Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Not a prodect for the purist.
We saw quite a few new multichannel analog preamps (intended for use with multichannel SACD and DVD-Audio) from several high-end manufacturers at the recent CES. These preamps do not decode DVD-Video multichannel and are strictly for audio use. Does this type of product interest you?
I'm not into multichannel audio now and really don't have any plans to do so in the near future. Even if I were to purchase an SACD player, it would be in a stereo setup mode. But if I ever change my mind, this type of equipment would be what I would look for, 'cause I don't mix my audio and my video. And I don't plan to start!!
I have a very good two-channel system that delivers all the ambience, imaging and surround I need. I often find that listening to more than two channels distracts me and actually takes away from the musicality. Besides, even if I wanted to go that way, my listening room cannot accomodate all of those speakers, nor could my budget. Six channels of amplification at $3000/channel is just not in the realm of affordability. Two channels are. A good two channel system with correct loudspeaker placement and room acoustics will probably be superior to most multichannel setups because the opportunity to mess things up grows exponentially with more channels. By the way, the most under-rated piece of audio equipment is the high quality parametric equalizer. No room is perfect and properly tuning the system to the room can dramatically improve the sound. This is not easy but could be offered as a service from audio dealers. Unfortunately there are only a few of these such units on the market and outside of professional mastering engineers in very high end studios, no one even knows they exist.
I currently run two completely seperate systems. A high end 2-channel system and a low budget surround system. I dont feel the need to go crazy to listen to explosions and people talking in movies. As for DVD-A, I am just not interested, I don't see or feel it being as moving as a good two channel performance on a good system.
At least, not yet. This great technology is still rather new & it's better to wait. When DVD-A & multi channel SACD were introduced last year, I was excited & wanted to be part of the evolution. Well, as I did more research, I found that the multichannel idea is not too user friendly to people with limited space & not to even mention the cost to run additional high-end cables, full range speakers, & accessories . . . .In the end, I decided to stick with two channels & got myself a SONY SCD-1 SACD player. Very happy.
As a heathen Hafler-ite of several decades, auld engrained habits just refuse modern modification, sometimes! Amplification has gone from tubes to solid-state, begrudgingly! Sound source has morphed from vinyl to digital, although the albums remain for their artwork-n-sound contrasts! Tweeters have also changed,from dynamics to piezos, to extend what time-n-nature have removed(though those "west coast" Altec-Lansing crossover caps remain)! But no speakers have ever bettered, to these ears, those once discarded 12" Utah guitar speakers (MS-12G2A's left-n-right,MS-12R2RC center) wired in Hafler surround-sound configuration! They continue to deliver exactly what they're fed! And just like in late, lamented Winterland, sound perspective changes from different spots in the room!Thus no one is cheated for not being positioned in that sound-staging sweet spot! Add another blasphemy: They do a great job delivering home theater bombastics! Dialog is always front-n-center, with Enterprise or Deep Space Nine's rumble eminating from KLH model 17 rear channels(powered by separate amplification, natch; using one amp for all four channels collapses the front channels' separation)! Let them modern whipper-snappers indulge in Dolby digital,sub-woofered panoramas! This grizzled gray goat will continue to enjoy Dave Hafler's generic dawn-of-stereo surround sound system!