Why does it have to be such a black and white thing? How about we accpet peoples' perceptions as their perceptions. Why do we have to decide if they are anything more?
Ummm... is it backwards day, and nobody told me? Shouldn't that be MY line, since you're the one who's been arguing otherwise?
A real skeptic understands the nature of anecdotal evidence. Real skeptics understand and accept the lack of certitude in the human experience.
Uh-huh. Whereas a real scientist understands that when you have as much anecodotal evidence as some of things that skeptics have been skeptical of here, it becomes statistical evidence.
OK so just to be clear. You are not interested in reading it. So you won't complain about not having it in the future then will you?
Sorry, no can do mi amigo. I reserve the unenviable inalienating right to complain about anything. At any time. To any one. Ad infinitum. And a day.