Polk Audio RTi A3 loudspeaker Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

I subjected the RTi A3 to my usual test regime. I used DRA Labs' MLSSA system and a calibrated DPA 4006 microphone to measure the speaker's frequency response in the farfield, and an Earthworks QTC-40 for the nearfield responses. I estimated the Polk's voltage sensitivity at 89.3dB(B)/2.83V/m, which is both high and a little higher than the specified 89dB. This speaker will play loudly with relatively low-powered amplifiers. Fig.1 shows the RTi A3's electrical impedance and phase, plotted against frequency. The impedance drops just below 4 ohms in the lower midrange, and there is a combination of 5 ohms and a –35° phase angle at 120Hz; an amplifier or receiver rated into 4 ohms should work well with the Polk.

Stephen commented on the RTi A3's lively enclosure, and there is a small wrinkle between 200 and 300Hz in the impedance traces that implies the existence of cabinet resonances of some kind. Investigating the panels' vibrational behavior with a plastic-tape accelerometer uncovered a major resonance at 254Hz (fig.2), with lower-level modes visible at 285, 420, 650, 1170, and 1425Hz. The RTi A3's enclosure is larger than the RTi A1's, which allows for a more extended bass performance, but the larger panels will resonate at a lower frequency—which, in theory, should make the panel resonances more audible. However, SM noted no midrange congestion or coloration that might have been the result of so lively an enclosure.

The saddle in the impedance-magnitude trace in fig.1 indicates that the twin ports are tuned to 42Hz, the lowest note of the four-string electric bass guitar, rather than the 50Hz of the smaller RTi A1 (see my measurements of the RTi A1). The red and black traces in fig.3 confirm that the ports' outputs peak between 30 and 70Hz. But, as in the 'A1, the 'A3's ports are afflicted with powerful resonances in the upper midrange. These could be heard as adding a slight whistle to the sound of pink noise, but again it is fair to note that SM didn't comment on any coloration with music. (Polk points out that the port outputs are in opposite phase to one another so should cancel.) The green trace in fig.3 shows that the woofer crosses over to the tweeter (blue trace) between 2 and 4kHz with steep low- and high-pass filter slopes.

Fig.1 Polk RTi A3, electrical impedance (solid) and phase (dashed) (2 ohms/vertical div.).

Fig.2 Polk RTi A3, cumulative spectral-decay plot calculated from output of accelerometer fastened to center of side panel (MLS driving voltage to speaker, 7.55V; measurement bandwidth, 2kHz).

Fig.3 Polk RTi A3, acoustic crossover on HF axis at 50", corrected for microphone response, with nearfield responses of woofer (green trace), front port (black), rear port (red), plotted below 350, 1kHz, 1kHz, respectively.

Fig.4 shows how these individual drive-unit outputs sum in the farfield. The response rise in the upper bass is almost entirely due to the nearfield measurement technique; the RTi A3 offers useful bass output to below 40Hz, which is excellent performance for a relatively small speaker.

Fig.4 Polk RTi A3, anechoic response on HF axis at 50", averaged across 30° horizontal window and corrected for microphone response, with complex sum of nearfield woofer and port responses plotted below 300Hz.

The speaker's balance is commendably even from the lower midrange to the high treble, with the top octave somewhat exaggerated in level. As is usual with a 1" dome tweeter, the Polk's output falls off quite rapidly to the speaker's sides above 10kHz (fig.5); in a room of typical size this will compensate for the rise in on-axis response and result in a neutrally balanced high treble. But in a smaller room such as Stephen's, the on-axis peak in the top octave, perhaps coupled with the slight flare off axis at the base of the tweeter's passband also visible in fig.5, would contribute to his perception of the Polk's "vibrant highs" and "fast transients." In the vertical plane, the RTi A3's dispersion (fig.6) indicates that the speaker needs to be used with stands sufficiently high to place its tweeter level with or just above the listener's ears, as a large suckout develops in the crossover region above the tweeter axis.

Fig.5 Polk RTi A3, lateral response family at 50", normalized to response on HF axis, from back to front: differences in response 90–5° off axis, reference response, differences in response 5–90° off axis.

Fig.6 Polk RTi A3, vertical response family at 50", normalized to response on HF axis, from back to front: differences in response 45–5° above axis, reference response, differences in response 5–45° below axis.

The RTi A3's step response on the tweeter axis (fig.7) shows that both drive-units are connected in positive acoustic polarity, and implies that the best integration of the two will occur just below the tweeter axis. The cumulative spectral-decay plot (fig.8) is superbly clean for such an inexpensive speaker.

Fig.7 Polk RTi A3, step response on HF axis at 50" (5ms time window, 30kHz bandwidth).

Fig.8 Polk RTi A3, cumulative spectral-decay plot on HF axis at 50" (0.15ms risetime).

Like their smaller RTi A1, Polk's RTi A3 demonstrates excellent audio engineering at an affordable price. I just wish its cabinet were not quite so lively and its twin ports not so whistley.—John Atkinson

Company Info
Polk Audio
5601 Metro Drive
Baltimore, MD 21215
(800) 377-7665
Article Contents
Share | |
Comments
kevon27's picture
Lively cabinet... Mod project?

Is there anyway to fix the lively cabinet issue? Fiberglass stuffing? Add some cross bracing?

Gulfvet's picture
Setting Crossover Frequesncies

I am using a Marantz AR6007 with

RTiA3's Front Bi-Amped

RTiA1 Surrounds

PSW125 Sub

Can you reccomend crossover settings?

Thanks!

Site Map / Direct Links