Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
I am satisfied with my 9 year old Sony TV. I have little interest in surround sound. Music is like a tonic.
Pundits claim that home theater has taken over the consumer electronics market. We're curious to see what effect it has had on our readers. How would you describe yourself?
Guilty of the slow progression of audiophile to audiophile/videophile to videophile/audiophile and I hope it stops. Of course the fact that the music industry is following in the footsteps of Major League Baseball and forgetting who its customers are has fueled the transition!
We all know that so-called home theater has indeed taken over the consumer market. The new issue of Sound & Vision magazine points out that all the interest is in widescreen flat-panel TV's and an amazing amount of people are spending very little on the audio portion. It's all about the picture right now. Maybe it's the generation of people who grew up playing video games on TV and never paid any attention to the sound. Nobody is going to sit still and listen unless there is a movie on the screen with lots of car crashes and chase scenes. I think it has come to the point where people just have a very hard time sitting still unless there is some kind of full distraction.
The boob tube is still a boob tube when dressed up with a wide screen and a high powered multichannel sound system. Ugggh. Give me two speakers, two channels of tube SET amplification with Miles on vinyl and I am a happy man. Leave the idiot box for the kids.
As my choice indicates, I enjoy both home theater and two channel systems. My preference at this point is two channel. I simply prefer the depth of involvement a stereo system provides. With the advent of Multi-Channel SACD's and DVD-Audio, I may be changing my preference sometime in not to distant future.
One trip to the Theater will never have me thinking about how great the audio in the theater is. But watching a movie on all but the best home theaters reminds me how cost ineffective it is to try to create the experience of a zillion ince screen and small gymnasium size room with 9+ large (very) loudspeakers in a media room the size of a large bedroom.
After a number of years away from audio, I decided to invest in new gear. I purchased a decent HT system, thinking I would be happy with a dual-purpose rig. What happened however, is that it sparked a renewed interest in two-channel music, which is where I now spend most of my time and money. I still enjoy HT, but my interest in new gear is music-oriented.
I really enjoy my two channel, music only system. Occassionaly I also enjoy a film on dvd (an oxymoron, or not?), usually in someone else's home. Sometimes it's spectacular, but I don't really miss it when I go back to my two channel, music only system...
I have found that I do not really pay much attention to the audio of a movie and even find multi-channel destracting at times. My TV screen is very near the right channel speaker of my two channel system so I run it mono and turn off the left channel. There is a Velodyne HGS-18 behind the TV. This all makes for well-defined, powerful movie sound but in mono! In all fairness, I must admit that I am an audiophile first and watch few movies.
From what I see and read I am part of a shrinking minority, but quality sound is what turns me on not the latest, gratest and biggist HDTV screen. If I had $10,000 to $20,000 to spend on entertainment equipment it would all go for sound equipment. I was luckly enought 18 years ago to purchase a 27" Mitsubishi television. It put out a great picture than and still does. I have no desire to upgrade. When it finally breaks I will replace it with a $500 27". Anthing over that will go for a seperate sound system. Keep the reviews coming on sound equipment and be sure to include examples of affordable pieces. Reviews of $20,000 speakers may be of interest to the reviewers but not to me.