Quote:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/what/

Perpetuation!
A shame he can't make it work
When someone watches.

It doesn't work, so what's to talk about? Demonstrations have been performed as recently as February of this year (they were using a battery):O) Einstein was right even when HE thought he was wrong!

Was thinking the same thing. I can only take about one conspiracy theory essay a week, about 23 less than he usually posts, but at least he seems unlikely to take it out on anybody.

Impossible. Noone invents a perpetuum mobile. Not even in 2010. Can't be done, capiche?

Quote:
Was thinking the same thing. I can only take about one conspiracy theory essay a week, about 23 less than he usually posts, but at least he seems unlikely to take it out on anybody.

You guys are working as a secret cabal to discredit someone's message. I know what you're up to. He was too close to the truth, so you are trying to discredit him.

Quote:
Impossible. Noone invents a perpetuum mobile. Not even in 2010. Can't be done, capiche?

The US patent office does not require models of inventions - except for claimed perpetual motion machines.

There is a reason for this.

Quote:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/what/

And what word mysteriously hides in the company's name??

sTEOrn, that's what!

Coincidence? The facts are all there if you can put the puzzle together!

Quote:

Quote:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/what/

And what word mysteriously hides in the company's name??

sTEOrn, that's what!

Coincidence? The facts are all there if you can put the puzzle together!

Of course!

Thank you for opening our monkey/lizard-brained eyes!

KBK is in on it!

Quote:

Quote:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/what/

And what word mysteriously hides in the company's name??

sTEOrn, that's what!

Coincidence? The facts are all there if you can put the puzzle together!

Yeah, you can't trust them Canadians! I heard that they are using a secret geothermal heating system to keep the snow level down during these Winter Olympics! All just to Validate Global Warming!!!
I say nuke 'em back to Al Gore's backyard!!!
M

Yeah, start with the curling team

We don't need no freakin' geothermal. Just the hot air of you Yanks! Say bye-bye to your hockey gold hopeful, starting tonight!

"Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses. There is no matter." - Albert Einstein

"We are not a human being trying to attain a spiritual experience, but, rather, we are spiritual beings having a human experience. - Telliard deChardin

"Quantum physics has found that there is no empty space in the human cell, but it is a teeming, electric-magnetic field of possibility or potential." - Dr. Deepak Chopra.

You must become 'as an empty bowl'. - Zen Buddhism

[Fill in applause here]

"All the dangers which you have feared, are unnecessary productions of your own mind. Whether you experience Heaven, or Hell, remember - it is your mind which creates them." -unknown

"We do not care about the People's allegiances. All we want is their Fear."

"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death."

"How fortunate for governments that the people they administer do not think." -Adolf Hitler

"Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." - President Woodrow Wilson

I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." - General Douglas MacArthur

Over-unity creates understanding of dimensional realities that extend beyond that of the ken of mortal man. This opens the door, the door that is firmly closed.

There is nothing, nothing in this world, and beyond, that is more threatening to the extant power structure than this sort of understanding.

What are you growin in your hot house up there Ken...it must be some real good shit man !

"As you are probably aware, recent rigorous physics work of Klimov et al. has now completely proven the capability of building physical devices (in his case, very small nanocrystalline solar cells) which directly extract and use excess usable energy from the virtual state. Klimov's work has been rigorously validated by two great independent laboratories: (1) Los Alamos National Laboratory and (2) National Recoverable Energy Laboratory. This rigorously proven work produces a coefficient of performance of performance from 200% to 700%, and this methodology and its proven results is now published in leading physics journals and nanocrystalline journals."

further:

"So one never has to again reprove that real physical systems can extract and use (to power loads) EM energy taken directly from the seething local virtual state vacuum.

One can also further surmise that, if tiny crystals of tourmaline (which are known to continually emit real photons whose energy is also extracted freely from the vacuum) are used as the "photon sources" to freely furnish the input photons to the Klimov microscopic solar cells, then "self-powering" of the Klimov nanocrystalline solar cell system is made possible, with all the system's input photon energy also freely taken from the vacuum via the crazy action of the tourmaline.

If you are really interested in helping solve the pressing world energy crisis, then please note that it is a PHYSICS problem, and not an electrical engineering problem! As you are undoubtedly aware, the sad old electrical engineering model was deliberately crippled by Lorentz (who deliberately symmetrized Heaviside's original equations at the instigation of the infamous J. P. Morgan) in 1892, prior to the very birth of electrical engineering itself. The EEs thus use -- and always have used -- the artificially symmetrized Heaviside-Lorentz equations, not Heaviside's asymmetric equations!

Thus from its inception the present electrical engineering model and technology has been deliberately and diabolically crippled by limiting it to the conception, design, development, and deployment of only self-symmetrizing EM systems -- systems which a priori destroy their own internal source dipoles inside the generator faster than they power their loads."

Morgan did this after getting involved with Tesla, and seeing what Tesla was capable of... he brought Tesla under his influence, and then tore Tesla down. Read Some real history and read it in depth -it might do you some good. Remember, victors always write the History. You know this.

An important point, is that for us to have any energies whatsoever, on the most infinitesimal quantum scale to the most gross scale, energetic systems MUST, ABSOLUTELY MUST be asymmetrical by their very nature. If they are not, then reality, gravity, molecular interactions, chemistry, time, space, thermodynamics, electricity, entropy, chaos, whatever........none of it would exist at all. Nothing. This is patently obvious. How could you miss it?

"There is much more if you are interested. We can easily point out a way in which the EE can use a two-stage switched system in ASYMMETRIC fashion, thus drawing only static potential from the system source dipole and never "drawing current". This is possible because so-called "static voltage" is actually a continuous and steady flow of real photons, extracted from the local vacuum by the proven (since 1957; Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang) ASYMMETRIC interaction of the dipole with the virtual state. A dipole, being a broken symmetry, must automatically receive virtual photons from the vacuum in its seething interaction, excite in the virtual state until the observable state is reached by the excitation, and then decay the excitation by emitting a real photon. It continually does this, so it continually produces the so-called "electrostatic" scalar potential (voltage). As Lee pointed out, whenever we have a broken symmetry (such as a dipole is proven to be), then "something previously virtual has become observable".

If a source is required to furnish only "static" voltage, it can do so forever without storage of very much internal charge.

So by potentializing the external circuit with it in PINNED state momentarily (so that the electrons in the conductors momentarily cannot move as current), one may potentialize the coulombs of pinned charge in the external circuit with static voltage only, and without drawing any current from the primary source. Once the external circuit's pinned charges are potentialized, then one switches away the external dipolar source (while the external circuit is still "pinned"), and the now-open-ended potentialized but-still-pinned external circuit is then recompleted separately (as by switching in a diode and resistor load in series with the diode allowing only the standard complete circular rotation of current.

The "statically potentialized" pinned external circuit has very real energy stored in it; the number of joules of stored potential energy is given by the product of the voltage and the amount of interacting pinned charge so potentialized.

Then the temporary pinning expires, and this ALREADY POTENTIALIZED and recompleted SEPARATE external circuit will expend half its stored potential energy to destroy its dipolarity, but it will also use the other half to power its loads and losses.

Then one simply reiterates the two-stage situation and potentializing operation. One POTENTIALIZES "STATICALLY" -- and dissipates non-statically after the primary "static source" is switched away and the diode-and-load inserted.

In this deliberately ASYMMETRIC two-stage operation, one only "pays" a tiny bit of energy input to operate the switching, which may be made very efficient. For "self-powering", the switching circuit is simply made a tiny "load" in the external circuit.

This system can readily be built by even any competent electrical engineering department if its doctorate engineers "think just a bit differently".

There are also a dozen known falsities -- pointed out by eminent scientists such as Nobelists -- still being taught in the sadly mutilated old electrical engineering model, in all our electrical engineering departments. Go to the use of a better (higher group symmetry) modern electrodynamics model (such as quaternion electrodynamics, very close to Maxwell's original theory), and the operation of such asymmetric systems now is included (as it was and is in Maxwell's original 20 quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns).

As an example, Nikola Tesla -- who gave us AC power, the rotating magnetic field that makes modern generators and motors possible, etc.) -- already had discovered ASYMMETRIC circuits in 1890, and was briefing scientific societies that one did not need to "burn fuel" to produce electrical energy! Instead, he pointed out that all the EM energy we need can be obtained directly from the "active medium" (he used that phrase because modern quantum physics and its concept of the active vacuum were not even born yet).

Well, was Tesla mad or did he actually have what he said?

Indeed, he had what he said! For rigorous proof, see the following paper by a great electrodynamicist and cofounder of ultrawideband radar (which itself was said to be "impossible" by the standard science community, even after working models were available. Of course, later UWB radar was proven and developed, and its founders were fully vindicated.) See T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41. Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla

We would have lost if it wasnt for those rogue six goals in the first quarter !!!

The world is full of Kings and Queens who blind your eyes and steal your dreams, Its HEAVEN AND HELL !!

Ronnie James Dio

Quote:
Yeah, start with the curling team

Did you see the USA/Russian women's match? It was a serious Babe Fest!

Why do you think I watch curling?

Quote:
One can also further surmise that, if tiny crystals of tourmaline (which are known to continually emit real photons whose energy is also extracted freely from the vacuum) are used as the "photon sources" to freely furnish the input photons to the Klimov microscopic solar cells, then "self-powering" of the Klimov nanocrystalline solar cell system is made possible, with all the system's input photon energy also freely taken from the vacuum via the crazy action of the tourmaline.

Why be concerned with providing a free source of photons (tourmaline) since the sun itself is a "free" source of limitless photons? Besides, wooden eye be more interested - from an audiophile point of view - in tourmaline's emitted negative ions than its emitted photons?

Furthermore, I see your Klimov nanocrystal solar cell and raise you two quantum dot solar cells.

Twinkle, twinkle, little star
How I wonder what you are.
Up above the world so high
Like a diamond in the sky.

Quote:
"As you are probably aware, recent rigorous physics work of Klimov et al. has now completely proven the capability of building physical devices (in his case, very small nanocrystalline solar cells) which directly extract and use excess usable energy from the virtual state. Klimov's work has been rigorously validated by two great independent laboratories: (1) Los Alamos National Laboratory and (2) National Recoverable Energy Laboratory. This rigorously proven work produces a coefficient of performance of performance from 200% to 700%, and this methodology and its proven results is now published in leading physics journals and nanocrystalline journals."

Hmm.. All I found was this:

http://www.lanl.gov/news/index.php/fuseaction/home.story/story_id/15709

Klimov states that carrier multiplication will allow for an efficiency increase from 31% to about 40%.

Where is this 200% to 700% increase coming from?

Cheers, John