I get what you're trying to say J.V. but it goes both ways.
I don't care if you hear what you say you hear, fine by me.
Saying we haven't figured out how this stuff works is the easy way out. If Ethan explains a very plausible way how the demag. tweak doesn't work, he gets insulted, yet none of the believers can explain in any meaningful way how it does work.
First, "explaining" how something "doesn't work" is a bit ludicrous particularly as practiced by someone who isn't the slightest bit interested in finding out if something does work. You'll have to show me where this is actually done. Making the assumption nothing has changed simply because Winer doesn't know how to measure it only plays to a very small crowd. Not investigating anything at all is the really easy way out.
Now explaining how something does work, like GoogleEarth, so he can look in someone's front yard and posting fake information meant specifically to insult another forum member or constantly insulting another forum member's audio system or a soft porn video that exposes the hypocrisy of "helping abused women" deserves more than an another insult in return - but Winer is allowed to stay on the forum no matter.
Second, Winer doesn't give a moment's breath to how something does this or that, Winer insults everyone who is involved in this hobby with his tired, worn out uber-cynic act and his constant declarations of "bullshit", "fraud", etc. It is only the occasional uber-absurdity he unwittingly provides - such as the image of a white haired guy in his 60's vigorously shaking his computer while watching files load - that keeps Winer from being wholly McCarthyistic.
Nixonian? Undoubtedly so! Being on Winer's "enemys list" is a laugh a minute.
LOL! Truly, LOL!!!
Third, Winer can speak for himself. He doesn't need your help, only your little puppy dog licks to the back of his hand.
However, the arrogant concept of "believers" speaks for itself. You cannot even see what is in front of you. I am not the others so, if I as a hobbyist don't care to have some easy explanation or method to measure how a specific treatment or action operates, say, one of the Belt pens, that in no way means others do not have a workable explanation. Quite a few such explanations have been provided on this forum - though you've obviously ignored them - and they always receive the same welcome. What those explanations always receive is a group of naysayers who cannot get out of their little comfort zone to simply consider something fresh or different and who instead choose to insult that working explanation and all the professional reviewers and dedicated hobbyists who have found similar results and call all of them "charlatans", "snake oil salesmen", "liars" and so on. Invariably, the vast majority who choose to insult the possibility something might operate as explained haven't even taken the time to try what they ridicule or, like FC, they construct a device that can only show what they want it to show.
Has he done the listening part yet? Or has the waveform test Winer says can't indicate change already proven to him nothing has changed? No need to listen then, eh?
Go bone up on your Dudley.