Newvelle Jazz

The movement towards a super premium vinyl “experience,” and the larger notion of vinyl as a lifestyle is getting another eager supporter as a new subscription-only label, Newvelle Records, launched this week via a Kickstarter campaign.
Fri, 01/29/2016

I Come From Down in the Valley

I’d love to hear what Gary Tallent thinks. Bass players never get to speak their piece.
Fri, 01/29/2016

An Open Letter from Bill Low of AudioQuest

An open letter from myself and AudioQuest to the community—to everyone who cherishes the truth, regardless of their opinions about audio and digital cables, regardless of their opinions about AudioQuest.
Thu, 01/28/2016

Oracle Delphi Mk.VI Second Generation turntable Associated Equipment

Thu, 01/28/2016

COMMENTS
spacehound's picture

Sometimes I wish CDs and computer audio had never been invented.

Only then could I justify such a beautiful thing to myself.
:)

Osgood Crinkly III's picture

O, how lovely! Acrylic and stainless steel, flashy & pretty, but the least absorbent material. Is that an SME II or III? Why not a V?

Pages

Oracle Delphi Mk.VI Second Generation turntable Specifications

Thu, 01/28/2016

COMMENTS
spacehound's picture

Sometimes I wish CDs and computer audio had never been invented.

Only then could I justify such a beautiful thing to myself.
:)

Osgood Crinkly III's picture

O, how lovely! Acrylic and stainless steel, flashy & pretty, but the least absorbent material. Is that an SME II or III? Why not a V?

Pages

Oracle Delphi Mk.VI Second Generation turntable Page 2

Thu, 01/28/2016

COMMENTS
spacehound's picture

Sometimes I wish CDs and computer audio had never been invented.

Only then could I justify such a beautiful thing to myself.
:)

Osgood Crinkly III's picture

O, how lovely! Acrylic and stainless steel, flashy & pretty, but the least absorbent material. Is that an SME II or III? Why not a V?

Pages

Oracle Delphi Mk.VI Second Generation turntable

The stats are impressive: Quebec's Oracle Audio Technologies, formerly Trans Audio (footnote 1), has been in business for 37 years, during which they've sold nearly 11,000 Oracle Delphi turntables. That's not bad for a perfectionist turntable—and especially not bad for a perfectionist turntable whose first and most estimable competitor, the Linn Sondek LP12, was well established by the time of the Delphi's debut, in 1979.
Thu, 01/28/2016

Recording of February 2016: A Love Supreme: The Complete Masters

John Coltrane: A Love Supreme: The Complete Masters
John Coltrane, Archie Shepp, tenor saxophone; McCoy Tyner, piano; Jimmy Garrison, Art Davis, bass; Elvin Jones, drums
Impulse! 80023727-02 (3 CDs). 1965/2015. Bob Thiele, orig. prod.; Rudy Van Gelder, orig. eng.; Harry Weinger, Ashley Kahn, reissue prods.; Kevin Reeves, reissue mastering. ADD? TT: 2:43:31
Performance *****
Sonics *****

While every jazz fan has his or her favorite period of John Coltrane's career—the promising Prestige years, the "hits" on Atlantic, the single knockout punch of Blue Trane, his lone album for Blue Note—nearly everyone agrees that the intensely realized vision and sonic charms of A Love Supreme make that album his masterpiece. The recordings Coltrane made for his final label, Impulse!, at first swung between more free jazz outings like Impressions (1963) and more conventional recordings, such as duet albums with Duke Ellington and Johnny Hartman (both in 1963). A Love Supreme (1965) was his most coherent artistic statement, one grounded in his love for God, and embodying an affirmation of the power of love over dissension and division. The album also marked the beginning of Coltrane's final two years, in which he would relentlessly plumb new depths of meaning in his music, and hone an ever more assaultive, angular sound that seethed with emotion and an endless stream of ideas. The strident, dissonant, refractory music that followed A Love Supreme, and now known as his New Thing, remains controversial.

Thu, 01/28/2016

West Side Story on Analog Spark

I wrote about the new audiophile label Analog Spark a few months ago, on its vinyl reissue of Dave Brubeck's oft-overlooked 1954 Jazz Goes to College. Now its proprietor, Mark Piro, has come out with a few Broadway musical soundtracks, the best of which is West Side Story, with its score by Leonard Bernstein and lyrics by a young Stephen Sondheim.
Wed, 01/27/2016

Chord Electronics Mojo D/A headphone amplifier Measurements

Wed, 01/27/2016

COMMENTS
tonykaz's picture

Ok,
nice piece of Journalism.
People tell me the same sort of things about the Chord stuff, I'm coming to the idea that the Mojo is "today's" version of the 1970's Linn LP12 discovery, a simple device that "sounds" better. ( the LP12 retailed for around $1,000 back then)

Everywhere I look, I see civilians using the iPhone as a music source, they'll buy after-market earphones from the Apple Store, then they're pretty much done.

Those wanting or having discovered better performance from something like the JDS combo might decide to ( or not to ) bother with extra electronic little boxes.

I suspect that when these civilians encounter that MOJO they'll want one, it's a charismatic kind of thing.

But it's more than that, isn't it, it's a Linn/Naim set-up that fits into a shirt pocket and can sit on a Coffee Shop table. It's a totally attractive little thing that everyone will want to touch and try.

So, I'm thinking, it's the Gateway device into the Future of High-End music performance. The same price as the Phone itself but with no monthly service contract.

I think that Franks & Team hit a Home Run.

I recall first hearing a Linn, playing Sweet Georgia Brown from a Sheffield Labs Vinyl. wow, what an eye opener that was! and thru Naim Nait & Linn Kanns, right up against the wall. I can still remember the "sticker shock" I felt. ( I bought the LP12/Ittok/Asak right then and there ).

Now we have digital music sounding wonderful and we have the Mojo introducing folks to affordable high-end.

I love the British Stuff.

Tony in Michigan

dalethorn's picture

The fact that headphones are a craze with the young who are budget-constrained doesn't change history. The Mojo is a natural evolution from things long ago - the 1960's Philips compact cassette recorder for example. Today, for $50 USD, you can buy a FiiO K1 DAC/amp for iPhones that will audibly improve even the latest and best iPhone sound, but the tiny thumb-sized DAC, powered by the phone itself, is suitable only with reasonably efficient headphones. I don't doubt the superiority of the Mojo (and other DACs), but when you hold the very, very tiny FiiO in hand and experience what it does, you'll better understand where all this is going.

tonykaz's picture

Nice reporting,
Looks like the Audiophile iPhone Race is on but I don't think the Phone people think of themselves as Audiophiles, do they?
I just checked to discover FiiO K1 pricing around $39 USD, not that it matters, the price is well down into the impulse range!
I think that we're seeing a whole new Channel opening up, one that promises to be the dominant music delivery system for the next few years, (dominant in the Global sense).
The next generation of Audiophiles will be say'n things like "I first discovered good sound from my iPhone & K1".
I wonder how many will want to ( or be able to ) make Sound Quality a priority.
What loudspeakers will an iPhone based person own?
Probably none of this fits into the High-End, at least for now. Audio hobbyist's grannies will be the ones that own this K1 type stuff, my wife would look at it thinking it's a Lip Stick!

The Phone is a mandatory component to Social Integration and Mobility. We have to take this Channel seriously.

Tony in Michigan

dalethorn's picture

Psychology plays the big role in portable audio, for several reasons. The long-term success of manufacturers in that business is recognizing where their priorities are going to be. Portable headphones approaching $1000 and portable DAC/amps approaching the mid-$2000's are already reality. As early as 1984 I demonstrated a full-up desktop computer system based around a pocket computer with a serial interface that supported all the necessary components, and when work was over, the pocket computer would be detached and placed into a pocket where (get this) it could be pulled out at any moment and used like today's iPhone with tiny screen and keyboard on-the-go. That's 32 years ago. So I know very well where the potentials are for growth in this business.

tonykaz's picture

Apple made 700 Million phones, so far, and they're not the largest. They have made Music part of the phone experience!
Lethargic Audio Industry philosophy apart, the phone & google have become an integral component of the Auto Industry and now have a place in our daily lives.
I'm sitting here, watching and waiting for our Audio Industry wake up from a long sleep to emerge from the doldrums of Vinyl.

Music is "Everyman's Dopamine", billions upon billions of Dollars will be spent for it.

And, it's up for grabs!

Oh, to be young again & "in the game".

Tony in Michigan

dalethorn's picture

Large numbers does not make the producer 'right', any more than the fallacy of appeal to the majority or authority is right. Steve Jobs did commit the miracle in raising Apple from those very doldrums to the biggest of the big. They did a lot of things right, and I dare say that it wouldn't have happened with anyone except Steve Jobs. Jobs had his limits unfortunately, and from the beginning with his billboards all over the U.S. proclaiming the iPod Nano to be "impossibly small", to today's iPhones and Macbooks being "incredibly thin", his focus (and now Apple's focus) on thinness long since achieved its target, and I have doubts that *anyone* at Apple knows exactly why Jobs was so neurotic about thinness. After all, those Macbooks are carried in bags or cases that are pretty much just as fat as carries any other laptop. Do you understand the extreme devotion to thinness?

dalethorn's picture

BTW, none of this has anything to do with the music industry per se being lethargic. It goes back as I said to the 1950's with pocket radios, to the 1960's with small cassette recorders, and then especially to the 1970's with real pocket computers (not calculators -- computers). HP for one example produced those advanced pocket gizmos, which soon evolved to support a modest graphic and sound capability. Still, nobody in *any* industry understood handheld computing and its applicability to graphics and music, until Steve Jobs noticed the digital revolution and the proliferation of MP3's, and made an art of it. A wise man who led the first personal computer club (handheld computers BTW) stated that "The only truly personal computer is one that is with you at all times, like a wristwatch." He said that in 1974, and it took decades for the "Industry" to get behind it.

dalethorn's picture

I forgot to note that the iPhone (or similar device) could be the CPU of your high-fidelity home system, but at this point there are limitations, on the Apple side at least. One, to avoid Apple's resolution limit of 44-48 khz, you need a player that doesn't access the iPhone's music files. That means the player app you choose would have to have its own 'container' for the files, which would not be seen by any other apps. And the maximum memory is 128 gb, or ~3500 4-minute FLAC-format tracks at 44 khz. Or only 1600 tracks at 96 khz resolution. I've always (for > 30 years) seen this as an ideal - use the pocket device as the core player of my home system, and take the same player with a portable amp on the road.

tonykaz's picture

It is coming down to the Wrist Watch, ( the Star Trek communicator ) sort of thing. Home systems will wirelessly connect to Powered Speakers.

I can even envision eyeglasses as our monitors.

How far away are we, time wise?

Is it true that Ben Franklin gave us the Lightning Rod only 250 years ago, why didn't God give it to Moses? ( along with the Periodic Table and the Germ Theory )

The Apple Story says they had 1,000 talented people working on the Phone in 2004, 4 years before it's introduction.

Apple seems to be our largest Engineering Company, it looks like they're designing our futures.

Tony in Michigan

dalethorn's picture

If I picked the developers for the iPhone, we could have done it with 30 people, not 1000. Look up some of the fun texts on the original Unix developers, or the people who patched a wealth of instructions into 300 bytes on a trans-solar-system craft. There are miracles, but it requires people who 'know' to perform them.

tonykaz's picture

Canadians havta pay $800 bucks unless they come to the States where they'll pay only $600.

And they don't have all that Military expense to cope with.

Tony in Michigan

ps. it don't seem right somehow!, wonder what they cost in London England?

spacehound's picture

I purchased mine mainly to go from the Onkyo HF Player app on a 128Gb iPod via the Lightning connector/Camera cable to the Chord and then via its Line output to the Aux socket on the car audio system.

192/24 WAV/FLAC/ALAC or whatever and DSD if you like it. What more do you need? (I don't have any music greater than 192/24.)

PERSONALLY I LIKE THE FPGA. I will NOT pay crazy prices (up to 20,000 dollars) for a box containing a 10 dollar DAC chip which does all the real work plus a power supply, a simple clock, and a little audio amplification for the other 19,990 dollars. So my 'fixed' DAC is a dCS for the same reason.

Tony - 399 UK Pounds. (Less about 21% tax if you tell them you are taking it back to the USA).

tonykaz's picture

It's tricky getting that VAT scrubbed off, I've done it though.
FPGA is the telling thing, how many outfits have the Engineering talent?
I'm figuring Apple will include something nice in the next few years or less.
High Quality Music reproduction has been democratized.

I lived in the UK when VAT was only 13%

Tony in Michigan

dce22's picture

Throw your Pono's into the trash bin.

Competitiors need to watch and learn how to make a proper portable Audio DAC.

Ktracho's picture

To be fair, Pono can store your music, so you don't need to tether it to another device. (Of course, on the flip side, you can't stream to it from your computer or phone.)

dce22's picture

Mojo sound quality exceeds many more expensive desktop dac's and it's a class above Pono.

You will always carry your phone regardless so it's not an issue.

Pono music store is good but Pono Player?

Not. iPhone 5/6 has better headamp.

Ktracho's picture

Personally, I've waited so long to upgrade my DAC, I might as well wait until there is more availability of MQA-capable DACs. It would be really nice if Chord jumped on the bandwagon. I hope I don't have to wait too much longer.

spacehound's picture

Wanting 'high quality' non-CD audio for my new car and having mistakenly not ordered the Burmester/Mercedes audio option (which cannot be retrofitted) I just purchased the Chord Mojo, a 128GB iPod, and the Onkyo HF player iOS app about ten days ago. The Mojo, set to 'line' output, plugs into the 3.5mm 'Aux' input on the 'standard Mercedes issue' audio system.

I thought of purchasing the Astell & Kern Junior but had doubts if its output was sufficient to drive the Mercedes audio system. Additionally it is very limited (no 'apps' and is effectively non upgradable).

The Pono has the same limitations. Additionally it was always hard to find here in the UK and now seems to have totally vanished.

In principle all three do the same job but though the Chord/iPod/Onkyo App solution was more expensive I KNEW it would work. I don't NEED any other iOS apps but the iPod might be a less heavy and clumsy solution for my Naim streamer iOS DLNA control point and/or the iOS JRemote (Windows 10/J River Music Center) software I use in my home system than the over large and too heavy iPad I currently use.

To me upgradeability without replacing it all, and flexibility, is more important than initial cost.

The Pono? Looks excellent to me for what it is intended. The fact that I think Neil Young is a pretentious old fool who produces high-pitched whining noises out of his nose rather than actual songs from his mouth SHOULDN'T influence me but it does.
:)

Long-time listener's picture

John, instead of trying to convince us that this misshapen blob of black plastic with bulbous, walleyed blinking lights is "drop-dead gorgeous," why not just tell us how beautiful it sounds? We're audiophiles. We'll likely buy it no matter how ugly it is.

spacehound's picture

Not that any aircraft I am familiar with (as a pilot) has ever been made out of aluminium as it is far to weak unless alloyed with something else but never mind.

Chord stuff is usually weird-looking, with pointless 'windows' and is mostly silver colored. Purely to make it stand out in the shop. Get it home and it looks like over-styled hospital equipment.

regalar guy's picture

forgive my newb-ness to portable, and i know there are converting cables galore out there, but i'm struggling to understand how i could get this signal from the mojo into my amplifier if at all.

spacehound's picture

You buy a stereo 3.5mm jack to two RCA plug cable at Wal Mart or anywhere else you fancy and connect the jack to the Mojo earphone outlet and the two RCA plugs to any spare input on the amplifier.

Works fine.

Set the Mojo to 'Line' output when turning it on and its volume control is disabled leaving volume to the amplifier volume control as usual.

For 'safety' the 'Line' setting is NOT remembered by the Mojo as its full volume output might blow some earphones.

If your ANDROID phone DOESN'T have a USB music output (some only use the micro USB socket for data transfer and charging) don't buy the Mojo as you will be wasting your money.

If you have an Apple device the Mojo will work fine with the Lightning connector or the old 30 pin connector provided you buy the correct Apple Camera Adaptor or Camera Cable.

CARE:
If you actually INTEND to use it in a 'mobile manner' with earphones don't forget to wear a dumb expression, walk into lamp posts occasionally, and cross the street without looking to see if a large truck is approaching. We wouldn't want Darwin to miss you, would we?

tonykaz's picture

Can you offer opinions as to the Amplifier Power usefulness in the Mojo?
I'm reading the device to have modest or very modest power output.
Although, nobody seems to complain about it but nobody seems to claim it has more than ample power.

Tony in Michigan

spacehound's picture

It will drive the two earphones (fairly low cost ones) I have to possibly damaging levels even when set to 'phones' rather than 'line'. This surprised me, I admit.

In fact Chord say NOT to switch it to fixed level 'line' output if you are using phones as it may damage them and it is so designed deliberately that your switching it to 'line' output is NOT remembered at your next switch-on and setting to 'line' level can only be done as part of switch-on so won't be 'accidental'. Whereas your previous earphone volume IS remembered so will not be at full and possibly damaging levels.

Why did I buy it?
First - I bought it unseen and unheard on the strength of reviews here and elsewhere and because of its specified high level line output.
Actually I have little interest in earphones and bought it purely because the analog output from an iPod or similar was not high enough to drive my car audio system to satisfactory volumes whereas I knew the Chord 'line' output would be.

So after looking at the Astell & Kern 'Junior' and similar devices I decided that an iPod plus the Chord Mojo was the most flexible, though not the lowest cost, answer. I use the iPod only as a 'transport' via its Lightning connector and camera cable and used as such it goes to 192/24 AND 2X DSD with the Onkyo HF player app. I don't currently HAVE any other use for the iPod (mail, notes, iTunes whatever) but unlike the A & K or equivalents the iPod has those facilities should I ever want them.

Sound quality?
The iPod plus Mojo connected to my good but not crazy expensive home system is indistinguishable from my Naim streamer and dCS DAC. Thus I recommend such a setup both for value and portability. And like the dCS, Chord use their own methods of digital to analog conversion and don't depend on a 10 dollar 'high street quality' bought in chip. That was influential in my decision to buy it.

tonykaz's picture

Well, ok, I was curious about headphone power for Sennheiser HD 600s but I'm happy to accept your answer.
Chord is nice stuff.
I've heard that: Modules will be available for doing various things including SD Card reading & playing.
So, I'm interested.

Maybe interested in their other stuff too, 'in for a penny' sort of thing.

Betcha Franks gets a "K" for Chord's export success.

Tony in Michigan

spacehound's picture

with high impedance phones so with those Sennheisers I strongly suggest you try it first.

BTW: Naim (I use one of their streamers and one of their power amps) has got THREE "Queen's awards for exports". It's a pity they are now owned by the French (whom we dislike) company Focal, though Naim call it a 'merge' :)

tonykaz's picture

I can't share the French 'dislike', I even fly Airbus.

In fact I admire their Medical systems. They do speak a funny language which I can overlook. We never went to war with them!, and they did help us out a bit ( back in the late 1700s ), Focal is nice gear and they take better care of Naim than Linn ever did. I like the Focal Active monitors.

And it ain't Chinese!

Tony in Michigan

spacehound's picture

Chord and dCS stuff is made by real people earning real wages. That influences my purchasing decisions.

I've bought two Harley-Davidsons over the years for the same reason :)

BTW: You'd still be British were it not for the French. We were fighting them (as usual) at the same time as your War of Independence so our attention was not fully on it :)

As for Linn, they never owned Naim. They just co-operated to browbeat everyone else, mainly the British HiFi magazines, both Tiefenbrun of Linn and Vereker of Naim being very strong personalities. Naim was founded by an eccentric called Julian Vereker, a very good amateur racing driver with an interest in audio, who I knew slightly (they are only 15 miles from me). I don't buy Linn stuff. Their famous turntable was a rip-off of someone else's. Linn were a small engineering outfit who were contracted to make some parts for the turntable. They copied the design TOTALLY, even down to the shape of the plexiglass lid, and sold it under their own name. There was a court case about it at the time but neither outfit could afford to fully pursue it.

tonykaz's picture

I know the story. I liked the LP-12 and sold plenty of them and Linn certainly did own the press. Eventually I got a couple of the original AR tables in trades, they were crappy in construction but could be rebuilt to sound nearly as good as the LINN but they remained lesser cousins.

I think that we are still British! We have the language which is the DNA of societies. We enjoy our isolation and the absence of Papist influences, we are an amalgam of governable peoples ( I'm Russian and Swedish with a Polish name).

And we're heading off a Revolution, just now. Thomas Pketty describes the top 10% of us owning 70% of the Assets. He presents a history of revolts where the top 10% own 90%! I'm supporting a populist Bernie Sanders in hopes of heading off bloodshed.

I've been a Schiit person, now I'm admiring Chord design philosophies. The Mojo with it's little modules may become the heart of my music system. I've gone from Meridian M10s down to handheld devices. My world is changing, again!

Tony in Yankee Country

Pages

Pages

X
Enter your Stereophile.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Loading