|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Simaudio Moon LP5.3 phono preamplifier:
Sidebar 3: More Measurements, from November 2007 (Vol.30 No.11): Last month, I followed up Michael Fremer's March 2007 review of Simaudio's versatile Moon LP5.3 phono preamplifier ($1400) with a set of measurements. In general, the LP5.3 got a clean bill of health, with very low noise, superb linearity, and excellent channel separation. However, I was concerned about its low overload margin at 20kHz and above, which I felt restricted the LP5.3 to use with phono cartridges with lower-than-normal output levels. In his "Manufacturer's Comment" in the October issue (p.210), Simaudio's Lionel Goodfield explained why the Canadian manufacturer felt this overload margin would not be a problem in actual use. However, he was more concerned by the mismatch in RIAA equalization I had found between the channels (fig.1). Above 1kHz, the right channel shelved up 0.5dB higher than the left, over a broad enough range to be audible. "With regard to the RIAA channel mismatch above 1kHz, we're mystified," Lionel wrote. "Upon receiving JA's review text, we immediately measured five randomly selected production units taken from our stockroom, as well as one of our engineering prototypes. They all yielded significantly better measurements with regard to both channel mismatching and error-curve shaping."
Fig.1 Simaudio Moon LP5.3, serial no. 1571715, phono-stage RIAA error at 1mV input at 1kHz (0.5dB/vertical div., right channel dashed). It did look to me as if there was an out-of-spec capacitor or resistor in the right channel's high-frequency equalization network, so I asked for a third sample. (My sample had been a different one from the one auditioned by Michael Fremer.) My original sample's serial number was 1571715, the new sample's 1571721, suggesting that they had been manufactured close together in time. Fig.2 shows the RIAA error curve for the third LP5.3, measured under identical conditions to the second. It is significantly better: whereas the first sample's response had been –0.05dB left, –0.1dB right, +0.26dB left, and +0.75dB right, this sample's response fell between Ò0.08dB limits. The channels are now very well matched overall, and the shape of the error curve is less boosted in the highs.
Fig.2 Simaudio Moon LP5.3, serial no. 1571721 phono-stage RIAA error at 1mV input at 1kHz (0.5dB/vertical div., right channel dashed). It does look, therefore, that my first sample of the LP5.3 was a rogue.—John Atkinson
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

