Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification | Digital Sources Analog Sources Featured | Accessories Music |
Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | Analog Sources Accessories Featured | Music Columns Retired Columns | Show Reports | Features Latest News Community | Resources Subscriptions |
On Oct. 26, 1994, Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin of Israel and Prime Minister Abdel Salam Majali of Jordan signed a peace treaty in a ceremony attended by President Clinton.
http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/1026.html#article
And?
There is a point in that somewhere???
You couldn't find it?
Figures, you don't have an entertainer to 'splain it to you.
This from the fellow who gets all his political opinions straight from:
That's twice you've posted that.
You're not very original, if not totally worthless, without an entertainer telling you what to think.
Pathetic!
Check your decoder ring for low batteries. Maybe O has taken over the battery companies and has fixed it so no repubs have batteries that work.
Battery death panels! What's next?
When you have something worth reading, post it. Otherwise, just go listen to someone shouting, "Socialist", like they have any idea what the word means.
Apparently the first posting didn't quite take
Not worth reading.
Oh, oh! I see, you don't remember doing the first posting. Yeah, well that's to be expected. You repubs have forgotten alot that happened in the last dozen or so years.
You had best pray the country as a whole sort of forgets today's disasters and next years power grabs for if they do not, come 2010, its good by socialists, hello Americans.
Yeah, Socialists like Goldwater, Fenwick, Whitman, Forbes...
You are living in an imaginary world built by the application of that good old saw from Goebbels, to wit: "Repetition is the linchpin of propaganda".
And you, sir, are living proof.
Yeah, yeah, you used that line before too. Scary f'ing stuff when the bunch of ya can't decide just who is "conservative enough"!
Change the friggin' channel, find another entertainer. Hannity is nuts, it's not "conservatism in exile" it's, "When do we get the next pass? It's getting crowded in here."
It also helps that what I say is true...You might be fine with your fellow travelers wandering the world screwing things up for the folk who remember America, but most folk are less thrilled.
Hannity is a blowhard. So who gives a shit? He isn't winning a new audience. Just turn the channel. I haven't watched his show in a few years. I can't believe you faggots are fighting over Hannity. You idiots sound like Obama. Fucking cry-babies. What ever happened to Air America? You queers were butt fucking in the streets when they had an audience. It's more like, "you can't be first but you can be next."...
What the hell keeps you on this forum? I was told once nobody expects anything better from you. Geez, you live down to expectations.
Someone explain to me what keeps this guy on this forum.
Back to worst and Rushbo getting punked never gets old, listening to happen it is "priceless".
#2, Whiner Will, labelled a RINO I'm sure by those who are Ronnie pure, simply can't figure out the "internets".
#3 goes to the Dallas police force who hands out tickets for incorrect language, not words but language. And the repubs are constricted to becoming a Southern state only party, think there's a connection?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/ns/msnbc_tv-countdown_with_keith_olbermann/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/ns/msnbc_tv-countdown_with_keith_olbermann/
Will somebody care to explain it to her?...
You'll need a scorecard for the top three Stooooo-Pid repubs; http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/ns/msnbc_tv-countdown_with_keith_olbermann/#33500601
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/WSJ-NBC_Poll090922.pdf
http://www.dailykos.com/tv/w/002298/
http://rawstory.com/2009/10/lieberman-promised-universal-health/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8331468.stm
Of course, he denies the connection; Brother of Afghan Leader Is Said to Be on C.I.A. Payroll;
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/world/asia/28intel.html?th&emc=th
So, our government is covertly supporting the drug trade that finances the forces who kill our soldiers?
Hard to believe until you think back to a name and an incident from the not so distant past and his ties to another President named Bush.
That name?
Eugene Hasenfus.
Trolling can be fun but spamming is so gay.
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910290044
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910300001
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910300011
'Media Matters' like Fox, wears its bias on its sleeve..
As usual you've entirely missed the truth to be found here. It's clear you have little sense for truth.
The first clip is From The Daily Show and just as easily could have been linked to that site. I just happened to be on Media Matters and pulled the clip from there. Why not go to The Daily Show and watch the same clip from their link? It will be the same, Media Matters had no need to doctor anything that was said or represented. That repubs make such good and neverending targets for satire and outright comedy is something I mentioned last week. I suspect you ignored the link. Here it is, have a look; http://forum.stereophile.com/forum/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=75856&an=0&page=1#Post75856
This thread is about things that are factual and represent the exact quotes of the people who made the comment(s). No opinions are expressed in "Fox & Friends re-enacts pro-life heckler who told Pelosi to 'burn in hell'" or in "Beck's ultimatum: 'You're either on the side of revolutionaries for Marxism... or the revolutionaries of 1776'" If you had listened to the cips you would have heard the words come out of the mouths and press releases of all those mentioned in all three clips. In this case the words happen to belong to Fox News employees. If you find their words biased and offensive, you should stop watching Fox News.
This thread is about presenting the actual words of those who are skewered and doing so to the best of my ability. I allow the words to stand for themself, nothing more and nothing less. If you take offense or find them biased, either you are allowing your own biases to control your thinking or you should take the issue up with the speakers or writers - who in this case would be Fox News employees.
I'm not the least bit interested in your Stoooo-Pid repub banter that claims some sources are illegitimate because the source isn't Party approved or doesn't come from a recognized Mouthpiece for The Party or even The Party Leader his-own-self. The words are what they are, again in this case, they are the words of Fox News and they are asinine and insulting. How can they reflect the bias of Media Matters when they are the actual words spoken? Media Matters reports, I post and you decide.
If someone wants to head to the Home page of any of the sites I link to, I am not telling them my opinion or what they should or should not believe. Why can't you do the same and stop telling everyone who are the Official Party Approved Stooges and Entertainers and who is not?
This thread is about presenting the truth of someone's words. It is not about telling The Party Line. I realize you have no use for the truth but that's what this thread is about and you'll simply have to live with that fact. If you find the words offensive, I suggest you take a long look at what you have been defending.
Such as this story;
http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910300022
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910300021
Lynne Cheney and The Mega Ditto lying about O's visit to Dover Air Base. Those are Cheney's and Limbaugh's own words. Why would I make this up when their lies are so easy to find on such a daily schedule?
If you don't care for Media Matters, that's really tough. I take what I believe is fair when it represents the actual words spoken or written and when I can I link to those words. If they are a lie, then you'll see a lie. If they are absurdities and hypocrisy, then you'll hear absurdities and hypocrisy. I generally don't comment on the lie or the slander, the words stand for themself. If you find them to be baised, then it is your own bias that is forming that conclusion.
If you're comfortatble with your Party's leaders' and mouthpieces' deceptive tactics, that's for you to consider when you are alone with your own conscience. You do remember where you put your conscience, don't you? You do know who to call to ask about morals, don't you? It's certainly not Fox News or The Party Leader who spout lies and fabrications incessantly.
And certainly not this TV evengelist; http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910290037
Media Matters also presents Democrats when they have their "awkward" moments. If you ever strayed from The Official Party Doctrine, you would realize that. There just always seem to be more lies being told by the repubs than the Dems. Therefore, you, a repub lapdog, see Media Matters as baised when in fact it is your precerption that has been distorted by the constant barage of propaganda you have willingly absorbed over the last 30+ years.
More BS from you denouncing those who are not Official Party Mouthpieces is unneccesary. You are quite unimaginative when you don't have The Party Line to fall back on, or when you don't have entertainers telling you what to think. For you to continue to repeat the same Party Line BS is boring and exceedingly tedious. Please stop.
Here's two sites you might enjoy. Notice the Stoo-Pid repubs outnumber the Dems on the first list;
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/rulings/pants-fire/
and ...
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/personalities/rush-limbaugh/
Here's someone who wouldn't know the truth if it ran her down in the street. Say! are you two related?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/personalities/michele-bachmann/
The RINO just dropped out of NY23 so Hoffman, the conservative will take the seat Tuesday..Now the only question is NJ and has Corzine bought himself another term?
Don't forget Jay had his own problems in that saga.
Hmmm, your last two posts don't seem to mean anything more than your previous eight dozen or so.
Pot calling the kettle black.
One has to know something about politics to understand most and have read Gatsby to follow the last...
No, they make no sense, just repub BS.
You have never read Gatsby?
Have you never read "Howard the Duck"?!
He ran for President in 1976 after the Nixon/Ford debacle.
F or the however many-eth time do not post how the NYT is not a Party Line media outlet.
U nderstand?
C an you understand that?
K indly refrain from posting such drivel.
Y ou are very boring when you do so.
O r, any other time for that matter.
U nderstand?
Thank you, Gov. Arnie.
You do realize that you posted that to yourself?
I reply to myself all through this thread since I'm not interested in repub BS.
Poor Stoo-Pid Lamont, can't even follow seven lines of dialog and pays no attention to The Guvernator.
No wonder you're a repub, no one requires you pay attention.
Your job is simply to listen to the entertainers in your head.
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911020009
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/77685/
Those GOP 'Stalinists (interesting transference there) are going to win the race, as are the republicans in Virginia and NJ, and by a pretty impressive margin. The country is tired of the lefts constant lying, spending, grubbing for power, and ineptness.
The politicians of both parties are totally out of touch with the voters. Those voters know it and have for years but now, as a result of the Tea Party folk, they are understanding they CAN do something about it.
The dems and 'moderate' republicans will see some very dark days next year.
You also have rubber models in your office with all the reproductive organs of both sexes that you keep locked up in separate cabinets to avoid a scandal.
Not at all, no interest whatsoever, none! none of this ridiculous "teabaggers will win" BS. Pull your head out of your ass and take a breath of reality.
I heard a good one on Halloween. The radio announcer said everyone in the studio was dressed in a costume for the holiday. He was going as Sarah Palin's new book, he was wearing a nice jacket and wouldn't be making any sense.
Especially since what the teabaggers and theocrats are asking for isn't even remotely conservative, it's actually a demand for a tyranny of mythology.
What the present "conservatives" seem to represent is a desire to usurp the constitution, violate it as much as possible, and install theocracy in the USA.
Hence we see anti-evolution quacking, attempts to control womens' bodies, treating women and children like they are property, attempts at biblical prohibitions enforced as law, and the like.
This is exactly the kind of insanity that brought down the moors during the dark ages, when they were so far ahead of the religion-ridden "west" that it wasn't even a contest.
What happened? The religious fanatics took over the moorish culture, and turned it from the culture that built elliptical arches, invented algebra, and so on, into the current wahibist nightmare.
That's where the current "conservative" wants to lead us, into death, dispair, degredation, poor health, and short, nasty lifespans. The present "conservative" wishes to bring down western civilization, in a nutshell.
You will both be horridly surprised tomorrow. You could lose all three. The Washington Post seems to see the handwriting on the wall as they have already begun advising every leftie who will listen how little the events mean nationally. That is not the line they would use if they thought their folk would or even could win...
Every day that goes by the left steps in it a little deeper and more folk in the middle notice and say 'no thank you sir'. But the left could not care less what the voters want...the left knows better.
By this time next year Obama will be in the low 40's for approval and the dem congress at a new low...you could lose more than 50 seats in the house and half a dozen in the senate.
I expect to discover this time next year that today's love for the lug and prognostications of success will all be forgotten by the left...to the amusement of the right.
Pages