Revel f208 while you can still get them.

Kal, I am giving serious consideration to the M33, however I am wondering whether it will drive my Salon 2’s adequately. I know you reviewed it with the Studio 2’s. Thoughts?

It was just fine with the Studio2.

Hi Kal - What would be your preferred pair if you dropped down a level to the M10?

Still trying decide between the M10 (maybe with the BW 606s) and true separates like the Ragnarok 2.

Quote:

Still trying decide between the M10 (maybe with the BW 606s) and true separates like the Ragnarok 2.

I have no experience with any of those three products so I cannot comment.

I'm moving and need to replace my Audio Research/McCormack DNA-1 setup with an integrated amp and am looking at the NAD M33. I want to keep using my Thiel 3.6 speakers that I have had for 25 years and still love. Would they be a good match for the NAD? They are rated at 4 ohms (2.5 ohms minimum) and JA's measurements in the original Stereophile review showed they operated under 3 ohms through most of the frequency range, but never lower than 2.3 ohms.

Thanks!

Judging from JA's measurements, I am guessing yes.

Hi Kal,

So I have a M33 on the way and wondered about your recommendation for the Revel F208 ? Any other info to share as to why ?

Thanks, Wayne

??? Just my personal opinion that they are outstanding for the price and that, in that price range, they would be my starting point for any further considerations.

Kal Rubinson wrote:

??? Just my personal opinion that they are outstanding for the price and that, in that price range, they would be my starting point for any further considerations.

Thanks for your professional opinion . I have a pair, and an M33 drop shipped to me from Lenbrook