|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Revel Ultima Studio loudspeaker
The Revel Ultima Studios came to me by chance. I'd wanted to review Revel's high-value Performa F-30see my May 2000 reportbut the Studio was offered instead. By the time a pair of Studios had arrived, however, the F-30s were also on their way, and the Studios were put on the back burner. Because of the mix-up, I thought the Studios would be freebiesjust listen for a while and send 'em back. I am now obliged to do the honest thing and fess up in public: Many months have passed and the Studios are still here. Some months ago, but well after the Studios had been set up, I visited the Revel factory and learned of the psychoacoustic investigations that precede the design of their speakers. Harman International, of which Revel is a part, is a big enough company to support a lab dedicated to investigating loudspeaker performance through the studyin controlled experimental environmentsof how trained listeners perceive the various parameters of sound reproduction. The Harman facility includes workstations where employees practice the identification and description of sounds, as well as a most impressive controlled-listening lab, all under the supervision of Floyd Toole and Sean Olive. Panels of trained listeners can compare prototype and production speakers and help determine the relative audibilities of distortions, frequency deviations, phase shifts, and variations in polar response. With these data it becomes possible to construct a hierarchy of parameters in terms of their acoustic importance, and to correlate variations of parameter magnitude with audibility. Thus, when Kevin Voecks, Revel's Director of Research and Technology, and head of engineering Domenic Buonincontri began to build actual speakers, they had a cost/benefit worksheet for the audibility of many of the performance criteria. They knew that, despite common intuition, narrowband (high Q) frequency deviations of relatively high amplitude color the sound less than broadband (low Q) deviations of lower amplitude. They knew that, in a real listening room, perfect on-axis frequency response is of little value if the off-axis response is loading the room (and the listener) with a highly irregular spectrum. They knew how the subjective satisfaction of reducing harmonic and intermodulation distortion to sub-threshold values was related to improvements in the phase response. They knew, too, at what point one important parameter had been made sufficiently good that it was time to concentrate on another. Because the consumer has to be able to afford the results, it's significant that Revel knew which priorities were meaningful, and where to focus its efforts (and Harman's money) when it came time to actually build something. Reality My Studios, in gloss black with rosewood side panels, blend just fine with our mix of period and modern furniture. At least, that's what my wife says, and I'm happy to accept her opinion. The general quality of fit and finish is outstanding. Without spikes, the Studios were as solidly stable as some other spiked speakers; with spikes, they seemed welded to the floor.
Article Continues: Page 2 »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


Theory