"What do you know about the Belt Mechanisms?"
Seems a very simple, quite honest question to me.
Not the question you asked. Not a very good question either since it is overly vague. But anyhooo....
You complain they are not to your liking,
I conplained that they were loaded and unreasonable.
well, what do you know about them that is not to your liking????????
You presume they were "not to my liking" when in fact I simply could not discern any differences with the particular Belt tweeks in and out of my system. What I "did not like" about them was how they looked. Given that I could not detect any sonic improvement my only aesthetic opinion was they looked bad.
What exactly are the mechanisms that you feel are "very, very unlikely"?
The one that can be found on the PWB website that I quoted in this thread.
Does it rely on autosuggestion for P.W.B. devices and techniques to work ?
No - The devices are actually superimposing a 'friendly' energy pattern on any object which they are attached to.
Have the P.W.B. devices had some special treatment ?
Yes - The devices have been specially treated to provide 'friendly', 'relaxing' energy patterns."
Those are your words, Scott, we can call them up again if need be. If you truly insist on weaseling out of another group of words you've strung together without basis for complaint, we can pull them up and show them to you again. You said them, now defend them.
Yeah. Consider them defended. I have cited the mechanisms that are claimed on the P.W.B. website that I believe to be very very unlikely actual mechanisms for the percieved improvements claimed in connection with P.W.B. tweeks. "Friendly energy patterns." WTF would that be?
Did a quick search...
Didn't see any references other than Belt related ones much less any scientific papers on "friendly energy patterns" or anything on the subject. It would seem that this is an invention of the Belts. So what is it? Is it energy? If so what sort of energy? Stored? Kinetic? What is it's source? Electromagnetism? Gravity? the weak force? the strong force?
They do exist, you know, the Belt mechanisms.
Yes I do know that the mechanisms for the perception of improved sound does exist with the P.W.B. tweeks. All such perceptions have mechanisms of cause. I have already clearly stated as much.
All I'm trying to find out is whether you have any idea what it is you are complaining about. That is a perfectly fair question to ask any birther/deather and any good b/d'er can at least regurgitate the BS they have been provided. It appears you can't even do that much.
You have your answer now don't you. Consider the mechanisms as described on the P.W.B. website officially "regurgitated." Of course you already had that answer since I am now quoting the same bit from the P.W.B. website as I did earlier.
To make anything more of my question than what it is is to be dishonest in the extreme. You like tossing around the word "bullshit". Well, bullshit is what I see coming from you with every post. Calling me an idiot only says you have no answer for a very, very simple question.
Who called you an idiot? I "presented" a question that was a parody of your questions. I even explained explicitly that it was a paradoy to make a point! Nothing more nothing less. It was to make a point about the nature of your questions. But if you didn't get that then......
Calling me an idiot only proves you to be a dining room table.
OK........ yeah, you are arguing with a diningroom table. as would any sane person.....
There is no "do you still beat your wife" aspect to it. I'm not asking you when you started learning about Belt or stopped learning about Belt or whether you continue to learn about Belt. There is nothing criminal or highly immoral about what you do or do not know when it comes to Belt - you've said so yourself.
Just because you don't get it doesn't mean it aint so. but anyway You have finally asked a reasonable question "What exactly are the mechanisms that you feel are "very, very unlikely"?" and you have your answer. The answer that had already been provided, but oh well.....
And your response does nothing to satisfy me about a test. You demand May put forth a test that satisfies you.
Yes if she wants to convince me of her assertion about "happy energy patterns" she needs to explain WTF that means given the term is an apparent invention of the Belts with no mention I can find in any scientifi related literature and then show evidence that this is the mechanism by which people percieve an improvement in the sound. Of course the test I find painfully missing is a pretty simple one. The test that would eliminate bias as the cause.
Well, in equal portion, I ask that you put forth a test that satisfies me. No beating anyone, no asking for personal data - just asking for a test. You say they are quite easy to construct.
They are. So first we have to get some explanation of what the alleged physical phenomenon "friendly energy patterns" is refering to. Then we can construct a test for it's presence with the Belt tweeks and their effect on the perceptions of those using them.
You're so very good at insisting on answers to your demands and insisting those answers are easy to produce.
Let's get some answers here, Scott, before someone sets a hot dinner plate down on you.
You got your answer to your one reasonable question. Now we have to find out just WTF the Belts mean by "happey energy patterns." given it is a term they seem to have invented.