linden518
linden518's picture
Offline
Last seen: Never ago
Joined: Dec 12 2007 - 5:34am
So Thomas Edison wasn't the 1st?!?!?
Buddha
Buddha's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 6 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2005 - 10:24am

Comments?

How can anyone make comments? It was played back via MP3.

If you can find me a 24/96 version we'll talk.

linden518
linden518's picture
Offline
Last seen: Never ago
Joined: Dec 12 2007 - 5:34am


Quote:
If you can find me a 24/96 version we'll talk.


smejias
smejias's picture
Offline
Last seen: 13 years 5 months ago
Joined: Aug 25 2005 - 10:29am

This is fascinating, but I agree with the researcher, David Giovannoni, who feels that this discovery takes nothing away from Edison. Seems that Scott and Edison had different goals. Beyond that, in order to get sounds off of Scott's phonautograph, these researches had to use modern-day technology. Scott didn't invent the computer. If some scientist one hundred years from now takes my blog and makes it sing, I don't think I should get credit for that.

Edison was more of an audiophile. Scott liked the squiggly lines. He would have loved John Cage's scores.

Cool, nonetheless.

This bit is also interesting, though:


Quote:
Elk
Elk's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 7 months ago
Joined: Dec 26 2006 - 6:32am

Unbelievably cool! Thanks!!


Quote:
If some scientist one hundred years from now takes my blog and makes it sing, I don't think I should get credit for that.


No, but Al Gore will take credit.

smejias
smejias's picture
Offline
Last seen: 13 years 5 months ago
Joined: Aug 25 2005 - 10:29am


Quote:
No, but Al Gore will take credit.

That's fine with me.

Buddha
Buddha's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 6 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2005 - 10:24am


Quote:

Quote:
No, but Al Gore will take credit.

That's fine with me.

Yeah, but then the other side will start in with the "What does that one hundred and sixty year old know about anything? He was wrong about global warming, it happened much more quickly that that idiot thought."

mrlowry
mrlowry's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 years 3 weeks ago
Joined: May 30 2006 - 1:37pm

Interesting article but for me recording sound is pointless if you can't reproduce it. This Frenchman didn't know if his paper rolls would EVER be playable. It reminds me of the old question, "If a tree falls in the forest, but nobody hears it does it make a sound?" The fidelity on that was atrocious. I would argue that if you didn't know what song was recorded, you'd never be able to figure it out. Edison is the man in my mind. His invention was practical, this thing wasn't. It's more of a historical curiosity, interesting but of little to no technological value.

dbowker
dbowker's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: May 8 2007 - 6:37am

Pretty amazing idea that guy had. Funny to think of the "faith" a scientist had that someday, some one would be able to play back his recordings.

Elk
Elk's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 7 months ago
Joined: Dec 26 2006 - 6:32am


Quote:
Pretty amazing idea that guy had. Funny to think of the "faith" a scientist had that someday, some one would be able to play back his recordings.


Yes!

A wonderful example of the wonders of the human spirit and the drive to understand.

Poor Audiophile
Poor Audiophile's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 months 2 weeks ago
Joined: Feb 14 2006 - 7:35pm

Check out these other links! query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980CE5D
Archeophone Records

Log in or register to post comments
-->
  • X