Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
works great, expensive though.
In last week's Vote, many readers reported that they had solved their speaker/room problems with a digital equalizer. What do you think about using digital EQ?
Think of "Newell's Law" as stated by Philip Newell in his splendid book "Studio Monitoring Design": Electronics problems must be solved by the electronics, room problems must be solved by the room. Therefore my aims in using a digital frequency EQ or time EQ would not be to simulate a better room, which appears to be nonsense, but to make up for some weaknesses of the loudspeakers, i.e. pair matching and general frequency response. It would be interesting to conduct a study about those possibilities.
I've used parametric and graphic equalizers in my system over the years. Although they generally worked as advertised, both units introduced so many undesireable artifacts into the music that I threw in the towel after just weeks of listening. I believe a much better approach is to try to adjust room acoustics with creative architectural design techniques. And, most importantly, gaining one's significant others help in doing so.