Buddha
Buddha's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 6 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2005 - 10:24am
Speaker question from an Axpona report.
bertdw
bertdw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 4 weeks ago
Joined: Sep 18 2007 - 5:41am

I don't know the specifics of this particular speaker Buddha, but if you have sixteen 8 ohm drivers, you could wire four groups of four in series, then wire these groups in parallel, for a total impedance of 8 ohms. Is that clear? I wish I could draw it for you.

Buddha
Buddha's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 6 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2005 - 10:24am


Quote:
I don't know the specifics of this particular speaker Buddha, but if you have sixteen 8 ohm drivers, you could wire four groups of four in series, then wire these groups in parallel, for a total impedance of 8 ohms. Is that clear? I wish I could draw it for you.

Perfectly clear!

Thanks!

I had been thinking either/or instead of "both!"

ncdrawl
ncdrawl's picture
Offline
Last seen: 13 years 2 weeks ago
Joined: Oct 18 2008 - 9:18am

Roger Russell knows a thing or two about redundant drivers

http://www.ids25.com/

The IDS-25 is a single column of identical wide-range drivers that cover the entire frequency range. The entire frequency range radiates from the same line source.
There are no crossovers, woofers, mids or tweeters.

In addition, there are 25 drivers, each of which will handle at least 10 watts. The entire column will handle 250 watts and still not exceed the single driver power handling.

The heat dissipation capability at high power is outstanding with 25 voice coils per channel. A single coil used in one large woofer is not able to dissipate heat as effectively in comparison.

Also, since the system will handle such high power over the entire frequency range, it means that the mid and high frequency peaks can be handled effortlessly, far better than a system having a single mid-range and tweeter

92.5 sensitivity

20 to 20 response

Freako
Freako's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 weeks ago
Joined: Jan 17 2010 - 8:29am

If I am correct in my assumptions, this would end up as a 4 Ohm load

Freako
Freako's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 weeks ago
Joined: Jan 17 2010 - 8:29am

And like Bert said:

bertdw
bertdw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 4 weeks ago
Joined: Sep 18 2007 - 5:41am

Those won't work Keld. You need two wires to each speaker.

j_j
j_j's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 11 months ago
Joined: Mar 13 2009 - 4:22pm


Quote:
The heat dissipation capability at high power is outstanding with 25 voice coils per channel.

The thing that worries me is the high frequency lobing, directionality, and so on.

How far off axis (up and down) can you get without wierd stuff happening?

Freako
Freako's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 weeks ago
Joined: Jan 17 2010 - 8:29am


Quote:
Those won't work Keld. You need two wires to each speaker.

They are very thin!

Freako
Freako's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 2 weeks ago
Joined: Jan 17 2010 - 8:29am


Quote:

Quote:
The heat dissipation capability at high power is outstanding with 25 voice coils per channel.

The thing that worries me is the high frequency lobing, directionality, and so on.

How far off axis (up and down) can you get without wierd stuff happening?

I agree. The drivers should at least be pointed towards the listener.

bertdw
bertdw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 4 weeks ago
Joined: Sep 18 2007 - 5:41am


Quote:
Roger Russell knows a thing or two about redundant drivers

http://www.ids25.com/
/>

Hmmm... Multiple small, full-range drivers, equalization to compensate for driver roll-off... Sounds like a Bose 901! Okay, not fair, his is a line-source. Like an Infinity IRS. So he holds patents for EQ and line-sources? I hope they're about forty years old, or I could see him landing in court.

To be fair, I haven't read the patents. There may be something unique in there. I just don't see it.

bertdw
bertdw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 4 weeks ago
Joined: Sep 18 2007 - 5:41am

This is strange. From the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Website:

Patent Number 4267205: Process for low-temperature surface layer oxidation of a semiconductor substrate

Patent Number 3705501: Distributor with rotor advance input control

Buddha
Buddha's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 6 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2005 - 10:24am

I know I risk having to turn in my audiophile membership card, but I found many of those prices very off-putting.

I know, everything in audio is worth its price and I'm lucky things don't cost five times what they cost....but, sometimes, I just don't relate to the stuff in my own damn hobby.

bertdw
bertdw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 4 weeks ago
Joined: Sep 18 2007 - 5:41am

Sorry, what prices? The ClairAudient, at $54,000? or the IDS-25, at $18,900? Or something else? You lost me.

Edit: Oh damn, you meant the show report! Never mind...

Log in or register to post comments
-->
  • X