Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
It's the future! Don't become obsolete!
As evidenced by the response to last week's vote, audiophiles are increasingly turning to their computers as a source of music. Should <I>Stereophile</I> review more or fewer computer audio products?
You can't ignore the future, can you? Don't know how it is in the USA, but here in Germany there are even some dedicated magazines for computer audio. Network-solutions (LAN/WLAN technologies), storage and playback devices, software for file-tagging, decoding/encoding and playback of music-data, etc. Everything regarding computer audio is among the interests of these mags. I could even imagine a separate, dedicated sister to Stereophile for computer audio. Like Home Theater. While discovering new frontiers and increasing circulation, you could then keep Stereophile the way it is and avoid annoying its conservative readers. A separate mag for computer audio, done in the Stereophile-way would simply be great! Set your course towards the future!
A bit more would be welcome. Judging by some of the responses on last week's vote, there are plenty of readers who already use their computers as part of their system. I'm not saying you should feel obliged to include computer audio all the time. Just aim to review products that either offer a whole new experience of the technology (like Sooloos, for instance) or those that are designed with an eye to audio quality as the #1 priority.
I'd like to see three or four issues per year dedicated to "computer audio" for two reasons: explaining and discussing the options for playing high-resolution audio files and explaining and discussing distributed music systems (ie, ripping, storage, wireless transmission, D/A, etc). Potentially the best of both worlds: better sound and better access. I think JA has been way out in front on these topics.
As I work in IT, the last thing I want to do is spend my leisure time doing the same stuff I do for a living. But I do recognize that some people feel the exact opposite, and prefer to leverage their expertise towards audio. So my preference is for integrated solutions such as those from Sooloos, Olive, Linn, etc, that minimize geeky activity. The wild card is hi-rez audio, which has to be stored on a hard drive. And I am also looking forward to the day when I can play any 44.1/16 or higher content just by accessing it with an iPod Touch or similar device.
I am a subscriber. Don't keep it so basic with computer audio. Please review the more high-end computer audio: Lynx or RME sound cards, Jriver, computer-based DSP, solid-state hard drives, etc. Most of your readers probably don't yet know that they can produce better audio with the right computer than any CD player available, other than SACD.