Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification | Digital Sources Analog Sources Featured | Accessories Music |
Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | Analog Sources Accessories Featured | Music Columns Retired Columns | Show Reports | Features Latest News Community | Resources Subscriptions |
I'm sure that will change exactly.....zero....minds.
Wasn't the purpose in the first place. What's your point (if you have any)?
What's my point?
What was your purpose?
Keld..remember. American/English humour. Sarcasm. piss taking.
Get stuffed
you need to relax, Keld...Buddha meant no harm. Man, you gotta try not to take things so seriously
Telling me this about the video I link to "I'm sure that will change exactly.....zero....minds." is
1) superfluous
2) thoughtless
3) a presumption that I am attempting to change anybody's mind, which is condescending at best
Oh, brother.
Keld, I said that as being a tease to people who will disagree with it. You think May or Geoff will suddenly watch that and admit their eyes have been opened?
I'm actually amazed one recurrent troll hasn't retorted with his clip and paste job about skepticism yet!
Look back at it and see if you think I was agreeing with you, perhaps.
Next thing, you posted that on a general audio forum, so you must have had some purpose. However, you tossed it up as a link with no fucking comment or opinion of your own about the content. What is it about the internet that people think cutting and pasting a link is an example of communication to start a thread?
So, I will ask again for some comment from you: What was your purpose?
My point was that this is an age old argument and I made a joke that no one will change their stripes.
I actually agree with the video.
So, tell us, what was your purpose?
What was your expected outcome? What is your opinion of the video? Do you agree or disagree with it?
Posting a link without comment as a form of 'content' is what, if my reply was thougthless, condescending, or superfluous?
Keld...it was a jab, a playful verbal barb..
lighten up man, seriously. if you don't , you won't last very long round here. lot of smart alecks, myself included.
Buddha is one of the nicest folks around(just dont shoot any dogs )
I'm sorry I overreacted. Maybe I had a bad day...
My purpose with the link was of course to share something I found of interest. I don't really know how to answer your last question. I will try to sharpen up, and once again, my apologies for my reaction. I was out of line.
Keld
I cannot imagine more unlikely people that you and Buddha to start a pissing match !!!
Now me and the redneck NC, absolutely !!
Seriously, its friday time to unwind, im glad to see it calmed down.
We need more fun on the forum, im writing this listening to mahler #2 far to loud !! on my second bottle of Shiraz ( no jokes about urine please ) the music is playing on my TV setup which is a set of KEF iQ speakers and an Onkyo receiver and in my current frame of mind it sounds like a million dollars !!!! because im not listening to the equipment im just enjoying the music
Alan
Hehe, there will be no pissing contests between Buddha and me, I was in a lousy mood I guess. In my opinion Buddha makes great sense on the forum, and I actually like him, so I hope thing are ok on his side too.
Both of you are wonderful assets. No mindless fighting allowed.
Clever, playful, amusing bickering encouraged.