ncdrawl
ncdrawl's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 12 months ago
Joined: Oct 18 2008 - 9:18am
what is the optimum listening room shape?
Jan Vigne
Jan Vigne's picture
Offline
Last seen: Never ago
Joined: Mar 18 2006 - 12:57pm

Larger at one end than the other (no parallel surfaces). After that, Golden Dimensions are nice.

ethanwiner
ethanwiner's picture
Offline
Last seen: Never ago
Joined: Sep 1 2005 - 2:26pm

Acoustically speaking, there is no optimum shape (or size). If there were, all rooms would aim for that and we'd never have the huge variation we see. What's "optimum" depends directly on how much shell space you have available, and of course how much money you're willing to invest.

Now, there are plenty of guidelines. Minimum size for excellent results is generally quoted as 2500 cubic feet. Angled walls can be useful, but are not mandatory. Angling the walls does not help low frequencies much, though it can avoid flutter echo at mid and high frequencies.

Entire books have been written about this!

--Ethan

absolutepitch
absolutepitch's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 2 weeks ago
Joined: Jul 9 2006 - 8:58pm


Quote:
Larger at one end than the other (no parallel surfaces). After that, Golden Dimensions are nice.

I seem to remember reading that those Golden Dimensions are able to distribute the standing wave modes more evenly across the frequency band than other ratios.

ethanwiner
ethanwiner's picture
Offline
Last seen: Never ago
Joined: Sep 1 2005 - 2:26pm


Quote:
I seem to remember reading that those Golden Dimensions are able to distribute the standing wave modes more evenly across the frequency band than other ratios.


There's no ideal ratio. Every shape is a compromise. If you'd like to play around with different dimensions to see how the modes relate, my Graphical Mode Calculator program makes this very easy.

--Ethan

Log in or register to post comments
-->
  • X