Totem Dreamcatcher loudspeaker

The two-way, biwirable, rear-ported Dreamcatcher is designed and manufactured in Canada; its drive-units are designed by Totem, but made and assembled in Europe. The 1" titanium-dome tweeter, manufactured by German Acoustik, is mated to a 4" Scan-Speak woofer. Totem founder Vince Bruzzese feels very strongly about sourcing his drivers in the West. In the past, he got his small woofers from Peerless in Denmark, but switched to Scan-Speak when Peerless started manufacturing in China. Bruzzese also pointed out that the tweeter used in the Dreamcatcher costs him €16, more than 15 times as much as most similar Asian-made tweeters.

The Dreamcatcher is built using lock-mitered construction, a technique derived from the construction of heirloom furniture, which Totem claims contributes to a speaker cabinet's rigidity, longevity, and visual beauty. The speakers are available finished in Black Ash or genuine Mahogany ($575/pair), Cherry ($625), or White ($650). My white samples were quite attractive, blending with my room's décor without calling attention to themselves.

When I knocked on a Dreamcatcher's cabinet, I could sense no trace of cabinet resonance—something I expect to experience only with much more expensive speakers. Totem strongly recommends that the Dreamcatchers be listened to with their grilles removed. I listened with and without the grilles, and heard a negligible difference; grille-less, there was a touch more transparency. I was further encouraged to leave the grilles off because they made the Dreamcatcher look cheap; naked, the speakers looked like much more expensive speakers. Totem also recommends that the Dreamcatcher be given 40–50 hours of break-in before any serious listening is begun. (My review samples had already had over 100 hours of break-in when I received them.) As usual with bookshelf models, I placed the Dreamcatchers on my steel Celestion Si stands, which I've filled with sand and lead shot.

Sound
The Dreamcatcher has been one of the most difficult speakers I've reviewed, with a sound very different from that of any other affordable speaker I've heard. It took me many hours of listening to get to the bottom of what made this little speaker tick, and to find the appropriate words to describe its performance.

It's easiest to describe what the Dreamcatcher doesn't do. The laws of physics dictate that there is a limit to the bass extension possible from a small bookshelf speaker. Although the Dreamcatcher didn't sound bass-shy to me, we'll see where John Atkinson's measurements reveal its lower limit to be. It's also not physically possible for a speaker this small to create the high-level dynamic slam of a larger floorstanding loudspeaker, especially with recordings of dramatic orchestral works. Finally, the Dreamcatcher didn't strike me as being the most well-balanced speaker—its high-frequency reproduction is very extended compared to its limited bottom-end extension. The Paradigm Atom v.5, for example, has a much better-balanced sound in which its subjective HF attenuation seems to match its lack of bass extension. But the Dreamcatcher never sounded bright, and its extended HF performance didn't emphasize the lack of low bass, for example, as did the original ProAc Tablette when I last heard it.

Those minor caveats out of the way, I can comfortably say that the Totem Dreamcatcher's performance was just about flawless throughout my listening. From its taut, tuneful, perfectly clean midbass to the highest frequencies, there was no trace of coloration or distortion, and the ability of the pair of them to throw a wide, deep soundstage, even when I sat off axis, was beyond reproach. And for such a tiny bookshelf, the Dreamcatcher was able to reproduce, with dense orchestral fortissimos, a reasonable sense of high-level drama without compression or strain. Even in my large listening room, it behaved like a much larger speaker.

Five attributes of the Dreamcatcher combined to create a breathtaking level of realism that I'd never heard from any other bookshelf speaker. First, the degree of resolution in the midrange let me listen deeply into each recording to uncover an extraordinary amount of detail. This, combined with the best low-level dynamic reproduction I've heard from any speaker—a completely linear integration of loudnesses from pppp to p—made the Dreamcatcher an extremely realistic re-creator of all voices and acoustic instruments. And unlike most bookshelf speakers of this size, which tend to have a subtle thinness in the lower midrange that adds a touch of politeness to tenor saxophones and male voices, the Totem had a rich quality in this region that reminded me of a much larger speaker. Fourth, the integration of this quality of midrange with the Dreamcatcher's detailed, extended, and pristine high frequencies was the best I'd ever heard from a small bookshelf, and more akin to what I'm used to hearing from more expensive electrostatic speakers. And finally, the Totem's perfect reproduction of all transients, with lightning-fast attack and recovery but no trace of sharpness, gave a startling level of realism to all percussion instruments and plucked strings.

Company Info
Totem Acoustic
9165 rue Champ d'Eau
Montreal, Quebec H1P 3M3
Canada
(514) 259-1062
Article Contents
Share | |
Comments
enfant_teribl's picture
Dreamcatcher port

I was wondering whether the port could be plugged, and what sort of effect this would have on measured and perceived response?

aspiers's picture
Measurements & Amp match

Bob,

I have two questions:

1) Are your favourable subjective assessments of the Dreamcatcher's altered at all by the less than ideal measurements?  This seems like a case where measurements don't tell the entire story and subsequently don't guarantee sound quality.  Agree? Disagree?

2) I'm curious about your thoughts regarding matching the Simaudio Moon i.5 with the Dreamcatcher's in a small to medium sized room, most likely as a smaller bedroom system?  I do recognize that you have not reviewed the i.5, however, you did recently review the Simaudio i-1.  knowing Simaudio, my assumption would be that many of the positive characteristics of the i-1 would carry-over to i.5.  Additionally, your positive feelings towards the i-1 seem to parallel the Creek Destiny, with which you used when reviewing the Dreamcatcher's.

Cheers

pagmed's picture
Dreamcatcher

I have to agree with Mr. Reina on this. These speakers sound is indeed intoxicating. It is involving, refined, fast, detailed but most of all it is just musical. I'm breakin-in a pair of dreamcatchers. Right out of the box they sound amazing. They image like crazy! Can't stop listening. I'm running mine with a Marantz PM6004/CD6004, and found it to be powerful enough for them. One thing I noticed is that the woofer is different than the ones in the pictures in this website. Mine have a plug in the woofer. Fantastic speakers! Forget measurements! Just listen! 

Site Map / Direct Links