Rotel Michi P5 preamplifier Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

I tested the Rotel Michi P5 with my Audio Precision SYS2722 system (see the January 2008 "As We See It"). Looking first at its behavior via its line inputs, I performed most of the testing with the balanced inputs and balanced outputs and with the volume control set to its maximum. I repeated some of the tests with the unbalanced inputs and outputs with the volume control first set to its maximum, then at 77, which is equivalent to –10dB. (The volume control operates in accurate 0.5dB steps.)

The maximum gain for the balanced input to the balanced output was 18.55dB and for the unbalanced input to the unbalanced output, it was a little lower, at 16dB. For unbalanced inputs, the maximum gain at the balanced output was 23.9dB. The maximum gain at the headphone output was a high 33.5dB. The preamplifier preserved absolute polarity (ie, was noninverting) at the headphone jack and with balanced and unbalanced inputs and outputs. The XLR jacks are wired with pin 2 hot, the AES convention.

The P5's unbalanced input impedance is specified at 47k ohms; I measured 85k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, dropping to a still-high 52k ohms at 20kHz. The balanced input impedance, specified as 100k ohms, was 42k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, 39k ohms at 20kHz. The balanced output impedance was a low 215 ohms at high and middle frequencies but rose to 1195 ohms at the bottom of the audioband. The unbalanced output impedance was the specified 470 ohms across the audioband. The headphone jack's output impedance was a fairly high 150 ohms from 20Hz to 20kHz. Low-impedance headphones will not be driven optimally by the P5.

The preamplifier's frequency response in both balanced and unbalanced modes was flat from 10Hz to almost 200kHz into the high 100k ohm load (fig.1, blue and red traces), with superb channel matching. Into a more demanding 600 ohm load (fig.1, cyan, magenta), the balanced response rolled off in the bass due to the rise in this output's source impedance with decreasing frequency. The Michi P5 will not be a good match for those few power amplifiers that have an input impedance below 1000 ohms. This will not be an issue with Michi's own amplifiers, including the matching S5, which has a specified input impedance of 12.5k ohms (unbalanced) and 100k ohms (balanced).

1020Rotelfig01

Fig.1 Rotel Michi P5, balanced in–balanced out, volume control set to maximum, frequency response at 1V into: 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red) 600 ohms (left cyan, right magenta) (1dB/vertical div.).

Fig.1 was taken with the Michi's volume control at its maximum setting; both the response and the superb channel matching were identical at lower settings of the control. The headphone output offered a more restricted ultrasonic response, rolling off by 0.3dB at the top of the audioband (fig.2).

1020Rotelfig02

Fig.2 Rotel Michi P5, headphone output, volume control set to maximum, frequency response at 1V into 600 ohms (left channel blue, right red, 1dB/vertical div.).

Fig.3 shows the effects of the treble and bass controls, set to their maximum and minimum positions. The low-frequency boost or cut reaches 14dB, those at high frequencies reach ±12dB. These are on the extreme side—the P5's manual notes that "A properly setup Hi-Fi system should not require changes to the Bass or Treble setting. Use these adjustments sparingly." Channel separation via the line inputs (not shown) was excellent, at >100dB in both directions below 3kHz and still 80dB at 20kHz.

1020Rotelfig03

Fig.3 Rotel Michi P5, frequency response at 1V into 100k ohms with treble and bass controls set to their maximum and minimum and switched out of circuit (left channel blue, right red, 5dB/vertical div.).

The Michi preamp offered extremely low noise. From unbalanced inputs to unbalanced output, the wideband, unweighted signal/noise ratio, measured with the input shorted to ground but the volume control set to its maximum, was a high 82.25dB ref. 1V output, average of both channels. Restricting the measurement bandwidth to the audioband increased the S/N ratio to an excellent 94.1dB, while switching an A-weighting filter into circuit further improved this ratio, to 98.2dB. Power-supply–related spuriae in the P5's output were very low, with those at 120Hz, 240Hz, and 360Hz highest in level between –90dB and –100dB (fig.4).

1020Rotelfig04

Fig.4 Rotel Michi P5, volume control set to maximum, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 1V into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

Fig.5 plots the percentage of THD+noise in the P5's balanced output into 100k ohms. The THD+N is very low below 20V. (It rises below this voltage, due to the fixed level of noise becoming an increasing percentage of the signal level as the latter drops.) The balanced output clips (ie, when the THD+N reaches 1%) at a very high 23V, while reducing the load to a punishing 600 ohms reduced the maximum balanced output level to 15V (not shown). The unbalanced output clipped at a very high 18.5V into 100k ohms. All these voltages are much higher than will be needed to drive a power amplifier to its maximum power.

1020Rotelfig05

Fig.5 Rotel Michi P5, balanced output, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output voltage into 100k ohms.

To be sure that the reading was not dominated by noise, I measured how the Rotel's distortion changed with frequency at 10V output. Nevertheless, the THD+N percentage was very low throughout the audioband both into 100k ohms (0.0015%, fig.6, blue and red traces) and even lower in the midrange into 600 ohms (cyan, magenta traces).

1020Rotelfig06

Fig.6 Rotel Michi P5, balanced output, THD+N (%) vs frequency at 10V into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red) and 600 ohms (left cyan, magenta).

I examined the spectrum of the distortion at the same high balanced output level, but the only harmonic visible was the third, at –120dB (0.0001%) (fig.7). Even when I reduced the load impedance to 600 ohms, the third harmonic only rose to –100dB (0.001%, fig.8). Tested for intermodulation distortion in balanced mode with an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones at peak level of 10V into 100k ohms, any distortion products were vanishingly low in level (fig.9).

1020Rotelfig07

Fig.7 Rotel Michi P5, balanced output, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 10V into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

1020Rotelfig08

Fig.8 Rotel Michi P5, balanced output, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 10V into 600 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

1020Rotelfig09

Fig.9 Rotel Michi P5, balanced output, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at 10V peak into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

Turning to the phono input, in moving-magnet mode the maximum gain was 52.2dB at the unbalanced outputs and 6dB higher at the balanced output. In moving-coil mode, these maximum gains were 21dB higher. The phono input preserved absolute polarity at all outputs in both MM and MC modes. With the phono stage set to MM, the input impedance was an appropriately high 44k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, dropping to 33k ohms at 20kHz. The MC mode's input impedance was 101 ohms across the audioband. The P5's RIAA correction offered very low error and was well-matched between the channels (fig.10).

1020Rotelfig10

Fig.10 Rotel Michi P5, phono input, MM mode, response with RIAA correction (left channel blue, right red, 0.5dB/vertical div.)

Channel separation via the phono input was an excellent 90dB in both directions in the low treble. The phono input's noise performance in MM mode was very good, with unweighted audioband signal/noise ratios (ref. 1kHz at 5mV input signal) of 68.5dB (average of both channels). The ratios improved by 10dB when A-weighted. Set to MC mode, the ratios were all 20dB lower than in MM mode.

The P5's phono input offered good overload margins, at around 29dB ref. 1kHz at 5mV across the band in MM mode and 28dB ref. 1kHz at 500µV in MC mode. Distortion was very low. It primarily consisted of the second harmonic, but this lay at just –100dB (0.001%), even at a level 17.5dB higher than the nominal MM cartridge level of 5mV at 1kHz (fig.11). Intermodulation distortion via the Rotel's phono input was similarly very low (fig.12).

1020Rotelfig11

Fig.11 Rotel Michi P5, phono input, MM mode, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–10kHz, at 37mV input (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

1020Rotelfig12

Fig.12 Rotel Michi P5, phono input, MM mode, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz,, at 370mV input (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

The P5's coaxial and optical S/PDIF inputs locked to datastreams with sample rates up to 192kHz. Apple's USB Prober utility identified the processor as "MICHI USB Audio 2.0" from "MICHI" and confirmed that the USB port operated in the optimal isochronous asynchronous mode. Apple's AudioMIDI utility revealed that, via USB, the Rotel preamplifier accepted 16- and 24-bit integer data sampled at all rates from 44.1 to 768kHz. The P5's maximum output level at the unbalanced outputs was 15.88V with a 1kHz tone at 0dBFS, which suggests that the gain architecture of the preamplifier's digital inputs is well-arranged. All the P5's outputs preserved absolute polarity with digital input signals.

The P5's reconstruction filter had a minimum-phase impulse response with 44.1kHz data (fig.13), with all the ringing following the single high sample at 0dBFS. With 44.1kHz-sampled white noise, the Michi's response featured a fast rolloff above the audioband, reaching full stop-band attenuation at 24kHz (fig.14, red and magenta traces). The aliased image at 25kHz of a full-scale 19.1kHz tone (fig.14, blue and cyan traces) was suppressed by 100dB. Given the superbly low distortion via the P5's analog line inputs, I was surprised to see distortion harmonics in this graph, with the second the highest in level, at –77dB (0.014%).

1020Rotelfig13

Fig.13 Rotel Michi P5, digital inputs, impulse response (one sample at 0dBFS, 44.1kHz sampling, 4ms time window).

1020Rotelfig14

Fig.14 Rotel Michi P5, digital inputs, wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS (left channel red, right magenta) and 19.1kHz tone at 0dBFS (left blue, right cyan) into 100k ohms with data sampled at 44.1kHz (20dB/vertical div.).

With data sampled at 44.1kHz, the P5's frequency response rolled off gently in the top audio octave (fig.15, green and gray traces), reaching –0.25dB at 20kHz before the inevitable sharp rolloff above that frequency. At higher sample rates (fig.15, cyan, magenta, blue, and red traces), the responses followed the same gentle ultrasonic rolloffs.

1020Rotelfig15

Fig.15 Rotel Michi P5, digital inputs, frequency response at –12dBFS into 100k ohms with data sampled at: 44.1kHz (left channel green, right gray), 96kHz (left cyan, right magenta), and 192kHz (left blue, right red) (0.5dB/vertical div.).

When I increased the bit depth from 16 to 24 with a dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS (fig.16), the random noise floor dropped by 22dB, meaning that the P5 offers 19 bits' worth of resolution. With undithered 16-bit data representing a tone at exactly –90.31dBFS, the three DC voltage levels described by the data were well-resolved (fig.17), with the minimum-phase ringing at the waveform transitions visible. The 24-bit waveform was a fairly clean sinewave (fig.18).

1020Rotelfig16

Fig.16 Rotel Michi P5, digital inputs, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS with: 16-bit data (left channel cyan, right magenta), 24-bit data (left blue, right red) (20dB/vertical div.).

1020Rotelfig17

Fig.17 Rotel Michi P5, digital inputs, waveform of undithered 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS, 16-bit data (left channel blue, right red).

1020Rotelfig18

Fig.18 Rotel Michi P5, digital inputs, waveform of undithered 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS, 24-bit data (left channel blue, right red).

As I noted above, the Michi P5's digital inputs offered higher levels of harmonic distortion than I expected. With a full-scale 50Hz tone into 100k ohms, the second harmonic was the highest in level (fig.19). This harmonic was higher in the right channel (red trace) than in the left channel (blue), at –79dB (0.011%) and –97dB (0.0014%), respectively. This behavior was not affected by the volume control setting. Though intermodulation products were present with equal-level tones at 19 and 20kHz with the combined waveform peaking at 0dBFS (fig.20), these were all low in level. However, the distortion products were again higher in the right channel than the left.

1020Rotelfig19

Fig.19 Rotel Michi P5, digital inputs, 24-bit data, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 0dBFS into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

1020Rotelfig20

Fig.20 Rotel Michi P5, USB input, 24-bit data, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at 0dBFS into 100k ohms, 44.1kHz data (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

Tested for their rejection of word-clock jitter with 16-bit J-Test data, the Michi's optical and coaxial S/PDIF inputs didn't fare well (fig.21). The odd-order harmonics of the LSB-level, low-frequency squarewave either side of the spectral spike that represents the high-level tone at one-quarter the sample rate (Fs/4) were not at the correct levels, which are indicated by the sloping green line in fig.21. More significantly, a large number of power supply–related sidebands are present that were not present with USB data (fig.22). (Pairs of sidebands are present with USB data at ±60Hz and ±120Hz, and the spectral spike at Fs/4 has significant broadening of its base, due to the presence of low-frequency random jitter.)

1020Rotelfig21

Fig.21 Rotel Michi P5, TosLink input, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 16-bit TosLink data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.

1020Rotelfig22

Fig.22 Rotel Michi P5, USB input, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 16-bit USB data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.

I investigated whether the sidebands with S/PDIF data were due to jitter or to something else, like supply noise on the DAC chip's voltage reference pin, by performing narrow-band spectral analyses with 24-bit data representing full-scale tones at 5, 10, 15, and 20kHz. If the sidebands were due to supply noise, the levels of the sidebands would remain the same at all four signal frequencies. If they were due to jitter, their levels would drop as the frequency of the signal reduced. This turned out to be the case (fig.23). The sidebands in fig.21 are due to poor jitter rejection at the S/PDIF inputs.

1020Rotelfig23

Fig.23 Rotel Michi P5, TosLink input, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output with 24-bit data representing full-scale tones at 5kHz (left channel yellow, right channel red), 10kHz (left cyna, right magenta), 15kHz (left green, right, gray), and 20kHz (left blue, right red).

Tested via its line-level inputs, Rotel's Michi P5 offered superb measured behavior—its astonishingly low distortion means that at the output levels at which it will typically be used, it will indeed be a "straight wire with gain," in Peter Walker's classic phrase. The phono input also offers very low distortion and noise, particularly in its moving-magnet mode, and its RIAA correction is one of the most accurate I have measured. However, the Michi P5 is let down by its digital inputs. While their distortion is not high enough to have audible consequences, especially in the right channel, the poor jitter rejection of the S/PDIF inputs is a matter of concern. I recommend staying with the USB digital input.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
The Rotel Co. Ltd.
US distributor: Sumiko
6655 Wedgwood Rd. N, Suite 115
Maple Grove, MN 55311-2814
(510) 843-4500
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
MFK's picture

Thank you for a thorough review of the preamp's technology and performance. For the money, this looks like a winner. It's beautiful to look at and sounds very good. I'm shocked, shocked (!) that the China bashing hasn't begun. Tony, where are you? :)

tonykaz's picture

I don't bash China, I'm disappointed with Domestic Manufacturers abandoning their labor base, I abandon them for it.

I was a Rotel Dealer in the 1980s when the gear was made in Japan, it was competitive but nothing special. ( or so we thought ).

I'm impressed that Mr. Micallef felt the device comparable with his Haut Brion gear, was it good enough to keep close to hand ? was it a keeper ? Reviewers keep great gear ( or should I say borrow on a long term loan basis ) to help frame other reviewed gear.

Reading this review has me starting a hunt for a Haut Brion piece for my personal evaluation.

Overall, this was a strong Haut Brion endorsement on the small shoulders of a glossy do-it-all Rotel.

Mr.Micallef is a gifted writer, he reads like he's speaking directly to me. phew, he's talented.

I know what I want out of life and I know what I want out of a Pre-amp: I want a phenomenal singing voice. ( which comes from carefully selected Russian Tubes in a simple electrical circuit )!

It just seems that the P5 is a Glossy piece of China made to catch eyes while sitting idle on a Dealer Shelf. It might do everything well or it might not.

however

If I wanted or craved glossy Chinese I'd certainly have the pure Chinese Woo Firefly sitting on my shelf. Made in Long Island, NY 11101. ph.917-773-8645 ( for 1/4 the price of the Best Buy Rotel piece )

Tony in Venice

ps. proud to be the sole Chinesium basher of these pages.

PipHelix's picture

Made in Long Island City, NY to be fair, part of the borough of Queens and thus part of NYC, not the suburban wasteland east of the city. Not to be a hater, but I escaped those suburbs a few decades ago.

But thanks for saying this! I had no idea there was serious audio equipment being made within a 20 minute walk of where I live now!

tonykaz's picture

don-cha think ?

I wonder which of the Bouroughs have the highest density of Audiophiles. ( maybe Brooklyn ? )

Tony in Venice

JaimeB's picture
James K Byrnes's picture

I am finally in the market for some hi-fi gear. I did an audition of the Michi X5 and was blown away, but I can't help but wonder if the P5/S5 might sound even better. Any input would be greatly appreciated.

X