bwright
bwright's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 3 months ago
Joined: Aug 2 2006 - 8:54pm
Avalon Symbol
bifcake
bifcake's picture
Offline
Last seen: Never ago
Joined: Nov 27 2005 - 2:27am

I don't like Avalons. They tend to have very sloppy bass and buzzing highs. I think there are much better speakers for that price on the market.

jackfish
jackfish's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 years 6 months ago
Joined: Dec 19 2005 - 2:42pm

I liked the Avalon Evolution NP 2.0s but they did not take me to the place the Vandersteen 2Ce Signature IIs had which are less expensive. I'm sure if I had listened to them side by side the Vandersteens would have shamed them. I would think the Vandersteen 3A Signature would be a better value, but I have not heard the Avalon Symbol. If it needs a subwoofer for adequate low frequency extension, that right there would be a turn off for me.

commsysman
commsysman's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 4 months ago
Joined: Apr 4 2006 - 11:33am

I agree that the Vandersteens are better-sounding than those Avalons.

I had Vandersteen 2 speakers for several years, and then went to the Vandersteen 3A for more bass. Unfortunately, however, then I built a new house where my living room is 15 by 40 feet, and the 3A's do not have the bass capability for such a large room, so I had to add a pair of Vandersteen 2WQ subwoofers.

In my old house where the living room was 12 by 25, the 3A's had enough bass, but what I REALLY should have done was keep the Model 2's and added first one subwoofer at the old house and a second subwoofer when I moved; that would have bben cheaper...lol.

Log in or register to post comments
-->
  • X