I don't like them either. However, Steve Winwood came out with a new disc a year or so ago called "About Time." I had heard and seen the taping of the disc at Austin City Limits and really liked the sound. Anyway, I go buy the dual disc, which in this case is really cool, you get a dual disc with live versions of some of the tracks and DVD. Then, you also get a straight CD with the studio tracks. All 3 sides (the CD being a seperate disc) for 16 bucks or so.
Sounds great, huh? I get home and the idiots had put the DVD on the CD as well as the dual disc! I took the disc back and tried another with the same results.
Quote: SACD and DVD-Audio are dead in the water, and yet the same recording industry who tried to hustle these moribund formats are now trying shove DVD down our thoats by attempting to force consumers to help recoup the costs of DVD by inextricably linking the DVD format to Redbook CDs! This is nothing more than the major recording labels shaking-down consumers. Mafia-like, indeed.
Five new Sony SACD titles announced....some drawing from previously-released 5.1 DualDisc titles.
In light of the fact that Sony/BMG is emerging as one of the recording industry's most notorious propagators of hidden Digital Rights Management (DRM) and other such Draconian measures, I don't share your excitement here.
For now I am staying in the SACD camp. I will not do dual disc and will not buy any artist on them no matter what. DVD-A requires video assistance and it is out as well. It seams that SACD continues to thrive on some level and I believe that many smaller, independent labels will keep it alive as an audiophile article. The only draw back I see is that you must buy a very good player to extract all that SACD has to offer, usually $1K or more, but that is what being an audiophile is all about...show me the money. I find SACD done well to be remarkable. To think of my Dad's old 78's and where we have come...and still complain...it is almost comical.
Doesn't this thread belong on the Rants/Raves section?
Sorry. Couldn't resist.
Not much to add except I also have negative feelings about this one. Being saddled with a higher price tag for unneeded/unwanted content in a format inaccessible/unusable by the buyer is a bogus deal. Perhaps if there is compelling extra content on a Dual Disc I might be convinced to change my mind.
As far as the hi-res format debate goes, I've stood clear of that one. When it comes to audio, I am decidedly 2-channel old school.
Well... too lazy to deal with vinyl. Call me neo-retro Redbook old-school?
I don't like them either. However, Steve Winwood came out with a new disc a year or so ago called "About Time." I had heard and seen the taping of the disc at Austin City Limits and really liked the sound. Anyway, I go buy the dual disc, which in this case is really cool, you get a dual disc with live versions of some of the tracks and DVD. Then, you also get a straight CD with the studio tracks. All 3 sides (the CD being a seperate disc) for 16 bucks or so.
Sounds great, huh? I get home and the idiots had put the DVD on the CD as well as the dual disc! I took the disc back and tried another with the same results.
KISS...Keep It Simple Stupid!
Five new Sony SACD titles announced....some drawing from previously-released 5.1 DualDisc titles.
Article on upcoming Sony SACD releases....
http://www.highfidelityreview.com/news/news.asp?newsnumber=19405607
In light of the fact that Sony/BMG is emerging as one of the recording industry's most notorious propagators of hidden Digital Rights Management (DRM) and other such Draconian measures, I don't share your excitement here.
For now I am staying in the SACD camp. I will not do dual disc and will not buy any artist on them no matter what. DVD-A requires video assistance and it is out as well. It seams that SACD continues to thrive on some level and I believe that many smaller, independent labels will keep it alive as an audiophile article. The only draw back I see is that you must buy a very good player to extract all that SACD has to offer, usually $1K or more, but that is what being an audiophile is all about...show me the money. I find SACD done well to be remarkable. To think of my Dad's old 78's and where we have come...and still complain...it is almost comical.
Doesn't this thread belong on the Rants/Raves section?
Sorry. Couldn't resist.
Not much to add except I also have negative feelings about this one. Being saddled with a higher price tag for unneeded/unwanted content in a format inaccessible/unusable by the buyer is a bogus deal. Perhaps if there is compelling extra content on a Dual Disc I might be convinced to change my mind.
As far as the hi-res format debate goes, I've stood clear of that one. When it comes to audio, I am decidedly 2-channel old school.
Well... too lazy to deal with vinyl. Call me neo-retro Redbook old-school?