1. RJR says that the previous NHT SB3 was "bass-reflex". It was not. Not sure how he made that mistake after owning them for three or four years!
2. He said:
"The Nola Mini had a natural midrange as well as extended and detailed highs. Midrange inner detail was more revealing through the Nola, however, and its bass extension and high-level dynamic capabilities were superior to the those of the NHT Three." (The Nola is better, but the Nola is better"?!?)
But I'm 95% sure, based on context he actually meant this:
"The Nola Mini had a natural midrange as well as extended and detailed highs. Midrange inner detail was more revealing through the NHT, however, and its bass extension and high-level dynamic capabilities were superior to the those of the Nola Mini."
Especially since he specifically references the "bass extension and high level dynamic capabilities" as NHT's major strengths in the paragraph before *and* after this one. Me thinks RJR needs to get more sleep. He's apparently delirious.
1. RJR says that the previous NHT SB3 was "bass-reflex". It was not. Not sure how he made that mistake after owning them for three or four years!
2. He said:
"The Nola Mini had a natural midrange as well as extended and detailed highs. Midrange inner detail was more revealing through the Nola, however, and its bass extension and high-level dynamic capabilities were superior to the those of the NHT Three." (The Nola is better, but the Nola is better"?!?)
But I'm 95% sure, based on context he actually meant this:
"The Nola Mini had a natural midrange as well as extended and detailed highs. Midrange inner detail was more revealing through the NHT, however, and its bass extension and high-level dynamic capabilities were superior to the those of the Nola Mini."
Especially since he specifically references the "bass extension and high level dynamic capabilities" as NHT's major strengths in the paragraph before *and* after this one. Me thinks RJR needs to get more sleep. He's apparently delirious.