Vote

Filed under
Stereophile Posted: Jan 03, 1999 58 comments

The benefits of more choice or an audiophile disaster? It seems that Sony/Philips' SACD and DVD-Audio are on a collision course in their race for the title of the next high-end audio format. If they decide to duke it out, we'll get to compare the two formats ourselves, but is this good or bad for the audiophile?

Will a format war between SACD and DVD-Audio be good or bad for audiophiles? Why or why not?
Good---let them fight it out!
23% (25 votes)
Bad---settle before going to market!
60% (66 votes)
It won't matter
9% (10 votes)
I don't care
8% (9 votes)
Total votes: 110
Filed under
Stereophile Posted: Dec 27, 1998 0 comments

Our question about <I>Stereophile</I>'s equipment reviews two weeks back generated hundreds of responses. Let's dig a little deeper: Other than equipment and music reviews, what do you find most useful or enjoyable in the magazine?

Other than equipment and music reviews, what is your favorite part of <I>Stereophile</I>?
As We See It
1% (2 votes)
Letters
10% (25 votes)
Industry Update
18% (45 votes)
Sam's Space
29% (71 votes)
Analog Corner
17% (43 votes)
Astor Place/"Undercurrents"
6% (14 votes)
Fine Tunes
8% (19 votes)
Car Tunes/"Quarter Notes"
2% (4 votes)
Manufacturers' Comments
4% (9 votes)
The Final Word
0% (0 votes)
Building a Library
3% (7 votes)
Feature stories/Interviews
3% (8 votes)
Total votes: 247
Filed under
Stereophile Posted: Dec 20, 1998 0 comments

Danger! Fragile Ego Territory! Vote for your favorite <I>Stereofool</I>!

Among <I>Stereophile</I>'s current batch of hardware scribes, who is your favorite? Use the "Comments" box to vote for writers not listed.
John Atkinson
8% (18 votes)
Wes Phillips
13% (29 votes)
Sam Tellig
28% (63 votes)
Michael Fremer
16% (35 votes)
Jonathan Scull
9% (21 votes)
Thomas J. Norton
9% (21 votes)
Martin Colloms
8% (19 votes)
Robert Deutsch
3% (6 votes)
Kalman Rubinson
2% (4 votes)
Lonnie Brownell
2% (5 votes)
Brian Damkroger
1% (2 votes)
Chip Stern
1% (2 votes)
Total votes: 225
Filed under
Stereophile Posted: Dec 14, 1998 114 comments

A continuation of last week's question. Equipment reviews are <I>Stereophile</I>'s bread and butter. Do they strike a good balance between technical details and subjective impressions? Are the measurements, charts, and graphs useful to you?

How could <I>Stereophile</I>'s equipment reviews be improved? The listed choices are for your convenience; use the "Comments" box to make other suggestions.
More budget gear
13% (30 votes)
More mid-priced gear
20% (47 votes)
More exotic gear
4% (9 votes)
More photos of gear
4% (10 votes)
More bench tests
1% (2 votes)
More side-by-side comparisons
13% (30 votes)
More three-way (or more) comparisons
27% (62 votes)
More electronic and acoustic theory
3% (8 votes)
More consideration of compatibility with associated gear
9% (22 votes)
More emphasis on reliability
2% (5 votes)
More emphasis on upgradability
1% (3 votes)
Mention manufacturer's track record with similar products
2% (4 votes)
Total votes: 232
Filed under
Stereophile Posted: Dec 06, 1998 90 comments

Is it the reviews of hardware or music or both? Do you like to get technical or not? When you read about audio in magazines, no matter whose magazine it might be, what do you really like to see, and what would you like to see more of?

What types of articles do you most like to read in magazines about audio? Leave suggestions in the "Comments" box for articles you'd like to see.
Equipment reports
48% (105 votes)
Music reviews
6% (13 votes)
Industry news
2% (4 votes)
Technical features
7% (16 votes)
Industry interviews
1% (3 votes)
Music interviews
0% (1 vote)
Best of the year features
1% (2 votes)
An even mix of the above
26% (57 votes)
None of the above, here's my idea . . .
8% (17 votes)
Total votes: 218
Filed under
Stereophile Posted: Nov 29, 1998 108 comments

Many audiophiles have substantially improved the sound of their systems by experimenting with vibration control. How about you?

Have you tried controlling vibration in your system?
Yes! A huge improvement!
21% (46 votes)
Yes. A notable improvement.
38% (85 votes)
Yes. A marginal improvement.
21% (47 votes)
Yes. No improvement.
5% (10 votes)
Yes. A big disappointment.
1% (3 votes)
Yes. Made it sound worse.
0% (1 vote)
No. Vibration control is voodoo.
5% (11 votes)
No. I don't care.
8% (18 votes)
Total votes: 221
Filed under
Dan Landen Posted: Nov 22, 1998 0 comments

CD players started life as single boxes, but audiophiles soon broke them down into separate transports and D/A converters. Jitter-reduction devices were soon added, but now some manufacturers are going back to a single-box approach. Which do you prefer?

Do you prefer a "one-box" CD player, or separate transport and D/A converter boxes? Why?
One box is best
58% (151 votes)
Separate transport and converter
14% (37 votes)
Separate transport and converter with jitter reduction
17% (43 votes)
Still deciding
11% (28 votes)
Total votes: 259
Filed under
Stereophile Posted: Nov 15, 1998 0 comments

DVD players are backward-compatible with CDs, offering consumers the ability to replace their CD players with DVD decks. Some record companies have released DVD-Videos carrying 24/96 high-resolution audio to take advantage of the new format, and DVD-Audio should be just around the corner.

Have you, or do you plan to, replace your CD player with a DVD machine?
Have already replaced CD player with DVD
16% (50 votes)
Will replace CD with DVD soon
10% (32 votes)
Will wait a while
15% (48 votes)
Will wait for DVD-Audio to arrive
37% (115 votes)
Not interested in a DVD player right now
22% (68 votes)
Total votes: 313
Filed under
Bard-Alan Finlan Posted: Nov 09, 1998 89 comments

The technology exists to create high-end audio programming that could finally solve the problem audiophiles have had with FM radio for years. But would you be interested enough to buy the equipment and/or pay for the service?

Would you be interested in a high-end audio broadcast medium?
Very interested
31% (69 votes)
Moderately interested
19% (44 votes)
Interested
13% (29 votes)
Mildy bemused
14% (32 votes)
Not really interested
16% (36 votes)
Who cares?
7% (16 votes)
Total votes: 226
Filed under
Stereophile Posted: Nov 02, 1998 0 comments

The common wisdom of "bigger is better" doesn't always hold true in audio. High-end speaker systems, for example, have been getting bigger and smaller at the same time. Which trend do you favor?

Have you been moving toward bigger or smaller speakers in recent years?
Bigger is better
26% (66 votes)
About the same size---big
14% (36 votes)
About the same size---medium
11% (27 votes)
About the same size---small
6% (16 votes)
Getting smaller
21% (52 votes)
Size doesn't matter
22% (54 votes)
Total votes: 251

Pages

X
Enter your Stereophile.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Loading