when given a blank check. However, while all these models do indeed provide great (if different) sound for the tens of thousands of dollars they demand from their owners, they are out of reach of the majority of audiophiles. It is important, therefore, for reviewers to spend time with real-world designs; when I heard the $1990/pair CS1.6 from Kentucky's Thiel at the 2002 CES last January, I requested a pair for review.

In the past year, <I>Stereophile</I> has reviewed a number of cost-no-object flagship loudspeakers. <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/600/">B&W's Signature 800</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/390/">MartinLogan's Prodigy</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/601/">Burmester's B-99</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/556/">Snell's XA Reference Tower</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/382/">Krell's LAT-1</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/555/">Linn's Komri</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/501/">Dynaudio's Evidence Temptation</A>, <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/391/">Sony's ES SS-M9ED</A>, and <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//loudspeakerreviews/644/">Rockport's Antares</A> have all passed through the review mill. Manufacturers like to submit their flagships for review for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the pride they take in showing what their engineers can do when given a blank check. However, while all these models do indeed provide great (if different) sound for the tens of thousands of dollars they demand from their owners, they are out of reach of the majority of audiophiles. It is important, therefore, for reviewers to spend time with real-world designs; when I heard the $1990/pair CS1.6 from Kentucky's Thiel at the 2002 CES last January, I requested a pair for review.