How similar is this solid state amp to their tube models.
What makes Macintosh amps sound unique over other brands? Obviously they have a classic look with the VU meters. But a lot of company's out there like NAD c298 have good amps at lower prices. What makes the Macs unique and a better option.
I was only able to hear a tube Macintosh amp in a stereo store with similar Focal speakers that I have. The first thing I noticed is that it provides a pleasant sound. Smooth, detailed, and full sounding. The Audio Control amp in comparison had a brighter top end. After a while it was a little fatiguing. I actually preferred my Adcom 555 over it.
The Macintosh did have a tube like character to it. I can understand why some people don't care for its sound. It has a rounder sound and the high end is not enhanced. Some may want a more open or enhanced top end. Depending on your pre amp, speakers and room size will help determine what amp is best for you. I personally like the sound a lot, but a more neutral class D amp I can see some preferring, especially with class D amps getting better.
It is like some like API, some prefer Neve, while others like the cleaner sound of SSL recording gear. I really want to hear the Mac MC152 to confirm if this would be one of the better choices for me to replace my Adcom.