Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Vinyl is cheaper, and you can find classical performances you'll never find on CD, if you live in a big city. And, of course, it can sound so much better than CDs.
Last week's vote question about vinyl prompted a landslide of votes. Which impels us to ask, what is the ratio of CDs to LPs that you own?
My actual ratio is 90% Vinyl / 10% CD. While I do purchase some new CD's, I purchase many more new and used records over the course of a year. As I type this, I am planning how to fit a trip to a noted used record store into a short business trip I have coming up !
Compact Discs are a much more convenient medium -- surface noise is not as audible as quickly -- but I miss the headroom of the analog domain. We need a viable, non-watermarked high resolution digital solution (or solutions) and quickly! I think I just bought all the DAD's in existence.
I like many others converted to CD's even before the LP's mainstream demise. But except for a small percentage of extremely well recorded CD's, I was frequently disappointed with the audio. The SACD format finally fulfills the promise of palpable CD sound. I'm much more interested in quality audio than surround sound. I've heard a DTS audio (The Police) that sounded completely unrealistic. I'm not against surround if it's used properly to recreate the acoustic nuances one hears in a live performance. But I'll never buy into wow! type surround sound. I hope there are enough people like me who will keep the SACD format alive.
Every time I hear people talk about the convenience and sonic quality of CDs, I can't help but profess my feelings about all the subtle characteristics that are eliminated by the conversion of an omnipresent analog recording to a digital format.CDs are getting better,but what was once a trickle of information is now merely a slow running faucet when compared to the deluge of musical warmth that is analog. Thank you for the opportunity to express my opinion on this matter.