|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Vienna Acoustics Mozart loudspeaker
Vienna is a beautiful city known for many things, but the design and manufacturing of audio equipment is not one of them. Waltzes and strudel, yes; loudspeakers, no. One exception is Vienna Acoustics, a company that has introduced a line of loudspeakers named after composers: Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, and Haydn. At the 1996 Las Vegas WCES, Sumiko, US distributor of Vienna Acoustics products (footnote 1), demonstrated the second-from-the-top Mozart, and Stereophile reviewers as diverse in their approaches as Jonathan Scull, Tom Norton, and Sam Tellig (as well as yours truly) were unanimous in our admiration of the sound.
To evaluate a product fairly and accurately, there's no substitute for long-term listening in a familiar environment, with high-quality associated components and familiar source materials. In the case of speakers from Vienna Acoustics, it behooves the reviewer to prepare for listening sessions by consuming generous portions of strudel. Yes, it's a dirty job, but somebody has to do it.
Design
The Mozart's baffle is narrow but fairly deep; that 11.6" depth, combined with its 37" height, gives it a substantial volume useful in extending bass response. The two-way design pairs a ScanSpeak 1.1" silk-dome tweeter with two 5.5" woofer/midrange units made to Vienna Acoustics' specifications. The cone of the woofer/midrange is made of "XPP," a new silicone/polypropylene composite material said to possess an exceptional combination of stiffness and self-damping. The crossover has a 9dB slope for the first octave (both high- and low-pass), and 12dB after that. Designer Peter Gansterer says that crossovers measuring almost the same sometimes sound very different, and that much of the development time was spent listening to various crossover configurations. The construction features expensive hand-picked capacitors, 2% tolerance metal-film resistors, and 0.7% tolerance air-core inductors. Special attention has been paid to the input terminal block to reduce the number of internal connections. There are two sets of speaker terminals, with a removable link that allows for bi-wiring. The woofer/midrange drivers have separate and dissimilar internal enclosures, each with its own rear port, and a chamber in the base of the cabinet can be filled with sand (I did so). The cabinet itself is built with materials of varying densities and thicknesses, and bracing is used to stiffen the enclosure. Four spikes are provided to allow for firm mechanical grounding.
Setup
John's pronouncement on first listening to the system: "Not bad, but we're not there yet." He started adjusting RoomTunes and Tube Traps, and moving the speakers by small increments, listening to the effect of each change, while I practiced the poker face that all Stereophile reviewers are advised to put on in this sort of situation. After a couple of hours he pronounced that the setup was to his satisfaction. The speakers were a little closer together than where I'd placed them; the angle from the listening position was about 60 degrees. They were tilted backward (as much as the adjustment range of the spikes would allow) and toed-in to about halfway between the straight-ahead and the facing-the-listener positions. He also pulled the Tube Traps slightly out from the corners, and placed RoomTunes in strategic positions next to some of the record-storage cabinets to damp reflections. The result was much-improved focus and soundstaging; the phasiness was gone, and the sound seemed to "breathe" more. Most pleased, I had difficulty maintaining my poker face. Listening more critically after John Hunter left, I felt that there was still a little too much emphasis in the 50Hz region. I knew that the Vienna Acoustics factory provided optional foam plugs for the ports; John had told me that he didn't like the effect of these plugs, so he didn't ship them. I phoned him and asked for the foam plugs to be sent. He agreed to do so, and suggested that I also try placing a RoomTune panel about 12-15" behind each Mozart. Placing the RoomTune panels in this manner (with the nonreflective side facing the speaker) indeed helped smooth the bass response, and resulted in a further improvement of imaging specificity. As for the foam plugs—well, I have to agree with John's reluctance to use these for bass control. Putting one in each of the lower ports certainly resulted in tighter, leaner bass response, but had a detrimental effect on focus and the speakers' "open" quality. I did all the rest of my listening without the foam plugs. I also placed the speaker grilles where they belong: stored safely in the closet (footnote 2).
Sound
"Hey, come and listen to this!" My wife, Beverley, in the tradition of long-suffering audiophile spouses everywhere, complied. She listened for about a minute and turned to me. "It's a trick, right? You're playing the big speakers!"
Footnote 1: I found out later that Sumiko's role extends beyond that of distributor; they've made a major contribution to the development of design priorities for the Vienna Acoustics line. Footnote 2: The only speaker I have experience with that doesn't sound better with the grille off is the Dunlavy SC-I: its grille has thick felt strips that are an integral part of the design.
Article Continues: Page 2 »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


An impression of sound quality made in a show environment does not always provide an accurate assessment of a product's ultimate worth. If a system featuring a certain component disappoints under such conditions, this is not necessarily an indictment of the specific component: poor sound could be due to another component in the system, unfavorable interactions among components, insufficient break-in/warmup, or the ubiquitous "room problems." On the other hand, if the system as a whole sounds good, this would suggest that each of the components is performing to at least an acceptable standard. However, it's still possible for unusually good show sound to be due to a particularly synergistic combination of components and/or a room/speaker interface that just happens to minimize a speaker's problem areas. Furthermore, show attendees have only a limited amount of time to listen to any one system, and problems not apparent on initial exposure may become more obvious and bothersome in prolonged listening.