Pete B
Pete B's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 years 3 months ago
Joined: Jul 21 2007 - 11:49am
Locked Threads
smejias
smejias's picture
Offline
Last seen: 13 years 5 months ago
Joined: Aug 25 2005 - 10:29am

Yes. If there's something you'd like to add, however, you can start a new thread.

Lamont Sanford
Lamont Sanford's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 2 months ago
Joined: Mar 31 2006 - 8:32pm


Quote:
Yes. If there's something you'd like to add, however, you can start a new thread.

Yikes!

Pete B
Pete B's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 years 3 months ago
Joined: Jul 21 2007 - 11:49am


Quote:
Yes. If there's something you'd like to add, however, you can start a new thread.

There are a few here who seem to derail perfectly good discussions with deliberate drama because they don't like what they are reading and get the threads closed down.

rvance
rvance's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 years 8 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2007 - 9:58am

Theater People! They're so f**king affected!

j_j
j_j's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 11 months ago
Joined: Mar 13 2009 - 4:22pm

Well, it seems pretty obvious to me that a couple of people home into threads for which they don't like the message, or the message they READ, as opposed to the actual message WRITTEN, and then engage in endless flaming in an attempt to silence others.

For instance, one pseudonymous individual wishes to have everyone who has disagreed publically with his dishonest, abusive nonsense banned from this board. Guess what? I'm entitled to my opinion, and frankly, more entitled than most of you to a directly stated, informed one. Too bad.

A considerable amount of the flaming appears to be intentional well-poisoning and an attempt to prevent productive discussion. I'm not singling out one side in this regard.

tom collins
tom collins's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 7 months ago
Joined: Apr 3 2007 - 11:54am

there are a lot of good folks who had relevant opinions that do not use this board anymore probably for the reason you pointed out. (struts, elk for example)

mrlowry
mrlowry's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 years 1 month ago
Joined: May 30 2006 - 1:37pm

Tom-

I agree. A lot of valuable members haven't posted contributions here much in the last 6-12 months. I'm sure their reasons all differ slightly but I'd say many of them don't enjoy being badgered. Many of the newer, agenda driven members tend to post the same arguments over and over again. Plus they tend to post, many, many times in the same thread after they have clearly stating their opinion. These secondary responses in a thread rarely offer new information and greatly add to the signal to noise ratio.

I'm not advocating limiting people to one post a thread that would be truly draconian. What I am saying is that secondary posts should offer NEW information or the poster shouldn't waste their time or mine.

zane9
zane9's picture
Offline
Last seen: Never ago
Joined: Jan 7 2008 - 6:37pm


Quote:
... Many of the newer, agenda driven members tend to post the same arguments over and over again. Plus they tend to post, many, many times in the same thread after they have clearly stating their opinion...

I would say that mrlowry's characterization more precisely describes older agenda-driven members.The same arguments posted again and again. The same factions endlessly fighting each other.

Like so many audio forums these days, the endless fighting here drives people away.

Compared to many, I am a relatively new member. Apply any draconian concepts to all members.

Log in or register to post comments
-->
  • X