Nevada had a real pair of senators.
Harry Reid, our senior public servant has parlayed his political 'skills' into to some whopping land deals that started out with crap land and ending up with jewels of the valley. He's 30-40 million dollar man who has just coincidentally had the biggest developers sell him land that coincidentally later became developmental gold.
John Ensign, it will turn out, is not merely an adulterer, but a serial adulterer, who is blah blah blah Christian leadership, blah blah blah Promise Keeprs...
I think Diogenes would take a pass on both these cards.
How's your state?
_________________
Anyway, penises in orifices not belonging to spouses seems quite a bipartisan affair. In the last year, America has found BOTH Ensign and Edwards to be aptly named...John.
Do y'all care?
Should politicians live by the Charles Barkley credo, "I ain't your damn role model?" Should they get a pass and just leave it at "Do as I say, not as I screw?"
It sure seems there is no shortage of guys willing to "poll the electorate," so to speak.
The main worry I have is that these people are making a shambles of heterosexual marriage. On the one hand, the holy union of matrimony is easily tossed aside while someone like Senator Ensign yammers about Nevada's "Defense of Marriage" bill banning gay marriage, while, on the other hand, he's boning chicks on his payroll. Dude, if you wanna defend fuckin' marriage, don't break Commandments specifically discussing adultery AND coveting thy neighbor's wife.
Ensign has knocked off one fifth of the Ten Commandments while at the helm of the Senate Christian group!
So, adultery is one of the Ten Big Rules, but do we even care, just so long as it's between a man and a woman?
Nevada had a real pair of senators.
Harry Reid, our senior public servant has parlayed his political 'skills' into to some whopping land deals that started out with crap land and ending up with jewels of the valley. He's 30-40 million dollar man who has just coincidentally had the biggest developers sell him land that coincidentally later became developmental gold.
John Ensign, it will turn out, is not merely an adulterer, but a serial adulterer, who is blah blah blah Christian leadership, blah blah blah Promise Keeprs...
I think Diogenes would take a pass on both these cards.
How's your state?
_________________
Anyway, penises in orifices not belonging to spouses seems quite a bipartisan affair. In the last year, America has found BOTH Ensign and Edwards to be aptly named...John.
Do y'all care?
Should politicians live by the Charles Barkley credo, "I ain't your damn role model?" Should they get a pass and just leave it at "Do as I say, not as I screw?"
It sure seems there is no shortage of guys willing to "poll the electorate," so to speak.
The main worry I have is that these people are making a shambles of heterosexual marriage. On the one hand, the holy union of matrimony is easily tossed aside while someone like Senator Ensign yammers about Nevada's "Defense of Marriage" bill banning gay marriage, while, on the other hand, he's boning chicks on his payroll. Dude, if you wanna defend fuckin' marriage, don't break Commandments specifically discussing adultery AND coveting thy neighbor's wife.
Ensign has knocked off one fifth of the Ten Commandments while at the helm of the Senate Christian group!
So, adultery is one of the Ten Big Rules, but do we even care, just so long as it's between a man and a woman?