Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
October 23, 2009 - 8:18am
#1
Fossil hailed as missing link in evolution is not even close relative
Loudspeakers Amplification | Digital Sources Analog Sources Featured | Accessories Music |
Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | Analog Sources Accessories Featured | Music Columns Retired Columns | Show Reports | Features Latest News Community | Resources Subscriptions |
Fuck Darwin. We've been done this road before. I'm willing to go again.
I knew it was wrong when they claimed it was more than 6,000 years old.
D'uh!
Ushering it in, eh?
To top it off, the flood that likely killed this fossil was actually only about 5,100 years ago.
As you know, carbon dating is a liberal atheist plot...unless it validates some religious claim, then it's OK.
The creation situation makes for GREAT science.
Have you ever tried to calculate what the Universe looked like on creation day?
All those stars and galaxies created at almost their current locations and the light from something 5 billiuon light years away having the light coming from it created only 6,000 light years from earth in order for it to arrive today, and with the proper characteristics and everything - as though it actually originated from them all that time ago!
If you ponder it, the Universe is one giant red herring!
It boggles the mind.