ARCAM Radia A25 integrated amplifier Measurements Page 2

To examine the performance of the A25's DAC, I used the coaxial and optical S/ PDIF inputs, both of which accepted data sampled at rates up to 192kHz, and USB-C data sourced from Roon on my iPad mini. (My MacBook Pro, which I usually use to test devices with USB ports, doesn't have a USB-C port, and the USB A–C adapter cables I had to hand had the wrong gender USB-A connector.)

The ARCAM's digital inputs preserved absolute polarity from all the outputs. With the volume control set to the maximum, the A25's output level into 8 ohms at the speaker outputs with a 1kHz tone at –25dBFS was 19.92V, which is just 3dB below the clipping voltage. With a 1kHz tone at –20dBFS, the output level was 4.725V at the headphone output and 972mV from the Preamplifier output. As is often the case with integrated amplifiers, the A25's DAC offers much higher gain than is necessary.


Fig.10 ARCAM A25, TosLink input, impulse response (one sample at 0dBFS, 44.1kHz sampling, 4ms time window).


Fig.11 ARCAM A25, USB-C input, impulse response (one sample at 0dBFS, 44.1kHz sampling, 4ms time window).

The Menu/Settings button on the ARCAM A25's front panel and on the remote control doesn't offer a choice of reconstruction filters. Fig.10 shows the A25's impulse response with 44.1kHz S/PDIF data. The filter is a short minimum-phase type. However, the impulse response with USB data (fig.11) was different. This response is typical of the ESS DAC chip's hybrid filter (footnote 1), with most of the ringing following the single high sample.


Fig.12 ARCAM A25, USB-C input, wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS (left channel red, right magenta) and 19.1kHz tone at 0dBFS (left blue, right cyan) into 100k ohms with data sampled at 44.1kHz (20dB/vertical div.).


Fig.13 ARCAM A25, TosLink input, wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS (left channel red, right magenta) and 19.1kHz tone at 0dBFS (left blue, right cyan) into 100k ohms with data sampled at 44.1kHz (20dB/vertical div.).


Fig.14 ARCAM A25, TosLink input, frequency response at –12dBFS into 100k ohms with data sampled at: 44.1kHz (left channel green, right gray), 96kHz (left cyan, right magenta), and 192kHz (left blue, right red) (1dB/vertical div.).

The magenta and red traces in fig.12 show the USB filter's ultrasonic rolloff with data sampled at 44.1kHz. They reach full stop-band attenuation at half the sample rate (this indicated by the vertical green line), with the aliased image at 25kHz of a full-scale tone at 19.1kHz (cyan, blue) suppressed by 100dB. The harmonics associated with the 19.1kHz tone all lie at or below –85dB. With the short S/PDIF filter (fig.13), full stop-band attenuation isn't reached until 28kHz, with the aliased image at 25kHz suppressed by just 30dB. The frequency response with 44.1kHz data and the S/PDIF filter starts to roll off above 15kHz, reaching –4dB at 20kHz (fig.14, green and gray traces).


Fig.15 ARCAM A25, digital inputs, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS with: 16-bit data (left channel cyan, right magenta), 24-bit data (left blue, right red) (20dB/vertical div.).


Fig.16 ARCAM A25, Toslink input, waveform of undithered 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS, 16-bit data (left channel blue, right red).


Fig.17 ARCAM A25, Toslink input, waveform of undithered 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS, 24-bit data (left channel blue, right red).

An increase in bit depth from 16 to 24, with dithered data representing a 1kHz tone at –90dBFS, dropped the A25's noisefloor by 13dB (fig.15). This implies a resolution of around 18 bits. When I played undithered data representing a tone at exactly –90.31dBFS, the waveform was symmetrical, with negligible DC offset, and the three DC voltage levels described by the data were clearly defined (fig.16). With undithered 24-bit data (fig.17), the A25 output a somewhat noisy sinewave.


Fig.18 ARCAM A25, Toslink input, 24-bit data, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at –3dBFS into 300 ohms, 44.1kHz data (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

As it had with the analog inputs, the ARCAM's digital inputs produced very low levels of harmonic distortion. Intermodulation distortion with an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones, each at –6dBFS, was also very low, though as expected from fig.13, the aliased images of the primary tones were only suppressed by 20–30dB with TosLink data (fig.18).


Fig.19 ARCAM A25, Toslink input, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 16-bit data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.


Fig.20 ARCAM A25, Toslink input, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 24-bit data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz


Fig.21 ARCAM A25, USB-C input, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 16-bit data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.


Fig.22 ARCAM A25, USB-C input, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 24-bit data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.

Fig.19 shows the spectrum of the A25's output when it was fed high-level 16-bit J-Test data via TosLink. Most of the odd-order harmonics of the undithered low-frequency, LSB-level squarewave lie close to the correct level, though the central spike that represents the high-level tone at one-quarter the sample rate (Fs/4) is surrounded by low-level sidebands of unknown origin at ±68Hz and ±441Hz. Repeating this analysis with 24-bit J-Test data unmasked another pair of sidebands at ±1.368Hz (fig.20). The ARCAM behaved better on this test with USB data (figs.21 & 22), though the sidebands at ±68Hz are still present.

To examine the performance of the A25's MM-compatible phono input, I connected a wire from one of the Audio Precsion's ground terminals to the grounding lug on the ARCAM's rear panel. This input preserved absolute polarity in all three modes at all three output types. The input impedance is specified as 47k ohms; I measured 45k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, and 38.1k ohms at 20kHz.

The maximum gain at 1kHz was a very high 83.9dB from the loudspeaker output. It was 65.67dB from the headphone output and 52.5dB from the Preamplifier outputs. To avoid overdriving the amplifier's output stage, I performed all the subsequent phono stage measurements at the headphone output, which mutes the speaker output.


Fig.23 ARCAM A25, phono input, response with RIAA correction (left channel blue, right red) (0.5dB/vertical div.).

The phono input's RIAA correction (fig.23) was extremely accurate and well matched between the channels. The lowest frequencies were rolled off, reaching –6dB at 11Hz. Channel separation was 80dB or greater across the audioband. The wideband, unweighted S/N ratio, ref. 1kHz at 5mV, assessed with the inputs shorted to ground and with the volume control set to –20dB, was a good 65.3dB in both channels. Restricting the measurement bandwidth to 22Hz–22kHz increased the ratio by 12dB, while inserting an A-weighting filter resulted in a ratio of 81.0dB.


Fig.24 ARCAM A25, phono input, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, for 10mV input with volume control set to –20dB (left channel blue, right red, linear frequency scale).

To be sure I wasn't prematurely clipping the headphone output, I examined the phono input's overload margins with the volume corol set to –40dB. The margins were impressively high from 20Hz to 20kHz, at 24dB ref. 1kHz at 5mV. The second harmonic was the highest in level in the phono input's distortion signature (fig.24), but at –100dB (0.001%) was inconsequential. The levels of the intermodulation products with an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones were equally low.

Overall, the ARCAM A25's measured performance was excellent. It offers extraordinarily low distortion from its line, phono, and digital inputs, and low noise provided the volume control is not used above a setting of –12dB or so.—John Atkinson


Footnote 1: See, for example, fig.4 here.

COMPANY INFO
ARCAM
The West Wing, Stirling House
Waterbeach
Cambridge CB25 9QE, UK
(888) 691-4171
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
cognoscente's picture

now we are talking, finally a review of a stereo item that is affordable and therefore an option for must of us. And clearly the pro and cons stated (the A and B rating for the different parts).

Physical CDs sound better than HiRes steamed music because data traffic is the largest cost item for those providers, they have every interest in not sending the best / heaviest file, so they don't do that. Despite the so-called HiRes resolutions, such a streamed file weighs 1/4 to 1/5 of the same song in full CD quality. Look at the MB's of files and you will know which one has more information. As far as I'm concerned, end of the discussion. But I'm just a layman and music enthusiast (who thinks (to?) simply), I'm not a pro.

cognoscente's picture

btw, this is exactly why I buy and download music (and not stream it - I use my iPhone as an iPod for storage). Sometimes I buy HiRes files if I think it is really better (recent recording and the right music for it) so I usually buy just CD quality (44/16) files. Didn't I read here recently that the vast majority of exhibitors at the Montreal fair also used 44/16 files to demostrate their equipment?

PressureX Blood Support's picture

Pressure X™ is a unique blend of natural ingredients that work together to promote healthy blood pressure levels and support overall heart health. This blend includes odorless garlic extract and hawthorn berries, which have been used for centuries to naturally promote healthy blood pressure levels. Additionally, cayenne fruit, parsley root, olive leaves, hops flowers, valerian root, and reishi mushrooms work together to provide a comprehensive approach to support cardiovascular health.

Read More :-
https://www.facebook.com/pressurexbloodsupport
https://speckn.com/pressure-x-blood-support

hb72's picture

.. and why I miss Audiostream: In my experience, streaming highres files (here from a modestly priced pro-ject stream box s2 ultra, powered by some lin PSU, and sourcing music from Qobuz or a FLAC filled SSD attached to the streamer via usb, all in all, way better in SQ than a PC): IMHO SQ is not necessarily softer nor harder, but, with ethernet connected, all results are possible, also dependent on "the network" ie, the "quality" of lan cables, galvanic isolator (cheap or expensive or absent), choice of network switches, their own (lin or SM)PSU. In the best case, music is snappy, clean and touchy, and if things are suboptimal, music can come across as etherical, softened w.r.t. PRaT, and Monet-like where it wasn't intended (though that can be nice too), or OTOH overly rough. A rabbit hole, and, seemingly, everything matters, except perhaps whether Roon is used or not.
I hear there are streamers out there that are more indifferent to "network quality".
And yes, higher resolution files usually sound a bit better (finer, easy to tell), identical mastering provided.

PS: a shoutout to Jim Austin for his latest article on an expensive network switch in the new edition of Stereophile: admirable in approach and attitude when it comes to finding the right balance at a tricky topic.

cheers
HB72

Duval's picture

Herb Reichert is one of my heroes, but to be completely honest, this review reads a bit like loveless commissioned work.

Why is it not even mentioned that the A25 is a 'Chip-Amp' presumably using something like LM3886 Chips instead of discrete transistors?

And why is it not mentioned that Arcam belongs to the Harman Group, which in turn belongs to Samsung?

Ortofan's picture

... the Radia A25 is a "chip-amp"?

https://www.audioholics.com/amplifier-reviews/arcam-a25-integrated-amp/A25internal.jpg/image

jgossman's picture

Beat me to it.

Duval's picture

@Ortofan

I stand corrected. Presumably my own image search for the A25 showed the image of a predecessor. It seems Arcam had various 'chip amps' on offer but the A25 is not one of them.

Glotz's picture

With Alta Audio Alyssa speakers and it was absolutely impressive. I have a friend that had a 90's Arcam amp finally give up the ghost a few years back and even he dropped his disdain from the painful experience (as no one wants their components to die) after hearing this demo.

The Alyssa's were most impressive with bass that fooled 2 other visually-impaired friends that were there into wondering how a small monitor speaker like that could produce such powerful bass. There was no over-warm balance on very deep tenor vocals and the speaker was a sealed design, which was even more impressive. For $5k for the speaker and really $8k for the entire system on display, this was an ear opening for everyone in the room.

This amp hits way above its weight at $1500.

Oh and Herb was pleasure to listen to in his panel with Steve Guttenberg. Sad I missed meeting him... my newbie audio friends had other plans in mind.

Turnerman1103's picture

I’m quite surprised this amp received a class A rating . I don’t sense a genuine enthusiasm from Herb in his review of the of the Radia A25 ?

X