Audio Alchemy DPA-1M monoblock power amplifier Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

Logistical issues meant that I measured a different sample of the Audio Alchemy DPA-1M (serial no. 10016050098) from those auditioned by Robert Deutsch. I performed a full set of measurements, using my Audio Precision SYS2722 system (see the January 2008 "As We See It"). As the DPA-1M has a class-D output stage, for almost all measurements I used, ahead of the analyzer, an Audio Precision AUX-0025 passive low-pass filter, which eliminates noise above 200kHz that would otherwise contaminate the measurements; for the 1kHz output power tests, I also used a 20kHz brickwall low-pass filter.

The DPA-1M's voltage gain into 8 ohms measured 24.55dB from both its balanced and unbalanced inputs when set to Low gain, and 30.3dB when set to High gain. Both inputs preserved absolute polarity (ie, were non-inverting). The unbalanced input impedance measured 13k ohms across the audioband, the balanced input impedance a consistent 19k ohms. The output impedance was low for a design with a class-D output stage: 0.07 ohm at low and middle frequencies, rising slightly to 0.11 ohm at 20kHz. As a result, the modification of the amplifier's frequency response with the impedance of our standard simulated loudspeaker (fig.1, gray trace) was minimal. This graph, taken with the balanced input and High gain setting, reveals that the amplifier's output rolls off sharply above the audioband, though the response at 20kHz is down by an inconsequential 0.35dB. This increased slightly, to –0.5dB, in the Low gain condition. A 10kHz squarewave was reproduced with a critically damped overshoot on its leading edges (fig.2).

816aal.AADPAfig1.jpg

Fig.1 Audio Alchemy DPA-1M, balanced frequency response at 2.83V into: simulated loudspeaker load (gray), 8 ohms (blue), 4 ohms (magenta), 2 ohms (red) (0.5dB/vertical div.).

816aal.AADPAfig2.jpg

Fig.2 Audio Alchemy DPA-1M, small-signal, 10kHz squarewave into 8 ohms.

Without the Audio Precision low-pass filter and with the input shorted to ground, there was 42.4mV of RF noise present at the speaker terminals, with a center frequency of 401kHz. This is equivalent to an unweighted, wideband signal/noise ratio of just 37.23dB ref. 2.83V into 8 ohms. With the AP filter, the ratio improved to 74.1dB (High gain) and 75.9dB (Low gain). Restricting the measurement bandwidth to 22Hz–22kHz improved the ratios to 85.1 and 87.4dB; an A-weighting filter gave further improvement, to 88.8 and 92.2dB. Fig.3, taken in the Low-gain condition, indicates that while spuriae are present at the AC mains frequency and its odd-order harmonics, these are at a low level.

816aal.AADPAfig3.jpg

Fig.3 Audio Alchemy DPA-1M, Low gain, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 1W into 8 ohms (linear frequency scale).

Fig.4 plots the percentage of THD+noise against output power into 8 ohms. The DPA-1M exceeds its specified power of 325W into that load (25.1dBW), clipping at 380W (25.8dBW). (We define clipping as happening when the THD+N reaches 1%.) However, into 4 ohms (fig.5), the DPA-1M clipped at 375W (22.75dBW). I plotted how the THD+N percentage changed with frequency at a level—8.95V, equivalent to 10W into 8 ohms, 20W into 4 ohms, and 40W into 2 ohms—at which I could be sure I was looking at actual distortion rather than noise. The result (fig.6) shows that while the distortion is very low into 8 ohms (blue trace), it rises in the treble and into lower impedances (magenta and red).

816aal.AADPAfig4.jpg

Fig.4 Audio Alchemy DPA-1M, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 8 ohms.

816aal.AADPAfig5.jpg

Fig.5 Audio Alchemy DPA-1M, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 4 ohms.

816aal.AADPAfig6.jpg

Fig.6 Audio Alchemy DPA-1M, THD+N (%) vs frequency at 8.9V into: 8 ohms (blue), 4 ohms (magenta), 2 ohms (red).

Fig.7 reveals that the distortion primarily consists of spuriae at the waveform's zero-crossing points. This generally correlates with the presence of high-order harmonics; but at high powers (fig.8), the predominant harmonic is the subjectively benign second, at –84dB (0.006%). The level of this harmonic increased to –70dB (0.03%) into 4 ohms, and a regular series of higher-order harmonics appeared, though at lower levels than this. Intermodulation distortion was relatively low, however (fig.9), even at a level, 100W into 8 ohms, where the red clipping LED was just starting to illuminate.

816aal.AADPAfig7.jpg

Fig.7 Audio Alchemy DPA-1M, 1kHz waveform at 12W into 8 ohms, 0.0084% THD+N (blue); distortion and noise waveform with fundamental notched out (red, not to scale).

816aal.AADPAfig8.jpg

Fig.8 Audio Alchemy DPA-1M, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 100W into 8 ohms (linear frequency scale).

816aal.AADPAfig9.jpg

Fig.9 Audio Alchemy DPA-1M, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–24kHz, 19+20kHz at 100W peak into 8 ohms (linear frequency scale).

Although Audio Alchemy's DPA-1M offers an astonishingly high output power for such a small, lightweight amplifier, its measured performance reveals that it will operate at its best into higher impedances. Speakers that drop below 4 ohms are best avoided.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
Audio Alchemy LLC
7960 Pearl Street
Ventura, CA 91320
(805) 794-2418
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
funambulistic's picture

To me, that was what AA was - innovative products at (reasonably) affordable prices, which is just like the new Schiit. They had an extensive line of kit, ranging from quite affordable to just out of reach (by my financial standards). I had an AA DLC (Digital Line Converter) and it was the best pre-amp I have ever owned. Congrats to the new AA but their prices are gradually becoming too dear. Stick to the basics, AA, and give us those those affordable products!

Anton's picture

Dude, that is the new 'affordable!'

;-D

georgehifi's picture

Att JA:
Please go back to showing what coming out of the output with the square wave shots as you normally do with Class D, instead of filtering it all out???? As what you've shown, this is not what gets to the speakers and i think is a bit misleading?

Quote JA: "I used, ahead of the analyzer, an Audio Precision AUX-0025 passive low-pass filter, which eliminates noise above 200kHz that would otherwise contaminate the measurements; for the 1kHz output power tests, I also used a 20kHz brickwall low-pass filter."

Cheers George

John Atkinson's picture
georgehifi wrote:
Please go back to showing what coming out of the output with the square wave shots as you normally do with Class D, instead of filtering it all out????

The only difference is that the tops and bottoms of the squarewave are obscured by HF noise, the level of which I still mention in the text. See, for example, fig.13 at http://www.stereophile.com/content/bel-canto-design-black-amplification-system-measurements. If I filter the noise, you can then see overshoot and ringing, when it exists, which I think more significant.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

georgehifi's picture

I find it more informative to see the HF noise on the square wave, this then gives me an indication of how good the manufacturers filtering is, as it's shown now it say nothing, because it's not the real thing.

Cheers George

dce22's picture

In ucd and ncore design it's the same squarewave + 400khz 350milivolt RMS sinewave added nothing special.

On the 7th page (the last page) you can see UCD switchmode signal on high bandwith analog scope that can capture couple Mhz more than AP can and on the 6th page you can see bad Class D that pollute the airwaves
http://www.hypex.nl/docs/appnotes/EMI_appnote.pdf

The use of AUX-0025 low pass filter is not needed for measuring ucd/ncore class d(it's better not to use it the big coil of wire pickup noise and distort the signal), but you have to switch on AES17 filter so that 400khz signal not miscalibrate the AP scale.

The guy who design ucd class d does not have AUX-0025
http://repforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/topic,327.msg5253.html#msg5253

Cheers.

Les's picture

It would have been interesting to compare this to the NAD M22, which is based on the more advanced (?) nCore module. While not a monoblock and not as powerful, the M22 is at least priced accordingly (compared to the DPA-1M). I would imagine a person looking into the AA amp would also consider the NAD M22 as well...

X