Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Can't we all just get along? Especially if time is taken to learn from each other in improving and advancing both weaknesses and strengths.
Pundits claim that home theater has taken over the consumer electronics market. We're curious to see what effect it has had on our readers. How would you describe yourself?
In 1998, I purchased a mid-fi home theater system, and while getting to know the system I found that my interests were more heavily weighted towards music than movies. Since then, I have slowly been retro fitting my system to be more music/audiophile oriented. The home theater aspect of my system holds true, but I get far more enjoyment from my audio oriented equipment, namely my YBA CD player.
An audiophile (in training) only, the effect of home theater is having to bite my toungue when my co-workers boast about their Best Buy subwoofers and softball sized surround speakers to help them watch the typical Holywood movie, while I want to scream, "There's so much more to enjoy from music!"
I have never seen a movie in which I have sufficient interest for multiple viewings to justify a purchase of said movie. There are hundreds of music recordings that I would happily listen to dozens of times each. I hate the way movie soundtracks are recorded and to my ears, the worst offenses of those are mitigated by playing them through a two-channel sound system optimized for music. THX is a bombastic travesty, impressive for about 15 minutees and then very fatiguing. I have never heard a home theater system that is at all tolerable for music or nearly as enjoyable for movies as my two-channel music system. Its mostly a matter of execution, but until the home theater hardware and software folks get their ears cleaned out, no thanks from this audiophile.
It is a cost factor. Why invest in a hi-fi HT system to watch, maybe, one or two movies a week. Less expensive to go to the movie theater and invest into a good two-channel system. I agree that a good HT ( with SimAudio, Bryston or Sunfire for a few example) would be nice but it is an expensive way to watch movies.
Even in the dark days when I sold stereo gear retail at a chain store, I found that I could turn down the sound and retain the customer's attention over a picture, but lost the same customer's attention immediately with the picture off and the sound up. Watch babies, kittens, puppies or any other animal. Everything reacts to sound FIRST, and then to vision - substance over flash every time.
I watch a lot of movies at home, but I Love music the most. With the new multichannel audio formats taking shape I am considering a multichannel system that I can also use to watch movies. It's hard (impossible?) to find a system that does both equally well, but I would be fine with a so-so home theater that does audio extremely well.
I have limited disposable income. I have committed the heresy of combining my audio and video systems. Not only that, my speakers are placed on each side of my TVin a cornerand at an angle! I wish that it were not so, and maybe someday when the basement is finished the audio will have at least equal consideration as the video.
No home theater rig is planned for my household. I 'dmuch rather listen to LPs and CDs on my hi-fi. my 19" Sharp 15-year-old, made-in-the-USA TV is connected to my listening hi-fi via my VCR. i rent, maybe four vhs tapes a year, sometimes listening through the hi-fi, sometimes not.
I watch mostly classic rather than current or recent movies, so sound spectaculars are generally not on the menu. Even when I do watch newer movies, they tend not to be the type of Hollywood action flicks HT seems designed for. But even when I do want to watch a modern action movie, more often than not I find the overhyped soundtrack treatments to be mostly annoying instead of entertaining, and higher fidelity only exacerbates this. But I'm probably pretty atypical of most Stereophile readers, in that I don't even run my TV sound through an outboard system at all - I actually prefer to minimize the boob-tube's contribution to my home environment by simply keeping the audio confined to the set (a meager 27") and lo-fi. (BTW, this approach makes the sonic contrast when I switch to listening to music through the system all that much more glorious and sanctified!)
I have a pretty good interest in home theater but music is my big passion. In some contexts, I suppose I could be called an audiophile. But I don't have very much knowledge of the physics behind sound, or the inner workings of audio components. But I still love music and components that play it. So with that, I consider myself a devout audio enthusiast.
The serious music system is an assembly of two-channel components in a dedicated room; stark and utilitarian, it's just the hardware, the software and a couple of director's chairs. The home-theater system is embedded into the family room decor.