|
Recent Additions
Budget Components
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Wilson Audio Specialties WATT/Puppy 7 loudspeaker
When I interviewed recording engineer Roy Halee (Simon and Garfunkel, The Byrds, The Lovin' Spoonful, etc.) at his home in Connecticut back in 1991, he pointed to his pair of monolithic Infinity IRS loudspeakers and said, "When I want to listen for pleasure, I listen to those." He then pointed to a pair of early-edition Wilson Audio Specialties WATT/Puppys in a second system set up in the corner of his large listening room. "When I want to hear what's on a recording I've made, I listen to those." It was obvious: Halee respected the Wilsons, but he loved the Infinitys. Not surprising, since Dave Wilson designed the WATT section to be a highly accurate portable monitor, and monitors are designed for respect, not love. A Wilson's website claims that the WATT/Puppy is the best-selling over-$10,000 loudspeaker in history. I have no way of verifying that claim, nor can I figure out how Wilson can make itprivately held companies are under no obligation to reveal sales figures. But any speaker that's been in constant production in one iteration or another for more than 17 years, as the WATT/Puppy has, must have impressive stats, "best-selling" or otherwise. Somebody besides recording engineers must love them. Self-setup not recommended If you're relatively new to this hobby, you may have seen a number of speakers that look like the WATT/Puppyboth in shape and driver configuration. Many companies market speakers with flattened pyramidal tops and dual-woofered rectangular bottoms, while others offer standalone speakers that look like just the top WATT section. But rest assuredto my knowledge, no speaker had this look before the WATT. The WATT/Puppy is the original. All of the othersamong them the Joseph Audio Pearl and the Genesis Vare, to one degree or another, imitators. Wilson's excellent setup guide includes specific vertical angling requirements for the WATT, based on the height and distance from the speaker of the listener's ears. Wilson provides four sets of rear spikes for the Puppy so that you can adjust the system's height to ensure that the WATT's tweeter and midrange driver are at the correct height relative to your ears. Guesswork is eliminated: Plug in the numbers, and Wilson tells you which set of spikes to use. Before packing them up, John Atkinson measured the distance between the speakers and my listening chair and the height of my ear canal from the floor, so he could duplicate them in his measurements. While time coherence is claimed for the WATT/Puppy 7, phase coherence is not. (Wilson says that no speaker passes a squarewave unchanged.) When you spend $22,000 on a pair of speakers, you're entitled to professional setup. All Wilson Audio dealers are trained in this service, which they're required to provide when you buy a pair of Wilson speakers. But after Peter McGrath had futzed around for a few hours, the speakers had been moved barely 2" from where I'd plopped them down originally. Still, their bottom-end performance had improved dramatically, and that affected the entire presentation. $22,400 for WATT?
Article Continues: Page 2 »
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


few years later, I attended a session at Sony Studios at which audio journalists listened to a live mike feed of a jazz trio through a pair of WATT/Puppys. At the turn of a switch, we could hear the same feed converted to 16-bit/44.1kHz digital, 16/44.1 processed with 20-bit Super Bit Mapping (SBM), 24/96, and 1-bit/2.83MHz via a prototype DSD (SACD) converter. We were told that the Wilson speakers had been chosen for their revealing nature. They revealed to many of us that the DSD conversion sounded closest to the mike feed, while to othersthe real "experts"it all sounded the same.