hollowman
hollowman's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 2 hours ago
Joined: May 28 2009 - 12:59pm
Impulse test for Stereophile digital Measurements
hollowman
hollowman's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 2 hours ago
Joined: May 28 2009 - 12:59pm
hollowman wrote:

I'm curious as to how formerly-reviewed NOS gear -- like Zanden and 47 Lab -- perform (methinks it will be similar to the HiFiman 602).  Perhaps more importantly, Ayre  and Cambridge Audio (both of whom putatively use MP and/or apodizing reconstruction) did not include (TTBOMK) impulse tests. It would be an interesting correlation experiment!

I just noticed that JA did perform an impulse test for the Ayre DX-5 review from Dec 2010. Interesting that it looks way better than the Meridian 808.2 from April 2009. Alas ... these units may, in their latest versions, have been upgraded in *so many ways not related to MP/apodizing filters*, that it's hard to truly know why  their SQ *actually* improved.

John Atkinson
John Atkinson's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 hours 53 min ago
Joined: Nov 7 2010 - 3:31pm

hollowman wrote:
Why isn't the impulse test done more regularly in Stereophile digital-gear measurements?

Because in 99.99% of cases, the impulse response is that of a conventional FIR filter, ie, symmetrical in the time domain with as much "ringing" before the peak as after: see the Benchmark DAC1's impulse reponse in fig.1 at http://www.stereophile.com/content/meridian-8082808i2-signature-reference-cd-playerpreamplifier-measurements. I only publish the impulse response when it is _not_ like that. You can infer the impulse response, BTW, from the undithered waveform at -90.31dBFS, which I always publish in my digital reviews. A conventional FIR filter gives symmetrical overshoots to the edges of the squarewave.

Quote:
I'm curious as to how formerly-reviewed NOS gear -- like Zanden and 47 Lab -- perform (methinks it will be similar to the HiFiman 602).

That is correct.

John Atkinson

Editor, Stereophile

hollowman
hollowman's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 2 hours ago
Joined: May 28 2009 - 12:59pm

JA, thx for your reply. That Meridian post-ring is still awfully ugly. What kind of analog filter are they using with unit (eg, no. of poles, etc.)?

Something else I realized is that newer MP/apodizing filters -- used in Meridian, Ayre, etc. -- may have (in addition to better traditional oversampling) also been written to correct for shortcomings in the A/D part of chain. So NOS's "clean" impulse plot may have v. little, if anything, to do with "NOS sound".

Back to how efficacious MP/apodizing filters are ... well, the Keith Howard-engineered tests from Jan 2006 didn't help the case for these filters! But, maybe, those were old-school MP filters; Meridian/Ayre have been busy since then, so perhaps their math is better??

hollowman
hollowman's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 2 hours ago
Joined: May 28 2009 - 12:59pm

Wadia and (I think) Theta putatively addressed time-domain issues quite early on in the reconstruction game. Anyone know how their impulse responses looked? (I went thru most of my 28-year Stereophile magazine stack (uh .. stacks!!) but found nothing.

John Atkinson
John Atkinson's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 hours 53 min ago
Joined: Nov 7 2010 - 3:31pm

hollowman wrote:

Wadia and (I think) Theta putatively addressed time-domain issues quite early on in the reconstruction game.

Wadia, yes, and Sony and Pioneer, but not Theta.

Quote:
Anyone know how their impulse responses looked? (I went thru most of my 28-year Stereophile magazine stack (uh .. stacks!!) but found nothing.

I just posted the impulse response of the Wadia 850 to the Stereophile magazine Facebook page. It is symmetrical in the time domain with minimal ringing.

John Atkinson


Editor, Stereophile

Log in or register to post comments
-->
  • X