Sorry, I can't help you with the Fisher. No doubt, someone else can and will. I can warn you to stay away from the BangOlafson. Had one once long ago. It was no better than OK sonically, even when mounted with their top cartridge. Even if you're willing to settle for "OK" because of a price advantage, getting a pristine cartridge will probably turn out to be a built-in problem. You're stuck with B/O cartridges which may not be available now.

Since money is at a premium check out this site for Moth.

http://britaudio.com/Products5.html

also check with www.underwoodhifi.com for Music Halls.

I'd wait a little longer, get up another couple hundred and go for the Music Hall MMF-5. Audio Advisor will set you up with a new one, cartidge (pretty good one too - MM) included, ready to upack and play some pretty fine sound for $566. You'll be two notches above that B/O.

Before I get too free with your budget, what do you have waiting downstream for a new turntable? Are you set with a phono input on your preamp?

I thought about replying the other day, but, figured someone else would explain it a bit better. Since no one has addressed this in detail yet, I'll make an attempt.

The problem with budget linear tracking turntables is that the arm relies on inertia and will tend to drag along on one wall of a groove more than the other, and any built in servo correction cannot compensate in time to be truly useful. Most of the better linear tracking arms have air pumps that float the arm on a cushion of air to significantly reduce this drag. Unless you're spending the big bucks for one of these, you might actually end up damaging your LPs more with a budget linear arm than a properly set up pivot one.

The best bang for the buck probably is the Music Hall MMF-5 for the quality you seek. You might also be happy with a MMF-2.1 (or its equivalents from other companies.)

While it may be a good idea to stay away from the battery powered phono preamp that Circuit City was pushing you, don't dismiss a battery powered unit just because it's battery powered. There are lots of audiophile products that specifically use battery power for a lower noise level.

First the moth turtables are the OEM Regas ie Goldring and since you said money was an issue the basic Moth/RB250 = to P2 is $399/NAD533. The = P3 is the Moth x with glass platter/RB300 arm is much less than the Goldring 2. I was hoping you would see between the lines. Go to www.needledoctor.com and pick your cartridge of your choice. The MMF5 is plug and play and is great bang for the buck. At www.underwoodhifi.com Walter usually has a MMF5 demo with low hours that has a good discount on it. It is a no brainer if you want plug and play. Music Halls are easy to set up. If you need a phono stage the $100 Music Hall is just fine to start with. It has the same circuit board as the flat box Goldring, which was the old Project Phono Box until they updated their line. It can handle MM or MC. Good luck.

You didn't call Walter did you???????

Record Doctor 3 record cleaning machine from audioadvisor $229.

Hi Derek - I think Mikey Fremer is a better source of info on this:

http://stereophile.com/tonearms/804kuzma/

The issue may be more one of tracking errors, as opposed to record wear... but, I would think tracking errors might imply wear.

How much better is a record cleaning machine than a $25 cleaning brush? About two orders of magnitude, I'd say. You're going to want a cleaning machine. Jim T has given you the best bang for the buck, and probably the best overall source for "new to vinyl" guys with good taste and startup budgets. You can, obviously, get to Audio Advisor on the net, but I'd recommend you call them on the phone. They're a pretty helpful bunch with questions like yours.

You'll want to keep your cleaning machine in the basement or utility room with the furnace and such. I do, and, as I recall, MF does too. They're loud, and not terribly pretty, but they're more than worth it, especially when you're dealing with older records that might not have had tender loving care in the past.

The tonearm will drift into the run off groove of the LP. LPs vary as to how close the groove comes to the label. You'll have to get up and lift the arm or cringe when you hear the loud popping sound of the stylus in the groove. There's a product made to lift the arm for you on manual tables:

http://www.elusivedisc.com/prodinfo.asp?number=EXPLIFTC

If fully manual for the TT is an issue you may look at the fully auto Thorens TD 190 with Ortofon Cartridge (OM 10) or some of the Dual models which are semi-auto and will bring the arm back to rest at the end of play. The Needle Doctor sells both. The overall quality is not up to the Regas or the Music Hall MMF5. If you are looking at the lower end Music Halls then they are as good.

Yes, on a fully manual turntable, you do have to activate the arm-lift and return the arm to its rest. You don't really have to hurry that much. If that inconvenience is built in, I hear you say, then why are most turntables above entry level fully manual? Because vinyl is all about DELIBERATELY LISTENING TO MUSIC. If you're doing that, you'll know when it is over. If you're not, the best bet is to stick to the little silver discs. They have their place. That's one reason why most of us have made provision for both analog and digital front ends in our systems. Others have offered optional suggestions including automatic turntables and aftermarket lifts, and those will do the job - with some inherent tradeoffs in quality, but if needing to be attentive to the music is a deal breaker, you should probably get someone to convert your old vinyl to digital (lots of hobbyists and some professionals will do that for less than your investment in an analog front end) and be happy listening the way you like to. Isn't that what it is all about anyway?

Just got this turntable off of Craigslist. Sounded slow, cleaned the belt, track and motor hub. Speed normalized at first but then slowed again. Was looking to replace belt. Will MT730 fit MT 728? Any other suggestions besides "caveat emptor" appreciated. Thanks