| Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Beautiful speaker, and I'm sure it sounds great. But for that price you can just about get into a nice used set of Olympica III and have a great floor standing speaker with significantly deeper bass.
Sonus Faber Olympica Nova 1 loudspeaker Associated Equipment
Sidebar 2: Associated Equipment
Analog sources: Linn Sondek LP12 turntable with Lingo power supply & Ittok tonearm, Spectral MC cartridge; Day-Sequerra 25-year Anniversary FM Reference FM tuner.
Digital sources: Bryston BCD-1 CD player, BDP-3 media player, BDA-3 DAC; Oppo Digital BDP-103 universal BD player; Roon Nucleus+ with Core V1.4 (build 300) stable (64 bit).
Preamplification: Bryston TP-2 30 step-up transformer; Bryston BP-173.
Power amplifiers: Mark Levinson No.534, ML2 monoblocks.
Loudspeakers: KEF LS50.
Cables: Digital: Bryston 75 ohm BNC to RCA; Wireworld Starlight (coaxial). Interconnect: Bryston, Pure Silver Cable (balanced, XLR); Red Rose Silver One, Totem Acoustic Sinew (single-ended, RCA). Speaker: Pure Silver Cable R50 (biwire double ribbon).
Accessories: JL Audio CR-1 electronic crossover; Apple iPhone 6 (iOS version 12); Studio Six's iTest Mic & AudioTools v.10.7.11; Torus Power RM 20 power conditioner; Salamander Designs Synergy System Audio Core Module Equipment Rack.
Listening room: 13' L × 11.5' W × 8' H with flat ceiling, sparsely furnished with IKEA area rug, overstuffed chair. Alcove (6' × 2.5' × 7') in rear wall filled with desk & books. Windows in front wall covered with closed blinds.—Larry Greenhill
NEXT: In My Room »
 | |||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
- Log in or register to post comments
COMMENTS
I heard the Nova 5 at some
Submitted by mtrot on February 28, 2020 - 12:14pm
I heard the Nova 5 at some length at RMAF in September, so I don't agree that my opinion is any more pretentious than yours or anyone else's.
As I do own both and you
Submitted by skypunk69 on February 28, 2020 - 3:42pm
As I do own both and you admitted to never hearing the Nova 1 it is pretentious as most of you so call AP types are.
Sour grapes eh.
Umm, okay if you say so, that
Submitted by mtrot on February 28, 2020 - 3:56pm
Umm, okay if you say so, that the Nova 1 sounds quite different from the Nova 5.
Baby Bathwater?
Submitted by skypunk69 on February 28, 2020 - 4:04pm
Yes for my larger/family room I have the 5 and for my office I have Nova 1 and prefer listening in my office with my Simaudo 390/330A, Rega P8.
So with you never hearing the I and making assumptions on a demo is not only pretentious it is comical at best.
Cheers.
So, are you saying the Nova 1
Submitted by mtrot on February 28, 2020 - 4:17pm
So, are you saying the Nova 1 has a significantly different sound from the Nova 5, or not? You don't seem to want to answer that question. If that is the case, then people need to know that.
People need to find out for themselves
Submitted by skypunk69 on February 28, 2020 - 5:48pm
Depending on reviews from sod's like your self that have never listened to either would be better served by a professional review as found on these page's.
Make it sound like you are working on a cure for cancer.
Yes jam those Nova 5 in a small office and they sound like shite!
But one must make the determination them self bu demoing on similar gear in a similar sized room as their listening room.
Opinions are like what?????????????
I prefer the Nova 1 in my office for listening to music (all genre's)
So long Trot!
Yeahhh
Submitted by supamark on February 29, 2020 - 1:56am
the guy practically bragging that he's got a ton of disposable income calling someone else pretentious.... are you the pot or the kettle?
Oh, and if the I sounds significantly different than the III (instead of similar but with better dynamics/bass), then Sonus Faber is not doing it right - and I'm pretty sure they're doing it right.
Green is not fetching on you.
Submitted by skypunk69 on February 29, 2020 - 8:14am
Pot calling the kettle Bernie.
You opening salvo said it all.
I am blessed with being able to work hard be rewarded and surround my self and my family with the trappings they enjoy.
So go ahead call be pretentious and you are consumed with envy.
Try working harder and getting the things you want in life not just what you need.
Please do take a reading comprehension course the point was an opinion had been formulated without ever hearing either speaker.
Bet after you take that course you will do better in life.
Cheer's
Class
Submitted by supamark on February 29, 2020 - 4:00pm
is something that you will never have... just like that orange, vienna sausage finger having simpleton in the White House who thinks gold plating everything makes it more classy lol. Oh, and since you weirdly went there; I actually come from a family with more money/connections than you'll ever have (and I work my butt off too, bub, and will be starting a new business soon - excited about that).
You make the mistake so many simple people make equating money with morality - most (but not all!) millionaires I know, and I know quite a few of them including my family and myself (old money ftw), are kinda douchey. People secure in themselves don't need to advertise what they have, only the insecure do that. I'm both happy and secure in my self, but you? Not so much, quite obviously.
Bernie is not my first (or second) choice for president, but go on making unfounded assumptions. I wouldn't be bothered by his election (any Democrat(ic socialist) will do), and I consider the Senate a bigger "get" for the Dems anyway because I actually understand how the US gov't is set up constitutionally.
Also, before you critique someone's writing/reading... make sure you can properly use the English language first.
* to the editor, sorry if I'm cranky - I've had the (actual) flu all week and have lost the patience required for suffering fools like this one.
Classless you are.
Submitted by skypunk69 on February 29, 2020 - 4:27pm
Oh poor child has the flu.
So sorry.......
Also your post is total gibberish and you do need those classes.
BTW Could care less about your political out look was referring to Weekend At Bernie's
Triggered!
So enjoy your feeble flu in your feeble life.
Later Cheeto Breath....
I do apologize.
Submitted by skypunk69 on March 1, 2020 - 8:05am
I did enjoy your rant though.
Good luck with your new business.
Yes. I don't understand why
Submitted by mtrot on February 29, 2020 - 2:53pm
Yes. I don't understand why this dude is calling ME pretentious because I would expect the Nova 1 to sound very similar to the Nova 5, which I heard at some length at RMAF. And I don't understand why he keeps saying that I've "never heard either", as I've stated repeatedly here that I heard the Nova 5. Weird.
As I do own both and you
Submitted by skypunk69 on February 28, 2020 - 3:42pm
As I do own both and you admitted to never hearing the Nova 1 it is pretentious as most of you so call AP types are.
Sour grapes eh.
" the Olympica Nova 1 excelled in the midrange and treble,
Submitted by Jack L on March 31, 2020 - 7:50am
.... and less so in the deep bass—unsurprisingly for a smallish loudspeaker." quoted Larry Greenhill.
I seldom go for whoever critics audio reviews as I only rely on my ears.
But this time, I full agree to what Greenhill's review on the bookselvers' lack of bass. This is physics.
NO, repeat, no so claimed "full range" loudspeakers, big or small, can reproduced deep bass music as already recorded realistically e.g. church/concert hall pipe organ floor shaking deep bass, or synthetic bass in pop music.
Only viable solution for consumers is to add active subwoofers to retrieve the deep bass music of the original recordings. NO other choice.
That is why I've added 3 active subwoofers to my stereo rig: L, R & L+R to retrieve the missed deep bass music years back.
I never look back as I am so gratified what I have done.
Listening to deep bass is believing
Jack L
Canada
"you make assumptions without even hearing them?"
Submitted by Jack L on March 31, 2020 - 12:07pm
Hi
Are you tellng us Greenhill's above commnent on small loudspeakers not reproducing adequate was a BS?
He is 100% correct. IMO, NO so claimed "full range" loudspeakers, big or small, can reproduce deep bass realistically, e.g. floor shaking deep bass of church/concert hall pipe organ music, & synthesized bass notes of rock music.
To achieve this deep bass effect, active subwoofers are indispensable. This is my years hands-on experience.
Listening to deep deep bass is believing
Jack L
Canada
Disturbing
Submitted by davip on March 1, 2020 - 11:05am
I always find the level of illiteracy among those who claim to be professionally successful, as in this individual's case, to be quite disturbing. Can one truly be considered a 'success' in life when unable to string a simple sentence together and possessed of the vocabulary of a 9-yr old? It's perfectly reasonable to suggest, as the first poster did, that a larger loudspeaker will, all else being equal, have greater bass extension than a smaller one. This is a matter of fact, not of opinion. Why then was he suggested to be 'pretentious' because he hadn't heard both loudspeakers? Do you even understand what this word means? Look up the meaning of this adjective and then compare it to your statements for an example of its true meaning. I've met a number of compulsive liars in the past, and your mouthy behaviour mirrors theirs to a tee. This is not the place for you...
I should have read thru the comments
Submitted by direstraitsfan98 on March 4, 2020 - 11:55pm
You expressed exactly my sentiments, good sir. I am left here scratching my head why this juvenile and bizarre conversation took place in the first place.
What exactly was the initial scuffle about?
Submitted by direstraitsfan98 on March 4, 2020 - 11:54pm
Apologies if I'm wrong, but was the initial disagreement based on this comment by mtrot
But for that price you can just about get into a nice used set of Olympica III and have a great floor standing speaker with significantly deeper bass
What exactly is wrong with this statement, and how is it an assumption? The Olympica III is a floor standing speaker, with a significantly larger volume cabinet, of course the bass is going to reach deeper.
suck out around crossover
Submitted by smileday on March 16, 2021 - 5:55am
A suck out around crossover may be related to incorrect sound around crossover: to slightly deemphasize more incorrectly produced frequencies.
I have seen measurement of some speakers with different crossover point (not the frequency where ears are most sensitive). There was a suck out, too.
| Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | |
Analog Sources Accessories Featured | |
Music Columns Retired Columns | |
Show Reports | |
Features Latest News Community | |
Resources Subscriptions |
© 2024 StereophileAVTech Media Americas Inc., USA
All rights reserved
