Sonic Frontiers SFCD-1 CD player Comparisons with the Accuphase DP-55

Comparisons with the Accuphase DP-55, September 1996 (Vol.19 No.9):

Having just reviewed the similarly-priced Sonic Frontiers SFCD-1 CD player (June '96, Vol.19 No.6), I was interested to hear what the Accuphase DP-55 had to offer. The $5995 DP-65 had been favorably reviewed by TJN, and the $21,000+ DP-90/DC-91 pair had so impressed Dick Olsher that he bought the review samples (see June 1995, Vol.18 No.6).

The following impressions were gained with the DP-55 in its optimum setup: no attenuation, and playing through the balanced outputs.

It was evident from the start that the $3995 DP-55 interpreted the music differently than did the $3495 SFCD-1. The Accuphase player had a brighter, more forward, and incisive quality. It had tremendous clarity, detail, and zip, in contrast with the SFCD-1's more subtle presentation.

Although I wouldn't characterize the DP-55 as overly bright, it had a full measure of treble energy. Cymbals assumed a more prominent place in the mix, sounding slightly forward of the rest of the presentation. Although free from grain, the treble had a bit of hardness that called attention to itself. The DP-55's treble lacked the refinement, inner detail, and finely filigreed presentation heard from the SFCD-1.

The hint of treble hardness on cymbals extended down to the upper midrange. Instruments rich in upper order harmonics took on a slightly mechanical sound. For example, the piano's timbre in Sonata: Piano Works by Franz Liszt (Stereophile STPH008-2) was overlaid with a trace of glare and "clanginess" not heard from the SFCD-1. The magnificent Steinway D, which I heard at length in the church and through the live microphone feed during the recording process, sounded colder through the DP-55 than it did either in my memory of it or through the SFCD-1. Similarly, the violins in Peter McGrath's recording of Handel's Water Music (Harmonia Mundi HMU 907010) sounded thinner and brighter than through other digital front ends, with a trace of edge.

The DP-55's rendering of detail, like its reproduction of transients, exhibited immediacy and vividness. Low-level signals were easily resolved through the DP-55, sounding almost as though a layer of detail had been brought up in level. At the very finest degree of low-level information and inner detail, however, the DP-55 was less resolving and refined sounding than the SFCD-1. The DP-55 lacked a sense of ease in revealing detail, bordering instead on the analytical.

On the plus side, the DP-55 had good bass reproduction. The player had deep extension, midbass weight that was well-balanced, and clear bass articulation. Kick drum had a nice solidity and impact, with a greater sense of extreme bottom-end tautness and extension than through the SFCD-1. The mid-bass was leaner and drier than that of the Sonic Frontiers player, which had slightly more mid-and-upper bass weight and greater bloom. The SFCD-1's rendering of bass guitar had more rhythmic flow, forward propulsion, and pace.

Overall, the DP-55 wasn't competitive with the SFCD-1 or several other similarly-priced digital front-ends on hand (the $3590 Parasound C/BD-2000 and D/AC-2000 combination, for example). The Sonic Frontiers player was more musical and inviting, with a subtle yet highly detailed presentation, more air and space, and greater timbral liquidity.

In terms of features, appearance, and operation of the drawer, the DP-55 was miles ahead of the SFCD-1. The DP-55 has digital inputs that allow it to be used as a processor, digital outputs so it can become a transport, as well as remote volume control, none of which are included on the SFCD-1. In addition, the DP-55's silky drawer operation makes the Sonic Frontiers player seem clunky.

Putting the listening impressions aside, you can look at the SFCD-1/DP-55 comparison in two ways. For roughly the same money, the DP-55 gives you the ability to use the player as a transport or as a processor, remote volume control, and vastly better appearance and drawer operation. Conversely, the SFCD-1 has a massive power supply, HDCD filter, UltraAnalog DAC, and a tubed output stage, whereas the DP-55 has a small power supply, NPC filter, Burr-Brown DACs, and an op-amp output stage.—Robert Harley

Sonic Frontiers
205 Annagem Blvd.
Mississauga, Ontario L5T 2VI
(905) 632-0180

pocketchange's picture

With zero support from those claiming to know this product etc., is there a point to upgrading the clock in the SFCD-1? Reading the measurements along with a clean front-end, tell me "it's pretty much" tossing funds in a less than positive direction.
I have no issue improving equipment except component readings from outer space
that in the long will only benefit someones bottom line... pc

Enter your username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.