Scintillating Sonatas by a Man Named Bach

Two of America's finest baroque musicians, flutist Stephen Schultz and harpsichordist Jory Vinikour, have teamed up to record J.S. Bach: Sonatas for Flute and Harpsichord (Music & Arts). Available in both CD and hi-rez 24/96 formats, this sparkling collection of four sonatas was recorded in Skywalker Sound's "The Scoring Stage," whose variable acoustics were adjusted for maximum reverberation by Jack Vad (recording engineer and producer of San Francisco Symphony's recordings) and Dann Thompson (one of the in-house engineers at Skywalker). Executive Producer Kit Higginson did the editing, and Vad the producing.

The first thing to know about this recording is that while authentic baroque performance includes the interpolation of decorative ornaments, cadential trills, and other improvisatory elements, both the flute and harpsichord obbligato (accompaniment) parts were written out in full. Hence, what sets these performances apart from the many others in the catalog are the skills and taste of the musicians, the choice of tempi, authentic baroque pitch (A = 415), sound quality, and the use of copies of authentic instruments (a wooden flute for Schultz, and a copy of a 1722 German harpsichord for Vinikour). Hearing these two men discuss this recording is enlightening.

For authenticity and sound, this recording jumps way ahead of classic interpretations by Rampal and others, and provides one of the clearest examples "on record" of the sound of Bach's music as performed during his lifetime.

In addition, only two of these sonatas for flute and harpsichord, Sonata in b, BWV 1030 and Sonata in A, BWV 1032, were definitely composed by Bach. Of the two other sonatas on the program that were long attributed to the master, Sonata in E-flat, BWV 1031 may have been composed by Quantz, Graun; if it was composed by Bach, he may have consciously emulated a trio by Quantz. Sonata in g, BWV 1020 could have been composed by any number of people, including Quantz and J.S. Bach's son, C.P.E. Bach.

Finally, the recording offers a fine test for your system. Any set-up that robs Schultz's flute of its intrinsic glowing warmth, or makes Vinikour's harpsichord sound brittle, is in need of, at the minimum, a tune-up.

Beyond all that is the music itself, which is wonderful. It's easy to fall in love with the lyric grace of the B minor sonata's second movement Largo e dolce, and the non-stop virtuosity of its subsequent Presto. Those looking for happier music, as well as folks who are under the mistaken impression that everything Bach wrote is serious and churchy, will hit repeat once they encounter the joyous, head-bobbing Vivace that begins the Sonata in A. Nor do this sonata's delights end there. Once you hear the grace of its middle movement and the unbridled sparkle of its concluding Allegro, this sonata will likely become a personal favorite.

The Sonata in E-flat s far more sing-songy in its short opening movement, lyrical in its well-known Siciliano, and sweet and upbeat in its concluding Allegro. The Sonata in g begins with delicious rapid flute figures. After a lovely and song-like middle movement Adagio with a touch of longing, it ends with an irrepressibly joyful Allegro. The conclusion's mimicking repetition between flute and harpsichord obbligato is a special delight. Even Bach lovers who already have numerous recordings of these sonatas in their collections will want to give this one a whirl.

Note that these are not the only recently released hi-rez period instrument performances of Bach sonatas that showcase Vinikour's artistry. He has recently joined his longtime friend and colleague Rachel Barton Pine to record Bach's Sonatas for Violin & Harpsichord for Cedille in both 2-CD and hi-rez formats. As such, these recording comes into direct competition with recent hi-rez efforts from Isabelle Faust and Kristian Bezuidenhout for Harmonia Mundi, and from Lucy Russell and John Butt for Linn. Triple brownie points for the first devoted Stereophile reader who listens to all three recordings back-to-back in hi-rez, and posts a report.

COMMENTS
dalethorn's picture

The harpsichord sound is nice and the overall ambiance is perfect, but the flute seems particularly intense. I suppose then, as you noted, that my system may be in need of a minimal tuneup.

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Like a tube amp perhaps? ..........

dalethorn's picture

A tube amp would mellow the intensity of that flute a little, but a better solution if I wanted to do it would be to go for greater resolution. The wood flute sounds real enough, and wood has its own peculiar resonances, but in my limited experience I hear a similar thing here as when mass voices sometimes sound too intense or "hard", as though they were creating a new resonance by not resolving the individual details. So for me the solution isn't additional tuning per se, it's getting more resolution.

Bogolu Haranath's picture

You may be talking about IMD ......... Perhaps .......

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Loudspeakers "try" to reduce IMD by dividing the audio spectrum with 2 or 3 drivers, treble, mid and bass (drivers) ......... If the IMD occurs in the midrange, they can use 2 or more drivers to divide that mid frequency ........... It is difficult (if not impossible) to do all this with a single driver headphone ......... It may (again may) be possible to reduce IMD with multiple BA drivers (by dividing the frequency for example) in the in-ear model 'phones .......

dalethorn's picture

All of that may be correct, but if I had the Sennheiser HD800 here with the appropriate amp, it would resolve. Most people who hear it for the first time with the right recording can scarcely believe their ears.

Bogolu Haranath's picture

BTW, the same problems which affect the single transducer headphone (like the IMD), also affect the single transducer microphone ............

dalethorn's picture

I don't want to get into a big microphone topic here like happened elsewhere recently, so I'll just say that IMD (and/or resonances) in transducers is a huge topic that needs its own area for discussion. That's it for me.

RH's picture

....I was wondering what Robert Plant was up to these days!

;-)

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Another great recommendation from JVS .........Keep them coming JVS ......... Enjoy the music with a flute of great champagne ...........

cookiemarenco's picture

Thank you, Jason! Made me want to take the "listening back to back" challenge!

Cookie Marenco
Blue Coast Music

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

who are enthused by and keep talking about / listening to the music.

jason

dalethorn's picture

Maybe I should ask for just 2-1/2....

The Faust-Bezuidenhout is fairly bright and the violin close-up, so I might be hearing a little more 'edge' than I expected. The Pine-Vinikour is more spacious and/or distant, and the harpsichord seems to have more body. The Russell-Butt is the most distant (seems typical for John Butt), and the overall sound is more subdued than the Pine-Vinikour, and dramatically moreso than the Faust-Bezuidenhout.

These are all good, but I'm keeping my hand on the volume and treble controls when switching. BTW, Rachel's presentation on the bows is fascinating.

There's a short anecdote in the Linn Records liner about Bach saying many others could be as good a composer if they worked harder. Reminds me of Edison's line about invention being one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration.

Bogolu Haranath's picture

That 1% and 99% analogy is true for success in life too ..........

dalethorn's picture

I'm surprised she squeezed so much information into this video - for example, speaking of how "back then" it wasn't considered particularly good to play a piece the same way each time, but she says "I'm not talking about ornamentation". My first hearing about ornamentation was E. Power Biggs discussing how Bach actually noted an allowance for it in certain places.

Jim C.'s picture

I was wondering what to do with my 20% off coupon from HDTracks. Problem solved.

dalethorn's picture

My first comparison of the three performances (Faust/Pine/Russell) were my first impressions of the overall sound and ambiance of each one, but just as important I suppose is comparing the playing styles. The sound of the violins on these three is so different that my comparisons will suffer accordingly.

The Faust-Bezuidenhout violin sounds the most 'baroque' to me. In all three recordings, the playing styles seemed authentically baroque in terms of pacing, structure etc., but I think the violin tone sounds better on the Faust recording. It's odd that the Rachel Pine version would not be the best, given that she went to such lengths to show how it's done in her video. It might be that with the much less treble energy in her version, I just wasn't hearing some tonality that was there, but hers seemed like it could have been done with any ordinary violin. It's even more difficult to judge in the Russell-Butt version. The harpsichords sounded OK in all three - at least the differences there weren't nearly as important as with the violins.

Baroque means a lot of things I'm sure, especially to someone with the depth of experience that Jason has, but one of my standards for sound or tonality comes from tracker organs. My impression of the sound of the first generation of modern tracker organs built in the 1950's or thereabouts is that they have a 'baroque' tonality, for lack of a better word. Low-pressure pipes and fully manual trackers are key to that sound, as E. Power Biggs has described in his notes. Since that time, most such organs have been hybrids rather than true trackers. Chesky has a demo track called Organ Pedal Scale, which I think is a good example - more "growl" in the deeper notes than the much heavier weight than most modern organs produce.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Or did you stream them? If so, in what quality? Ditto if you bought the recordings as downloads.

jason

dalethorn's picture

Purchased the Faust and Pine from Presto Classical and the Russell from Linn direct. I got the "CD quality FLAC" on all three. I realize I could be missing a sliver of air and upper harmonic detail with just the 16/44 FLACs, but I guess that depends at least partly on how those 16/44 FLACs were generated from the originals.

Since the Faust and Pine both came from Presto and they sound so different, I figured the difference between the 16/44 and 24/96 wouldn't make much of a dent in that difference, but that again depends on certain things like the playback gear and listening a different way (i.e. not trying to switch back and forth quickly when my brain needs time to adjust to the differences.)

So anyway, if I start out with the Pine-Vinikour recording and resist the temptation to switch to the Faust-Bezuidenhout, it sounds just fine, and I like that extra weight in the harpsichord. And once I'm fully adjusted to the former, the latter sounds rather bright.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

You likely didn't get the true tone of the instrument without hi-rez.

dalethorn's picture

Well, there are many factors...

X