Digital Processor Reviews

Schiit Audio Yggdrasil D/A processor The Analog 2 upgrade

Herb Reichert, September 2018 (Vol.41 No.9):

My first CD player was a portable: a Sony Walkman. My second CD player was a sturdy black TEAC VRDS 7, which I quickly relegated to transport-only duties serving one or another DACs from Audio Note. From the start, I enjoyed playing CDs. But compared to LPs, digital sounded deficient in contrast and conspicuously artificial, in a plastic-bottles-in-the-ocean kind of way. It felt distant and mechanical. Nonetheless, my brain readily adapted to its shortcomings.

After the TEAC, I switched to a C.E.C. TL2 belt-drive CD transport, which I thought made digital sound less digital. When I began writing for Stereophile, my transport was my computer, connected to an easy-flowing Halide DAC HD. During its tenure, the Halide drove a variety of integrated amplifiers, which in turn powered my wall-mounted Rogers LS3/5a loudspeakers. Then . . .

My friend Sphere loaned me his Schiit Audio Asgard headphone amplifier and Bifrost DAC (with Multibit upgrade), and a pair of AKG K812 headphones—whereupon I got hooked on audiophile-grade headphones and the Edgar Allen Poe-tential of a company named Schiit. Schiit's Bifrost Multibit DAC ($399) had an intoxicating, natural-feeling vitality and a special kind of infectious bounce, the likes of which I'd never before experienced from digital.

When Schiit introduced their much-anticipated Yggdrasil DAC ($2399), my wait for a review sample was long—Yggys were selling like free ice cream, and Schiit's principals, Mike Moffat and Jason Stoddard, didn't have one to spare. While I waited, I reviewed Schiit's Ragnarok integrated amplifier, and listened to Yggys at every headphone show. Both Schiits seemed to sound vigorously dynamic yet calm and relaxed. At last, my own Yggdrasil arrived. Within a few days, it had become my first true reference DAC.

Analog 2 upgrade
Recently, I noticed that streamed and computer-sourced files via USB sound less flat and more engaging, like somebody turned up the Contrast knob, than I get from CDs via S/PDIF. The difference in sound between these two sources/inputs was more obvious after Schiit had installed in my Yggdrasil their Analog 2 upgrade ($550), which, per their website, will "Bring your older Yggdrasil up to full Yggdrasil Analog 2 specification." The upgrade includes two new output cards, and a firmware update for the DSP board. From Schiit's webpage for this upgrade: "Due to the need for firmware and hardware updates, this upgrade must be done by Schiit, or by an authorized service center. . . . Because of this, there is no self-install option, sorry. . . . Yggdrasil Analog 2 upgrades are covered by a 2-year warranty or the balance of the original [five-year] factory warranty, whichever is greater. For factory-installed upgrades on out-of-warranty products, this re-activates the warranty on the complete product for 2 years."

My Yggdrasil was antediluvian. While it was in the shop, Schiit brought it up to 2018 specs by also installing the Gen 5 USB digital input upgrade ($150), which, per their website, features: "1. Electromagnetic and electrostatic isolation using transformer coupling. 2. Self-power by the DAC for the critical low-noise re-clocking and latching sections. 3. Precision local clocks for both 44.1 and 48k multiples." New Yggdrasils cost $2399, $100 more than old Yggdrasils, and include both upgrades.

Listening
I meant what I suggested in the conclusion of my review of BorderPatrol's DAC SE, elsewhere in this issue: to my ears and taste, the fully upgraded Yggdrasil Analog 2 sounds more natural, neutral, accurate, and transparent, more filled with light, and less exaggeratedly male or female, yin or yang, left or right brain, than the Border Patrol or Benchmark DAC3 HGC DACs. The more I listened to the Analog 2 upgrade, the more just right it sounded.

My original Yggdrasil made music in a fun, highly articulate way, but its empty spaces were filled with a fine, vibrating, subliminal grain. That vibrating haze might have originated in my CD transport, my computer, or my brain—but with the Analog 2 upgrade, it was now completely gone. Was the cause the Gen 5 USB upgrade? No matter. Through the Yggdrasil Analog 2, backgrounds were now more transparent and "black" than before. Which, to my delight, allowed new sonic delicacies to emerge.

As I type this, I'm listening to Vladimir Horowitz play Domenico Scarlatti's Sonata in E, K.380, from Horowitz in Moscow (16-bit/44.1kHz, Deutsche Grammophon/Tidal HiFi), and I'm mesmerized by the tiniest subtleties of the master's touch. My mind follows and sees the butterfly-like tactility of every keystroke. Following Horowitz's fingers was a rare delight: No other DAC—not the BorderPatrol, not the Benchmark DAC3 HGC, not even the HoloAudio "Kitsuné Tuned Edition" Level 3—has been able to direct my attention to this aspect of Horowitz's marvelous playing.

The Analog 2 upgrade retained all of the original Yggdrasil's virtues, especially its force and drive, but with a new spiderweb delicacy, more lower-octave density, and, most important, a more complete transparency.

I use ethnomusicologist Alan Lomax's Southern Journey anthologies as tools to estimate how effectively a DAC can dig into a recording's bitstream. Lomax made these 1959 field recordings with a stereo microphone and an Ampex open-reel tape recorder. The remasterings released by Rounder Records are renowned for their vividness and spatial acuity. The Yggdrasil Analog 2 let me count the singers in the Belleville A Capella Choir singing "John the Revelator," from Southern Journey, Volume 8: Velvet Voices—Eastern Shores Choirs, Quartets, and Colonial Era Music (CD, Rounder Select 1708). The Analog 2 let me do this counting with more certainty than any DAC of my experience except the HoloAudio Spring, which images with equal precision but places its images on a darker soundstage. I could "see" the singers better through the Yggdrasil Analog 2 because its aural lens was more sharply focused, wider angled, and let through more "light" than the Spring's.

I spent nearly a week listening to the 13 volumes of Southern Journey while alternating between the HoloAudio Spring and the Yggdrasil Analog 2. Each artist's high sentiment and rural American spirituality were communicated extremely well through both DACs. So were the tones of their acoustic guitars, banjos, pianos, and voices. Best of all . . .

Summing Up
The Schiit DAC combined its signature insightfulness with a most perfect sort of transparency—not a presentation that sounded hollow or switched off, like a mute switch, but one that was alive and scintillating with energy, yet perfectly hear-through and see-through. For me, transparency implies a feeling of being there—right in front of the microphones. The Schiit enabled that extremely well.

Schiit Audio's Yggdrasil Analog 2 made music that did not feel reformed or reconstituted. Compared to the original Yggdrasil, the Analog 2's sound was quieter, more refined, more transparent, more silky, more tactile. If you liked the Yggdrasil, you'll love the Analog 2. I promise.—Herb Reichert

COMPANY INFO
Schiit Audio
24900 Anza Drive, Unit A
Valencia, CA 91355
(323) 230-0079
schitt.com
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
mink70's picture
Submitted by mink70 on January 18, 2017 - 8:12pm

This is straight-up poetry:

"Live music may be viewed as a continuously pulsating wavefront. If you hold your hand up, you can almost feel it. Recorded music is a coded narrative simulacrum of that pulsing wavefront. If anything in the recording or playback chain interrupts, bends, truncates, or haphazardly disrupts the original (live) continuity—all the world's smart guys can never restore its hyperfragile relationships of time, frequency, and amplitude. Love, music, and poetry live only in the undamaged continuity of those relationships. (Unlike the stock market or election polling, music is not a stochastic process.)"

allhifi's picture
Submitted by allhifi on January 12, 2019 - 12:49pm

Woah:

" ...coded narrative simulacrum .."
" ...pulsing wavefront."
" ..haphazardly disrupts..."
" ....hyperfragile .."

" ..undamaged continuity of those relationships."

It's straight-up alright, and perhaps even poetically-challenged !

pj

allhifi's picture
Submitted by allhifi on January 19, 2017 - 1:05am

Hi Kal: This review was indeed informative --two DAC's of opposite ends of the sonic spectrum was my take.
However, from one disc, music file or song to the next, which of the two will resolve each one distinctively --revealing the huge distinctions in recording quality/tonality known to exist within the music itself ?

That, to me, would make my decision (to purchase) much easier.

pj

tonykaz's picture
Submitted by tonykaz on January 19, 2017 - 7:08am

I've been in Audio since the 1950s, my numerous Schiit pieces of headphone gear are the amongst the best performing Audio Electronics I've ever encountered annnnnnd they're cheap by comparison but not cheaply made or appearing.

Now Schiit is immigrating to the Audiophile world with a range of Preamps and Amps. This will be a breath of fresh air for all of us gripers about the Stratospheric Cost of High-End Audio stuff ( $100,000 Mono Amps, for gods sake ).

Designing is an Art Form, Mr. Stoddard is an Artist. I think he designs the entire product, a global type of designer, he does A Level work.

So, Audiophile World, Brace yourself, your about to get traditional Audio Research levels of performance at NAD 3020 price points! PHEW!

Well Done Schiit, just what we've been waiting for.

Tony in Michigan

ps. I'm a Schiit owner, not affiliated in any way with the Schiit Company, other than being a bit of a Critic

rt66indierock's picture
Submitted by rt66indierock on January 20, 2017 - 6:02pm

Forgot the DAC you reviewed. Harmonics wipe a big chunk of high end audio. A banjo gets most of the rest as Art Dudley reported his Capital Audiofest coverage last year. And finally fiddle sawing in Cajun music gets almost everything leftover. It is now pretty easy to choose from what little is left.

You must tell me sometime how you got the last paragraph of the review past the editors. Whatever you did keep doing it.

USAudio's picture
Submitted by USAudio on January 27, 2017 - 1:38pm

Mike Moffat, the digital designer at Schiit and an innovator in the field, has been doing this a long time. Perhaps JA could reach out to the guys at Schiit for details on why they made the design decisions they did, in particular the use of the 20-bit D/A converters and DSP?

USAudio's picture
Submitted by USAudio on January 30, 2017 - 9:28pm

Also, I don't see anywhere in the Yggdrasil measurements a mention of its measured resolution like we usually do with digital processors?
Per Schiit's website: "Yggdrasil is the world’s only closed-form multibit DAC, delivering 21 bits of resolution with no guessing anywhere in the digital or analog path." - http://schiit.com/products/yggdrasil
Did JA indeed find the Yggdrasil's resolution to be 21 bits?
Thanks!

John Atkinson's picture
Submitted by John Atkinson on January 31, 2017 - 7:44am
USAudio wrote:
I don't see anywhere in the Yggdrasil measurements a mention of its measured resolution like we usually do with digital processors?

I didn't offer that judgment because the Yggdrqasil is not like conventional D/A processors that use 24-bit DC chips. With the latter, the resolution will be limited by the thermal noise of the overall DAC+analog circuitry, which produces a random noisefloor. With the Schiit, however, while the analog noise is very low, as I mentioned in the review, the noisefloor will rise with 24-bit audio due to what appears to be the truncation of the LSBs. As the noisefloor will therefore be related to the encoded signal, my usual estimate of the DAC resolution will be misleading.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

USAudio's picture
Submitted by USAudio on January 31, 2017 - 9:50am

Thanks for the clarification John!

rom661's picture
Submitted by rom661 on January 27, 2017 - 6:09pm

Prior experience with an earlier product line of his makes me apprehensive.

USAudio's picture
Submitted by USAudio on January 28, 2017 - 12:32pm

I think you'll find with a little web searching and on head-fi.org that Schiit customer support is very well regarded. Anecdotally, and this isn't probably typical, but I once sent a question to Schiit technical support on a Sunday afternoon and got a response within the hour! Mike Moffat's partner, Jason Stoddard, is heavily involved in communicating with the audio community, particularly through head-fi.org.

rom661's picture
Submitted by rom661 on January 28, 2017 - 1:41pm

As I said, this was a different company. Hope your experience is good.

USAudio's picture
Submitted by USAudio on January 28, 2017 - 2:27pm

"As I said, this was a different company."
Exactly.

"Not Schitt"
It's spelled "Schiit", but I guess that is based on your perspective! ;-)

allhifi's picture
Submitted by allhifi on January 12, 2019 - 2:44pm

RE: " "Not Schitt" It's spelled "Schiit", but I guess that is based on your perspective!"

Seriously? Who gives a shit.

pj

SteveG's picture
Submitted by SteveG on January 29, 2017 - 5:37pm

As JA knows, the Schiit employs a 20 or 21-bit DAC. While the DAC may be able to accept a 24-bit signal, it cannot know what to do with the LSB of a 24-bit signal. Thus, his tests reveal neither that the hardware is defective nor that there is something amiss in the software.

John Atkinson's picture
Submitted by John Atkinson on January 30, 2017 - 4:14am
SteveG wrote:
As JA knows, the Schiit employs a 20 or 21-bit DAC. While the DAC may be able to accept a 24-bit signal, it cannot know what to do with the LSB of a 24-bit signal.

My comments were not odd. When you have 24-bit data but 20-bit DACs, you need to dither those data to match the DAC. Otherwise, simply chopping off the 4 LSBs, called "truncation," reintroduces quantizing distortion. Schiit's Jason Stoddard has subsequently said that the Yggdrasil "rounds" 24-bit data but my measurements suggest that the LSBs of 24-bit data are simply truncated.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

gevorg's picture
Submitted by gevorg on January 30, 2017 - 10:23am

>>When you have 24-bit data but 20-bit DACs...

Aren't most, if not all, DACs cannot truly resolve beyond 20-21 bits anyway, including those on Stereophile Class A list? So what difference would "rounding" or "truncation" make with the last ~4 bits of thermal noise/etc? Why should this matter for the audiophile, mastering engineer, critical listener, etc?

John Atkinson's picture
Submitted by John Atkinson on January 30, 2017 - 12:01pm
gevorg wrote:
Aren't most, if not all, DACs cannot truly resolve beyond 20-21 bits anyway, including those on Stereophile Class A list? So what difference would "rounding" or "truncation" make with the last ~4 bits of thermal noise/etc?

As I said but you appeared to ignore, truncation of the LSBs in 24-bit data reintroduces quantization noise/distortion. Research by people like Bob Katz has shown that this will be audible even with real-world DACs.

gevorg wrote:
Why should this matter for the audiophile, mastering engineer, critical listener, etc?

Now you could say that you prefer the sound of truncation against that of redithering and I have no argument with that opinion. But if it costs the engineer nothing other than a little bit more silicon real estate to do it right, why not? The end result is reduced–bit-depth data presented to the DAC that will never have audible consequences whereas simply truncating the data will produce artifacts that will be audible, perhaps not with every recording but definitely with some.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

scottbuzby's picture
Submitted by scottbuzby on November 4, 2018 - 1:38am

JA,

Schiit Audio has made significant changes to Yggdrasil. Please re-measure a current production unit. I think you will find it measures much better than the original release.

Thanks,
Scott

bapcha's picture
Submitted by bapcha on June 30, 2019 - 10:55pm

Truncation and rounding create identical amount of rms noise. This is very basic. Claiming that rounding is better than truncation is incorrect - especially since you referred to qualtizing distortion (same thing as noise). Yes, you can check me on that. I studied under Dr. Henry Samueli, UCLA, Broadcom (one of the best known DSP guys on earth)

LarryMagoo's picture
Submitted by LarryMagoo on March 29, 2017 - 3:45pm

John,

It's a shame you cannot judge the Yggy with your ears as well. Because if you did, it would not have ended up in the Class B....its really that simple!

All any of has to "sell" is credibility. You just lost yours!

Larry

allhifi's picture
Submitted by allhifi on April 20, 2017 - 6:32am

Wonderful comparison; Mytek "Brooklyn" and "Yggdrasil":

A wonderful contrast of two DAC's. A modern take on A Tale of Two ...." !

It's clear the "Brooklyn" incorportaes the latest understanding and technology of modern DAC design. I suppose the "Yggy" appeals to those who cannot break the bond of analog desires.

The superiority of Brooklyn's resolution shupld be commended --as is their MQA adoption. I envision a superior linear P/S on the Mytek wold elevate into the super-DAC territory (or perhaps the Manhatten 2) ?

But back to the $2K price-point, if Schitt can offer a decent linear P/S, how is it that Mytek cannot do the same for the "Brookyln" ?

Hmmm, my vote would be the Brooklyn". Let's move forward ...

pj

hollowman's picture
Submitted by hollowman on December 29, 2018 - 12:36am

I was just looking thru two early-90s Stereophile issues (Dec. 1992; Mar. 1993) ... not a single analog/phono review or article (tho' I did see an Acoustic Sounds ad with LPs and equip.). Some tube gear. And MANY multibit DACs or CDPs -- reviews, articles, ads, classifieds.
I have a late-1980s aftermarket-modified Philips CDP, with the classic TDA1541A and SAA7220 (4x DF). And it's better sounding than all more-modern DACs in my collection (that feature delta-sigma).
Indeed, those early-90s Stereophiles were full of glowing reviews of Arcams and MSBs and Naims ... all using that classic Philips platform.

My suggestion for JA and other Stereophile reviewers is to go into their attic or basement storage ... and dig out these gems. And use THEM as a basis of comparisons against Chord, Border Patrol, Benchmark, etc.

Oh ... JA ... please webify that 1995 Fabio article. He had VERY high-end $$$ system based on a Krell CDP. No phono, no tubes.

allhifi's picture
Submitted by allhifi on January 12, 2019 - 7:53am

Herb's: Hmmm. Very odd, you start the review by saying:

" .. From the start, I enjoyed playing CDs. But compared to LPs, digital sounded deficient in contrast and conspicuously artificial, in a plastic-bottles-in-the-ocean kind of way. It felt distant and mechanical." (Sure did)

"Nonetheless, my brain readily adapted to its shortcomings."

Is that a joke? Of course not, so it's therefore most telling; Your 'brain' adapted to its short-comings ? WTF. Those "shortcomings" (back in the 1980's) were so severe/nasty that no normal "brain" could adapt to is shortcomings.

Yet, your comments become even more ridiculous, when you say (35-years later):

" My original Yggdrasil made music in a fun, highly articulate way, but its empty spaces were filled with a fine, vibrating, subliminal grain. That vibrating haze might have originated in my CD transport, my computer, or my brain—but with the Analog 2 upgrade, it was now completely gone. Was the cause the Gen 5 USB upgrade? No matter. Through the Yggdrasil Analog 2, backgrounds were now more transparent and "black" than before. Which, to my delight, allowed new sonic delicacies to emerge."

OMG, LOL; In other words, 35-years prior to Schiit's DAC/Yggy, you were happier than a swine in dung (your "brain" adapted to 1982's horrific CD sound), and then, near 40-years later you're taken/impressed by the second Generation of a $2K DAC because you can now:

" to my delight, allowed new sonic delicacies to emerge."

AND (the best part), you now have the "sensitivities" to identify and enjoy :

A)".Analog 2, backgrounds were now more transparent and "black" than before."

B) " ...Which, to my delight, allowed new sonic delicacies to emerge."

C) " ... I'm mesmerized by the tiniest subtleties of the master's touch. My mind follows and sees the butterfly-like tactility of every keystroke."

D) "The Analog 2 upgrade retained all of the original Yggdrasil's virtues, especially its force and drive, but with a new spiderweb delicacy, more lower-octave density, and, most important, a more complete transparency.

I'm near ready to throw-up:

" ..spider-web delicacy ...low octave density ...complete transparency"

Yet, back in 1982, again, using your words:

" ..FROM THE START, I enjoyed playing CDs ..."

An oxymoron if there ever was one; if one loves/understands/feels music, there is not a lobotomy in hell that could have fixed our brains to make sense of that atrocity of a (SQ) technology called the Compact Disc, back in 1982.

In fact, Herby, that was pretty much the status quo "sound" for the next 20 (CD) years as well -SHIT.

But, here you are, extolling the (rightfully) intricate details, subtleties (virtues) of digital replay NEARLY 40-YEARS after you admittedly enjoyed back in 82' !

A fake, and fraud.

peter jasz

X