|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio J. Gordon Holt
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters RMAF 2009 SSI 2009 CES 2009 RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Red Shift: Doppler distortion in loudspeakers:
When I wrote the "Doppler and DiAural" sidebar for my recent feature about Doppler distortion in loudspeakers ("Red Shift," November 2004, p.67), I fully expected a retort from DiAural founder Ray Kimber, of Kimber Kable. In the event, both he and Eric Alexander, the originator of DiAural's crossover design concept, took up their pens to point out to me that the Doppler decoding explanation with which DiAural was launched had been withdrawn before my article was published. I wish, of course, that I had known this before writing "Doppler and DiAural," although it would not have dissuaded me from including the sidebar or much altered its content. A thorough explanation of why a loudspeaker cannot cancel out the Doppler distortion generated by a microphone (and vice versa) is just as valid now as it was before DiAural's retraction. In my correspondence with Ray Kimber, I pointed out that one reason I (and, surely, countless others) believed the Doppler decoding explanation was still current was the continued citation—and, in one case, linking on DiAural's website—of press articles repeating the Doppler claim, without any cautionary note to the effect that it had since been rescinded. Promptly and, I thought, in a very gentlemanly way, Kimber conceded this point and immediately set in train changes to the website that will prevent it from, in the future, promulgating this discredited explanation of DiAural's sonic effect. (Which, as I won't need to remind Stereophile readers of long standing, earned the launch of DiAural enthusiastic column-inches in much of the audio media.) Eric Alexander has assured me that he has never developed a crossover topology that was intended to eliminate Doppler artifacts, which reinforces my observation in "Doppler and DiAural" that DiAural's two patents, which cite Alexander as the inventor, make no mention of Doppler distortion in their texts. Doppler decoding, it seems, was merely an attempt to explain the sonic benefits of DiAural, and so came after the event, not before.—Keith Howard
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


