|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio J. Gordon Holt
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters CES 2010 RMAF 2009 SSI 2009 CES 2009 RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Revel Performa F30 loudspeaker:
As noted above, strings were generally beautifully presented, but on a few recordings they could take on an unnatural edge. The second movement of Shostakovich's Symphony 1 (Bernstein/CSO, DG 427 632-2) has long been one of my standard test recordings: it offers a wide dynamic range, from pianissimo strings to forte brass, and employs all the orchestral choirs as well as a piano. The F30 was up to the task in every way but one: Near the end of the movement, the violins' high sostenuto cut too hard. Perhaps this was related to the overtone structure of strings as compared with brass, or to the brass's more distant placement. I briefly thought that, just perhaps, what I heard through the F30 was really what's on the disc. After all, the strings are quite steely on a number of Bernstein's live DG recordings. But this unpleasantness was not apparent with the Ultima Studios or the smaller Soliloquy 5.3s when they occupied the same spots in my listening room. Conclusions Because of its potential, I subjected the F30 to great scrutiny, and the weight of my comments may thus seem negative. But my conclusion is that little distinguishes the F30 from the very top class: Its moderately light tonal balance limits its ability to (re)create a semblance of authority. It's unfair to say that it was overly bright, because its treble was not harsh or peaky. Neither is it fair to say that it lacked a strong bottom end, because it was capable of producing taut, room-shaking bass. Yet despite its frequency-response specs, the F30 seemed to perform as if it had a slightly tilted balance—the treble a bit up, the bass a bit down—some of which I can ascribe to my listening room. While it might not have been perfect for my room, I predict that the Performa F30 will be sensational in a warmer, more complementary acoustic.
Article Continues: Specifications »
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



