Fried Model G/3 loudspeaker

Irving M. "Bud" Fried, an early contributor to Stereophile, hails from the city of brotherly love, and I must confess to finding it difficult avoiding a few brotherly jabs at Mr. Fried's name: something like "this Bud's for you" would surely not escape deletion by our conscientious Editor. And what if I should happen to complain of a dried-up or "Fried" quality in the upper mids—JA is bound to object to this breach of good taste. Well, having gotten that off my chest, you'd be interested to know that I consider it quite appropriate that someone from Phil-a-del-phia should be in love with transmission-line enclosures; the name is almost as convoluted as a trip down a folded line.

Transmission Lines
In the October 1965 issue of Wireless World, Dr. Arthur Bailey made quite a technical splash with an article entitled "A Nonresonant Loudspeaker Enclosure Design." The article was not concerned with panel resonances, but rather with suppressing the delayed output and cabinet resonances produced by the woofer's back wave. Dr. Bailey concluded that the back wave must be absorbed to avoid these problems, and that the only safe way of doing this was to transmit the rearward energy down an infinite transmission line (TL), absorbing it so totally that it never reaches the listening room. Not having the resources for a line of such magnitude, he instead approximated the line with a damped and folded port about eight feet in total length. The optimum damping material he discovered experimentally to be long-fiber wool, packed at a density of 0.5 to 1.0 pounds per cubic foot. The use of damping material is crucial to the success of the TL enclosure, and represents the major departure from the previously known acoustic labyrinth, which used very little damping. The sound velocity through the wool is about 20% lower than it is in free air, so the stuffed line effectively increases the actual length of the line.

The wool also damps the inevitable pipe resonances. Yes, Virginia, every pipeline has a series of standing-wave resonances, so that even the TL enclosure is not truly "nonresonant." The TL length is generally chosen to correspond to the quarter-wavelength of the woofer's free-air resonant frequency. The old acoustic labyrinth was normally tuned to the woofer's half-wavelength at resonance—but then woofers in the '40s and early '50s had resonant frequencies around 50 to 60Hz, where a half-wavelength is only about 10 feet.

The port output for either a quarter- or half-wave line is in phase with the forward radiation of the woofer, so there's reinforcement of the lower octaves. However, with a quarter-wave line there's the added benefit of having the standing wave out of phase with the back wave of the cone, providing a kind of "braking" action that reduces cone excursion at the woofer's resonant frequency. The TL enclosure generally succeeds in its objective of suppressing back-wave energy and, with the right woofer, is capable of providing very clean and extended bass response. Internal pressures are low: compared with a closed box, there's not as much flexing or bending of the cabinet panels. But the fly in the ointment is that the long lines needed are expensive and complicated to build.

Incidentally, there's another way of achieving back wave suppression. With the infinite baffle enclosure, there is no delayed output because the back wave never encounters the back panel. Of course, no one has yet succeeded in building a truly infinite baffle, but a good approximation is to mount the woofer in the floor when there's a basement below, or to use the wall of the house as a baffle, radiating the back wave to the great outdoors. Why, none other than our own LA was recently contemplating the idea of using an empty water well (yes, he has one in his old house) as a baffle for a 12" Dynaudio woofer.

The Fried G/3
Why spend so much time on transmission lines? Well, Bud Fried has been instrumental in popularizing this worthy enclosure for many years, and I think we all owe him a debt of gratitude for his perseverance. In the past, several large lines have been available in kit form from Fried. Curiously, though, very little of his recent production has utilized true TL bass loading, and the G/3—a floor-standing design of the same physical dimensions as the G/2A it replaces—is no exception. It is, in fact, a "lowly" bass-reflex design.

Refinements over the G/2A include mirror-imaging of the mid and treble drivers at the inward edge of each speaker, and provision inside the main cabinet of a separate, short, tri-folded line for the mid driver that vents in the rear. Mr. Fried actually refers to this line as "free flow transmission line loading," whatever that means, but to my eyes it simply appears to be a lightly damped folded pipe similar to the old fashioned acoustic labyrinth.

According to Mr. Fried, this line is a midrange panacea supposed to "produce a quieter, smoother, more dynamic, more time-accurate reproduction of the all important midrange." It seems to me that it is important to isolate the mid driver from the main cabinet, in order to eliminate crosstalk from the woofer, and Fried's line certainly does that. But I would have been happier if the line had been damped to minimize delayed output in the form of reflections through the midrange cone. In fact, I fail to see why a straight, highly damped line, or an isolation chamber, would not be a better approach.

Fried Products Corporation
PO Box 680
Gladwyne, PA 19035
(610) 649-8774