Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
If I could go back and give the earlier me some advice, it would include this: If you see the words "bright," "too much upper-midrange energy," "upper midrange emphasis," "presence region emphasis," or "unforgiving" in a review (they mean pretty much the same thing), don't buy that piece of equipment, even if the review is positive overall. You'll end up spending a lot of time wincing at aggressive sounds as you listen, wondering how to cancel them out, and won't spend much time enjoying the music. If a reviewer spends a lot of time telling you all the things he did to make a piece of gear sound good, let that raise some questions in your mind.
The other thing is that, while it is true that more expensive stuff tends to sound better, be open to the idea that it's not ALWAYS true. I recently bought an expensive Audioquest Diamond digital coaxial cable, and it's true it did sound better than the two I had previously used, which were a Kimber KS2020 and a DH Labs D750. But on a hunch, or a suspicion, I bought a $20 Blue Jeans brand coaxial cable. After listening for quite a while, I'm not sure--at all--that the Audioquest sounds better. In fact, it seems that the Blue Jeans cable has the same level of detail, but without the hard, dry digital edge of the Audioquest.
So be careful, and don't be in a hurry to spend your money.