I have a different take. Republicans (some) and Democrats (most) are screwing up the Country. I don't see where 'Conservatives' are screwing up the Country.

I wouldn't group them by class.  This isn't a class struggle that is ruining your country.  Anyway, what exactly are your talking about?  The $5 Bank of America is going to charge for using their debit card?  I see they are rioting in NYC over this.  What a joke.  Just get their credit card.

She just told me to take a Levitra.  She has done this before and fooled me.  She can be cruel.

Do you mean that you have had to take 'matters' into your own hands in the past?

I hate it when that happens.

" whats worse than a Liberal " Two Liberal's .

they have no class?

fixed: so both classless assholes are screwing up my Counrty

What do you mean by "no class?"

Can you give me an example?

Thanks,

Mark

n!&&erhead

booing a soldier on his 3rd combat tour

weenergate

rangel

I bet the moderators see that the Class Man is somewhere in French Canada. 

While I do not condone the use of the first description using the "N" word, I do agree that you have three good points thereafter.

Incidently, Code Pink, an organization founded by the ultra-liberal Cindy Sheehan and her minions, made it a point to boo soldiers, spit on soldiers, and print up hateful, vicious signs against our men in uniform.

Examples of Code Pink: And these are shocking! Please check them out.

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.targetofopportunity.com/liberals_hate_troops.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.targetofopportunity.com/codepink.htm&usg=__3T-oRBmcoVAfsCHVc1xAb8Hag1o=&h=390&w=520&sz=50&hl=en&start=547&sig2=jWKSBknF6bCQwI_I4vEILg&zoom=1&tbnid=mVqu89gebtGAZM:&tbnh=98&tbnw=131&ei=VMeITvrLCIW4tgfH6NQ1&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dberkeley%2Bliberals%26start%3D546%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1

Anthony Weiner (Weinergate) was a left-wing Progressive Democrat representing Chuck Schumers old district in NY.

Charlie Rangel, House Ways and Means Chairman and ranking member of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Democrat representative of N.Y. is another far left Progressive liberal.

All are liberal Democrats.

However, I still don't see how Conservatives play into the scenario.

Thanks,

Mark

n!&&erhead (perry is a gay conservative)

booing a gay soldier who is on his 3rd tour and all the conservative candidates endorsed it by their silence

killing x00,000 civilians in a war based on lies

or the 'christian right' lunatics protesting soldiers funerals...the soldiers are dead becasue god hates gays 

lol, you capitalize conservative like it deserves any more respect than liberal...

all of the same ilk: bad for America

you live with blinders on

stop hating, it's like cancer, but instead of flesh it consumes your happiness...

Okay, anyone can look into the booing of the gay soldier.  It was in Orange County County Convention Center (large open auditorium in Florida).  Audience was 5,500+.  Approx. three people booed.  The following week the president during a question and answer replied, "You’ve got audiences cheering at the prospect of somebody dying because they don’t have healthcare and booing a service member in Iraq because they’re gay. That’s not reflective of who we are."  I'm assuming you are embracing the cult of personality perspective?  That would be the distorted latter view in case you are confused.  But one could even fathom that the gay issue is a non-issue by the mere fact that in a Republican debate only three people openly booed a gay soldier.  Who cares that he served three tours overseas.  Some people have served more than three tours and all they did was collect trash.  The gay soldier openly stated that he wasn't "serving" his country but was more exact in stating he didn't want to lose "his job". 

It appears you are taking isolated and occasional human behavior you don't condone and comparing up to a national level debate.  You should learn our language.  We don't use the "N" word and call it something else.  In fact, the "N" word isn't part of this forum's language.  You're on the wrong forum.  You need to find yourself a nice quite Canadian forum where you can use the "N" word.  Shouldn't be hard to find at all.

I think ST pretty much summed up the rest of my thoughts on your stupidity. 

If you really want to help the USA find a way to lower the over 30 thousand automobile related deaths each year.  Since the War on Terror over 321,000 people have been killed on U.S. highways.  Compare that to the 6,000 killed participating in the War on Terror.  Why aren't you attacking the Department of Transportation, the automobile industry, and so forth.  Why are you trying to start a bunch of shit over a few people booing a gay soldier at a Republican debate where nobody interfered with his constitutional right of freedom of speech.  Even the booing was an exercise in that same right.   It is like attacking all liberals because a few are bent on getting convicted rapists out of prison.  You really should get your priorities in order before tackling such complex issues concerning the United States.  Don't worry, we will keep our promise to keep your families safe in time of Canadian national security.  After all, we have been keeping this promise since the Cold War.  We won't forsake Canada.  We need your oil.  You need to sell us oil.  The customer is always right so STFU, please.  Just be grateful you have us as your neighbor.  We don't expect a thing from Canada except maybe a token force in our war to protect even Canada.  Oh, and your oil too.  Now, lets talk about the high price of oil at the U.S. gas pump.  It usually starts with high wholesale prices.  Wouldn't you agree?

You know what be interesting is your sources for civilians killed in War on Terror and which lies are directly related to deaths.  We could have several civilians related deaths directly related to the attack on NYC and several that are unconfirmed on the reason why, and several based on lies.  But even that would be impossible to count because the dead can't talk and they wouldn't know the difference anyway.  So, how many?  Exactly.  Seems Canada didn't have a problem with night area bombing entire cities during War War II.   The total civilian deaths for which in Europe alone exceeded both the A bombs dropped on Japan.   And I'm only referring to the British and Canadians bombing at night.  I'm not referring to the more dangerous precision daylight bombing the U.S. embraced.  When we finally took up night time bombing we killed a bunch of Canadians in the process.   Sorry about that.  Bombing at night is dangerous.  Sometimes the wrong people get killed.  The Americans thought it bad guys.  Sort of like you.  These turned out to be good Canadians shooting a improperly scheduled night time live fire excersise in a war zone.  Not exactly the coolest place to decide it is the time and place to practice shooting at night. But we are talking about Canadians here.  It was probably a budget thing.  No budget to practice at night in Canada but once in an active war zone the budget allows for real bullets that glow in the dark.  Sounds logical from a Canadian point of view to save money for national healthcare.  So, basically, I can stretch this even further and say these Canadians were killed to save money for social healthcare based on lies.  How many Canadians have died because social medicine doesn't budget for diagnosing treatable cancer in a timely manner?  It would take a mountain of lies to get this to work and it does work like this in social medicine.  I hope you don't get a toothache.   That would hurt for several days wait.

It is interesting to see that the victims of the big lie pumped out by the allegedly conservative, actuall radical reactionary party, keep spewing the same old hatred of liberals, liberals, liberals that they've been spewing out for the last 20 years.

It is ironic, sad, but also catastrophic that the utterly insane  Republican party ( as opposed to the merely moronic Democrats) has stifled any hope of avoiding a second dip to the present depression with their idiotic rantings about "no more taxes", when it's tax cuts, coupled with their own removal of banking reguluations, that caused this depression.  This same republican party, that deliberately and willfully attempts to maximize misery in America, then spins the misery they create as the liberals fault.  Goebels would be proud of them, as would Pravda and whatever newspaper their government allows them to publish in Iran.

At this point, as much as most Democrats seem at least mildly moronic and unable to see beyond their own noses, the Republicans have engaged in an unprecented war on the working man, one that tops the ones waged by the steel, coal, and railroad barons of the past centuries, have ruined the life of the working man, and have used the misery they've created to bamboozle the working man into voting for them.

And, here, where we should see intellegent people having intellegent discussions, we see instead the same reflexive spewing of hatred and propaganda.

Everything you posted JJ is subjective.  As is the BIG LIE.  One thing that is not a lie is that Michael Moore will die an untimely death.  I suspect he will drop dead from a heart  attack.  That would be a BIG DEAL.  Ya think?

.

.