Audio Streams #10 Page 2

To clarify: In Player mode, the N1A assigns an IP address to your network player—you can think of that relationship as a closed mini-network. It's also worth noting that, when the N1A is in Player mode, you can't connect to it from your computer to copy files to the Melco's internal storage because it resides on its own closed mini-network. Melco recommends using the N1A's USB input for that purpose. As I understand it, the benefit of Player mode is to isolate the N1A from network traffic and noise.

Bits and Bolts
In addition to connecting to a USB DAC, the three rear-panel USB ports offer additional functionality. The port labeled USB 3.0 is for importing music from external USB storage; Expansion is for adding additional USB storage should the N1A's own 4TB not be enough; and Backup is for backing up all your music and configuration data to an external USB storage device. Also on the rear panel is an IEC inlet for the included power cord.

On the front panel, from left to right, are: the on/off switch (the boot process takes about 20 seconds); a USB 2.0 port for playing music from a connected USB storage device; an OLED display that shows system and playback data; and four buttons (Back, Enter, Scroll Down, Scroll Up) for accessing the N1A's menu commands, as well as rudimentary playback from internal storage when using a USB DAC. Everything that lights up on the N1A, including the display and LEDs, can be dimmed or shut off.

The N1A runs on Twonky 7 server software, and supports all popular file formats in PCM resolutions up to 32-bit/384kHz, and DSD up to 5.6MHz. (Melco says that DSD playback will be extended to 11.2MHz in the near future.) If your DAC doesn't do DSD, the N1A can convert DSD to PCM via USB, though this option is unavailable via Ethernet streaming. If you want to play DSD files via Ethernet, you need to install the MinimServer software on the N1A. And if you like to dig into the nitty-gritty, a 57-page owner's manual is available from Melco's website.

Melco's efforts to keep noise out of the data path include a separate, isolated power supply for the light-piped LAN ports, which are entirely electrically isolated by ALT Series Pulse Transformers from TDK. Using an NDK ultra-low-jitter clock, the N1A also reclocks all data before sending it on its way. The N1A's rigid metal case measures 17.2" wide by 2.8" high by 13.9" deep and weighs 15.4 lbs. It sits on wooden footers, and its front panel is a nice chunk of aluminum in black or silver. I find the overall look and feel sturdy and workmanlike—a no-nonsense, bottom-of-the-rack look.

Setting up the N1A and getting music into it was a breeze. I keep a backup of my NAS-based music library on a USB drive, so I simply connected that to the Melco and said "OK." Using my iMac, I also dragged and dropped to the N1A new music purchased after that initial transfer. For geographically fortunate customers (footnote 2), Melco's Downloader app allows you to download music you've purchased from highresaudio.com and ototoy.jp directly to the N1A.

The system for this review included my newly acquired Ayre Acoustics AX-5 Twenty integrated amplifier (yeah!) driving a loaner pair of preproduction DeVore Fidelity X speakers. I have music libraries stored on a Synology 412+ NAS and a QNAP HS-210 NAS. DACs and other details divulged below.

The Easy Part
The Melco N1A Buffaloed my combination of MacBook Pro and Synology NAS. It destroyed them, embarrassed them, gave them a good schooling. Music sounded obviously—frighteningly—more refined, more spacious, and more natural through the N1A. End of story. I can't imagine anyone in this universe who does nothing else while listening to music making the same comparison and not hearing this difference.

I could torture myself—and you, and everyone else—trying to logically suss out the reasons for this great improvement in sound. Is it X? Or Y? Or XYZ and ABC? To my way of thinking, unless you plan on building your own N1A system, why fret? The proof is in the listening. So I listened to the Melco N1A as a server using a number of DACs, including my reference Auralic Vega ($3499) and the lovely Metrum Acoustics Musette ($1399). The differences remained clear as stated above, regardless of which was converting my bits.

I also used the N1A as a NAS feeding a T+A MP 2000 R network player ($7500), which allowed me to do a few things. I could easily switch from serving up my music via the Melco, a review-sample Antipodes DS server ($2700 with 1TB HDD), and my NAS (Synology or QNAP). In order of sonic preference, the Melco nudged out the Antipodes DS—quite a feat, seeing as the Antipodes is no slouch in terms of sound. Through the Melco, music sounded that much more crisp, refined, and natural. While the Antipodes does things the Melco doesn't (it has an onboard DAC, for one), the Melco costs $1500 less.

The Melco pretty much creamed both of my NASes, too, though not as much as it had my MacBook-NAS. Music opened up more, sang out more truly, let me get into it more deeply. I was sighing to solo violin—I really got into Arthur Grumiaux's recording of J.S. Bach's Sonatas and Partitas for Solo Violin (2 CDs, Philips 438 736)—dancing with Tom Waits and the Birthday Party, grooving to the US Girls' Half Free (CD, 4AD 3520), and getting all down and funky with Fille Qui Mousse. Jazz was jazzier—Cecil McBee and Jacques Coursil sounded more solid, weighty, and lifelike. The Melco N1A stripped away layers of digital's nastier stuff, including harshness, flatness, and unnaturalness. Niceness!

Using the Melco in Player mode with the T+A doing player duties delivered the most appealing sound of all. But—and it's a big but—I can't live without a real graphic user interface. Turning a knob, or tapping Next on a remote, is no way to browse a 1000-plus-album library for this music lover; I could see that kind of behavior leading to some new twitch, like a baseball player waiting for the pitch.

Simply More Musical
I've reviewed a number of music servers, including the Antipodes DX and DS ($6500), the Aurender S10 ($6990) and X100L ($3499), the SOtM sMS-1000SQ ($3000), Digibit's Aria ($6995), and more. It has been my experience that the differences between a stock computer and any of these dedicated servers are varying degrees of improvement of the same aspects of sound: noise floor, dynamics, definition and dimensionality of sound image, microdetail, and, overall, naturalness and degree of engagement (mine).

The Melco N1A is the least expensive server of this bunch, yet I find its sound quality on a par with more expensive models, and in the ballpark with the best costing up to $6000. If you're looking for a server that sounds better than any stock computer can and you want to keep things simple, think Melco.



Footnote 2: Highresaudio.com offers an English version of the site; most downloads are available world-wide, but restrictions apply in some locations. Ototoy.jp does not offer an English version.
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
doak's picture

...from my Aries??
Thanks for easing some of the confusion.
Fascinated with this Melco unit. Simpler=Better,IMO.
Very informative discussion here: http://www.xtremeplace.com/yabbse/index.php?topic=214799.90
Watching Melco's progress with great interest.

deckeda's picture

A good hardware-based player would be critical for me as well. I'm currently drawing a blank at an example of what that would be right now, which everything that's not a Roon solution depends on (for me.)

On the other hand, if there's a way to make something like this work really well with an iPad and configure/add/edit music from the computer I'd gladly allow it on the LAN. I don't care how it sounds if the experience sucks. Can anyone suggest whatever it is I'm overlooking for the solution this box apparently depends on, given my stated priority?

And don't say "CD player."

lardog's picture

Why would music sound different on the same system by using two different devices delivering the same exact digital files? I don't understand that.

Also: can't I just use a NAS as a music server and save my bank account $2000?

michaelavorgna's picture

If you read the 4th paragraph under the "Bits and Bolts" section, you'll see a brief answer to your question. I'd also recommend reading John Atkinson's review of the Antipodes DX Server (http://www.stereophile.com/content/antipodes-dx-reference-music-server) and my review of the Bel Canto REFStream (http://www.audiostream.com/content/bel-canto-refstream-asynchronous-ethernet-renderer) where their manufacturer's talk about this in a bit more detail.

You'll notice that all of these devices, including the Melco, re-clock the data. According to Bel Canto, "We have found that providing the lowest possible jitter audio stream into the DAC is critical to achieving the best sound quality. Our ultra-low noise clocks remove layers of digital grunge and low level noise that impinges on the musicality of the DAC."

In addition, all of these devices address other issues including power supply isolation and noise regulation.

While you could certainly use a NAS for storage, at present you will also need a ControlPoint and a Renderer to play back your music because you cannot simply connect a DAC to a NAS. Many multi-bay NAS also house a fan and in my experience you can typically hear the drives when active so you'll want to keep a NAS away from your hi-fi.

As I shared in this review, the Melco bettered the performance of my NAS/MacBook Pro combo.

Michael Lavorgna
Editor, AudioStream.com

mtymous1's picture

An example of how music sounds different on the same system by using two different devices delivering the same exact digital files, is (drum roll please):
hi-rez streaming via AirPlay vs. via DLNA/UPnP

Depending on the protocols used for streaming, it might even sound different using the SAME devices (more on that in a moment).

It's common knowledge that AirPlay downsamples 96- and 192-kHz files, so obviously this $2K gizmo doesn't use AirPlay to stream your files -- it uses UPnP (http://www.melco-audio.com/technology/). Therefore, the response to your first question is: if you stream a hi-rez file using AirPlay devices, it will sound different than if streamed via the UPnP-based Melco, on the same hi-fi. (Will the Melco make a system sound "$2K better"? Frankly, I do not know -- too many variables and subjectivity to answer.)

RE: "...use a NAS as a music server and save [your] bank account $2000?"
By specifically enlisting DLNA/UPnP protocols, you might be able to do it with your existing equipment. If you need some initial direction on getting DLNA set up, would need to know the make/model of your NAS, as well as the equipment in your stack/rack. (Echo Lavorgna's comment above about a control point and renderer.)

Now, back to my placeholder about different sound using the SAME devices... I have personally experienced qualitatively better sound from *my* equipment when I use DLNA instead of AirPlay. This is especially noticeable when streaming hi-rez files. (Recall AirPlay's downsampling.)

Special note to the trolls and measurement-obsessed:
FWIW, am NOT trying to open up the "bits-are-bits" nor “HDMI vs. USB” nor “jitter” nor any other delivery stream can o' worms here. (There's already PLENTY of that on Lavorgna's Audiostream.) Since I don't own a Melco (nor anything similar to it), I do not have any empirical evidence whatsoever, to either refute or confirm claims about improved SQ by utilizing such a device. The intent of this post is to provide lardog an example of how music sounds different on the same system, and also provide a response to the question of "can't I just use a NAS as a music server and save my bank account $2000?"

Thanks and Happy Listening!

mtymous1's picture

Some very interesting comments associated with yet another Greatest Bits network streamer:
http://www.audiostream.com/content/aurender-n100h-caching-network-streamer

James.Seeds's picture

The Melco NA1 certainly looks like an interesting piece of equipment and the entry at $2000 is somewhat reasonable considering how much more the Antipodes DX and DS starting at ($6500) sounds like a bargain. I took an even less expensive route by going Apple Mac Mini with a Cambridge DAC at less than 1k it sounds better than I anticipated breath new life to a system that was still kicking after a number of years, power supply or fan noise is none existent as a bonus I have it connect to my TV through HDMI for movies and shows, it's worked out well

davidcarr's picture

Hi All,

First and foremost, Michael, thank you for your very thoughtful review, and many kind words!

I thought it might help to clarify one point regarding the behavior of control point software when using a Melco server and an ethernet equipped network player:

The recommended hookup is to use the rear "player" ethernet port connected to the network player directly, and your home network connected to the "LAN" ethernet port. In this configuration, the Melco creates a small internal sub-network for the player that isolates it from the network, thereby improving performance. Your app-based control point software (such as PlugPlayer or the like) will still operate normally, so long as the mobile device used is connected to a WiFi network that is on the same LAN that the Melco is attached to.

Here's the confusing part: Melco offers a misleadingly titled "Player Mode". This is designed for users that want to completely eliminate the need for a home network, using the front panel buttons or optional IR remote to select music instead. While this potentially delivers "ultimate" performance and/or might be suitable where no network is available, we feel that the limitation of functionality makes this mode only applicable to the most diehard listeners. Our recommendation is to avoid the "player mode", and simply connect the Melco to your system as described above. The Melco will still offer far superior performance compared to a standard NAS or laptop/computer-based system, and offer all of the usability features we expect from a file-based streaming audio system.

Everyone is free to email me directly with questions, I'm glad to help!

David Carr
The Sound Organisation- US importer of Melco

david@soundorg.com

AlMaNaAx's picture

Humbly contributing our own two cents. Our music library is stored in ALAC format on a QNAP NAS connected via Ethernet to an Apple Airport Extreme wifi router. We listen to our music by means of an Auralic Aries Mini fetching the audio files through wifi ac, on the 5GHZ band. We never experienced any drops, and we certainly never heard the NAS fan noise interfering with the sound of music playing. The amplifier is an integrated from YBA (french made) and the loudspeakers are Spendor LS3/5a's getting support from a Spendor S-3 subwoofer. It's far from being the world's best, most accurate setup in the world but we still enjoy it every day, several hours per day. It just works and we keep tappin' our feet, kids included.

blugosi's picture

After somehow extensive testing, I have come to the conclusion that the DLNA implementation plays a significant factor.
I keep my 10 Terrabytes library on a Synology 8 bay NAS with 7 hard disks spinning in RAID and JBOD formats. This NAS is located in another room of my house connected to the LAN using Terrabit switches. I am using Jriver MC22 running on an Intel i5 mini PC running 64 bit Windows 10. Its USB output feeds an Antelope Zodiac plus DAC, powered by the proprietary Volticon PSU. The Zodiac connects to my Mcintosh preamp/power amp all tube system and so forth.
The sound quality of that configuration is far better compared to using the DLNA functionality of the Synology. Either from the mini PC, or from my Samsung Smart TV feeding the same DAC via an optical digital link, the sound coming from the DLNA connection is significantly inferior.
The same happens on a different setup, a home PC sending its USB output to my Audeze Deckard headphone amp and Audeze headphones. Streaming through a DLNA connection is not up to streaming directly over Jriver MC.
I can hear no difference when I am streaming the same 24/196 track located on the NAS compared to playing the same track locally from the PC SSD hard disk.
Maybe all these streaming servers improve over non-proprietary links?
I dunno :-)

X