Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification | Digital Sources Analog Sources Featured | Accessories Music |
Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Loudspeakers Amplification Digital Sources | Analog Sources Accessories Featured | Music Columns Retired Columns | Show Reports | Features Latest News Community | Resources Subscriptions |
nc, I assume our posts were moved to the dead zone because of the tenor of sasaudio's posts.
I guess it's easier to move them in a block, or at least I prefer to give the moderator the benefit of the doubt :-)
I will take solace in the ignore button :-)
Exactly.
No, because of changing of the subject, then the personal attacks on me without foundation, and misleading the public as we see next.
You called the results I obtained through equations and other scientific information (from my college textbooks and the RCA Radiotron Designers Handbook, written by 26 engineers) "opinion", which it is obviously not. And then I responded with:
NC, the scientific information and equations etc are solid factual engineering principles used for over 80 years when designing electronic components.
So NC and others, what happened to your sides adament beliefs in science and equations that you claim to believe in and go by and are used to measure the specifications of all electronic components? I would think your side would welcome such scientific information to inform and help the public.
It is not only easier, but necessary. That's the way the software works. When I move one post, I must also move all posts in response.
I have also lost all tolerance for this continued dispute between SAS and Ethan Winer. Any posts that re-ignite the dispute will be deleted.