|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Onkyo DX-7555 CD player:
I don't have a copy of the Telarc 1812 Overture—which, whatever its sonic qualities, is possibly the most boring interpretation of the work on record—but I do have a Telarc sampler featuring recordings from that period, and the DX-7555's presentation of orchestral sound was very pleasing, the string sections of orchestras sounding much like . . . well, string sections, and avoiding the squeaky chalk-on-a-blackboard effect that bad digital sound can produce. Just for old times' sake, I also played 42nd Street. That was fine, too, except for the tap-dancing bits, which came across more as sound effects than as real tap. (This is very likely the fault of the recording itself; microphones have a difficult time capturing the sound of tap.) I played my usual reference CDs: the Chesky Records Jazz Sampler and Audiophile Test Compact Disc, Vol.1 (Chesky JD37); Mickey Hart's Planet Drum (Rykodisc RCD-10206); and Sylvia McNair's Sure Thing: The Jerome Kern Songbook (Philips 442 129-2). There were no surprises, and the aural fatigue factor was again kept to a minimum, but there was somewhat less of a sense of detail and transparency than I've heard before with these recordings. Before I discuss specific comparisons with other CD players, I should talk about the effect of changing the DX-7555's digital filter characteristics. You'll recall that the Onkyo's Setup mode allows selection of filter slopes: Sharp (steep) or Slow (gradual). These appear to correspond to the Measuring and Listening options of the Ayre CX-7e CD player, and, as I note in the sidebar, I prefer the sound of the Ayre with this switch in the Listening position. With the Onkyo, however, my preference was the opposite: the Slow setting (corresponding to the Ayre's Listening setting) was very laid-back, with somewhat better spatial definition, but it was just too soft-sounding—at least in my system, and for my taste. I went back and forth several times between the two settings, using different CDs, and preferred Sharp every time. All of my comments about the sound of the DX-7555 are based on its filter slope being set to Sharp. Trying to determine the contribution to a system's sound of only one of its components is no easy task, and although introducing a new component into a familiar system is a good start at getting a handle on that product's sound, I think it's important to make direct comparisons with other components. In this case, I had two other digital sources on hand: the Ayre CX-7e, my new reference for high-end CD players (see sidebar); and the Marantz DV8400, a DVD-Video/Audio/SACD/CD player that I've had in my home theater for the last few years, and which was described by Kal Rubinson, in his "Music in the Round" column of May 2004 (Vol.27 No.5), as "a capable performer offering balanced sound, extended frequency range, and good soundstage imaging and depth," though he noted that it "lacked a little in dynamics." In making these comparisons, I tried to control potentially confounding variables: I used the same pair of interconnects for each player or, where the comparison involved balanced outputs/inputs, balanced interconnects of the same make, model, and length. I matched output levels to within ±0.1dB, measuring voltage at the amplifier output using the sinewave level signal on Stereophile's first Test CD (Stereophile STPH002-2), and using the volume control of my PS Audio GCC-100 integrated amplifier. The outputs of the Onkyo and the single-ended Ayre were pretty close to begin with, but the Ayre's balanced output was considerably higher, and the Marantz's single-ended output was quite a bit lower without compensation. Comparing the single-ended output of the Ayre with the Onkyo, with their levels matched, it didn't require a great deal of intensive listening to conclude that, as good as the Onkyo was, the Ayre was in a different league. The CX-7e revealed more instrumental detail and a wider, deeper soundstage, with more precise spatial definition of instruments and voices within the stage. Music reproduced by the Ayre was more engaging, with a dynamic thrust that made the Onkyo sound slow in comparison (and remember, this was not with the Onkyo's digital filter set to Slow). The Ayre achieved this without its sound becoming too forward or clinical—a difficult balance for any audio component to achieve. The Ayre's treble was not more extended than the Onkyo's in any obvious way, but the bells and other treble percussive instruments on track 3 of the Chesky test disc had a more pristine clarity through the Ayre. The bass was seemingly deeper in extension, and more clearly defined—an effect particularly evident when I played Mickey Hart's Planet Drum. These differences were even more obvious when the comparison was with the Ayre's balanced output, this no doubt related to the fact that the PS Audio GCC-100's circuitry is also fully balanced. Dynamics were more powerful still, a related effect being that, after listening to a CD on the Onkyo, and then to the same disc on the Ayre via its balanced outputs, the sound actually seemed louder. I even checked my settings to make sure I hadn't somehow failed to correctly match the levels, but the settings were correct. The Ayre CX-7e sells for $2950, almost five times the price of the Onkyo DX-7555, so it should sound better. It definitely does. Comparing the Onkyo DX-7555 with the Marantz DV8400 was a different story. I seldom listen to CDs in my home-theater system, but when I have, my impression of the Marantz has been much like Kal's: "a capable performer," indeed. This impression persisted when I listened to the Marantz in my two-channel system, but when I switched to the Onkyo, it was apparent that the Onkyo had better dynamics, greater clarity, and more extended treble—call it a more-than-capable performer. Of course, the Onkyo plays only CDs—the Marantz also plays DVDs (with excellent video quality), DVD-As, and SACDs, and a good deal of its $1695 cost is to pay for these capabilities. Still, considering the DV8400 as only a CD player, I felt the Onkyo was superior.
The end of the road
Footnote 1: My system at the time consisted of a Linn turntable and tonearm and, I think, a Supex cartridge; a Conrad-Johnson PV-2ar tube preamp; a Luxman MQ-68c tube power amplifier for the top and a Bryston 3B solid-state amp for the bottom; and original Quad speakers paired with Cizek MG-27 subwoofers. The sound was uncommonly smooth, and not prone to exaggerating faults in the source.
Article Continues: Specifications »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

